Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter just took apart SCOTUS nominee on the Mike Rosen show (My report)
Ann Coulter's appearance on the Mike Rosen show, 850am KOA ^ | This morning, Mon. Oct. 4th | Report from Mike Rosen show

Posted on 10/04/2005 10:39:32 AM PDT by ajolympian2004

Ann Coulter just took apart President Bush's SCOTUS nominee on the air during her appearance on the Mike Rosen show here in Denver on 850am KOA. She called for listeners to write their senators to oppose the nomination. Wish you could have heard it!

Ann said - "Totally unqualified", called Judge Roberts "a 'dream' candidate in light of this nomination", mentioned "cronyism" over and over. Much more that I'm trying to digest. I called the station to see if they saved the audio, but no luck on that. Mike Rosen was just about speechless as Ann went on and on about why this was a lousy choice.

I agree with Ann. Huge mistake and missed opportunity.

Ann's choice, Janice Rodgers-Brown. Not enough intestinal fortitude in the White House to go with that choice.

Can't wait for Ann's column on this nomination later this week.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 850am; anncoulter; busheeple; coulter; dubyacandonowrong; dubyahasbecomehisdad; gutlesspubs; harrietmiers; koa; miers; mikerosen; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 881-888 next last
To: AppyPappy
I think this will come down as a battle between religious and libertarian conservatives.

Yup, but it will extend out a bit. Unless she proves to be constitituionally wanting at the hearings the hearings will devolve into an inquisition on whether or not Evangelical Christians can toe the secular line.

After all, diversity on the court can only be counted in colors and chromosomes.

701 posted on 10/04/2005 3:33:42 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Hmmm. Separated at birth?

702 posted on 10/04/2005 3:34:06 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 695 | View Replies]

To: daviscupper
George Bush has said that he nominated Miss Miers because she met all of the criteria. He has never indicated at all that he chose her to keep from having a fight. Just because he didn't choose the person that you might have wanted doesn't make him weak or a caver.
703 posted on 10/04/2005 3:36:51 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, Over there, we will be there until it is Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 674 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle

LOL!!!!


704 posted on 10/04/2005 3:37:52 PM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 702 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

I don't depend on Ann Coulter for my opinions.


705 posted on 10/04/2005 3:39:32 PM PDT by Carolinamom (Weeping may endure for a night, but joy cometh in the morning......Psalm 30:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 703 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591
What a stupid statement. How can she look worse today than yesterday when she has not made an appearance or answered any questions. You are getting the horse before the cart.
706 posted on 10/04/2005 3:40:21 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, Over there, we will be there until it is Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 685 | View Replies]

To: mariabush
It's immaterial.

We're not picking a pastor here, we're choosing someone who will sit on the Supreme Court for-conceivably-the next two decades, at least.

707 posted on 10/04/2005 3:41:06 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("I'm okay with being unimpressive. It helps me sleep better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 697 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Pete who?


708 posted on 10/04/2005 3:41:12 PM PDT by Doc Savage (...because they stand on a wall, and they say nothing is going to hurt you tonight, not on my watch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kevao

Please post a recent photo of your girth! Need to see it!


709 posted on 10/04/2005 3:42:07 PM PDT by Doc Savage (...because they stand on a wall, and they say nothing is going to hurt you tonight, not on my watch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
It's not a "leftie talking point."

SUre it is, Rush had a montage on yesterday with lefties in the MSM using it over and over again. Pretty funny until ANnie latched on to it, now she'll have to be added to the montage.

It's an ineluctable fact.

Scrappleface had a nice piece yesterday as well. It skewered your ineluctable fact. Pretty funny as well.

Simply because you choose to deny the obvious doesn't make it any less of a reality

Actually I think it is a grave sin for a POTUS to appoint people he knows and trusts to positions of critical improtance. He should use the lottery system and failing that a public hanging should commence forthwith.

710 posted on 10/04/2005 3:42:21 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

At least I finally know Ann is no BOT.


711 posted on 10/04/2005 3:43:22 PM PDT by devane617
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pageonetoo

And afterwards, what do you discuss?


712 posted on 10/04/2005 3:43:54 PM PDT by Doc Savage (...because they stand on a wall, and they say nothing is going to hurt you tonight, not on my watch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom

What are you talking about?


713 posted on 10/04/2005 3:44:12 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, Over there, we will be there until it is Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 705 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

The Scrappleface piece was an amusing piece of satire, but it only illustrated what everyone already knows, i.e. that this woman was only chosen because she is a close friend of President Bush.


714 posted on 10/04/2005 3:44:31 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("I'm okay with being unimpressive. It helps me sleep better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 710 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

YOU SAID... "He may think so, but he ain't gonna tell you why because if he does he's either going to PO the conservatives or the liberals."

Touting the qualifications of your candidate facilitates the confirmation process...not hinders it. Were talking qualifications...NOT idealogy.

Would you or somebody on this forum answer my question...how or why did a highly qualified CONSERVATIVE like Roberts get confirmed in this doomsday filibuster scenario some people are imagining?

Why cant the Roberts process happen again with another equally qualified known conservative?


715 posted on 10/04/2005 3:44:47 PM PDT by Dat Mon (still lookin for a good one....tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 693 | View Replies]

To: Dane
That's quite a broad brush you're painting with.

I'm not from New York, but I'm not far (Mark Levin grew up several miles from me). I have spoken to people throughout the United States and I've always thought the people in "fly over" country were the best.

716 posted on 10/04/2005 3:44:52 PM PDT by TAdams8591 (I am a Reagan Conservative and mighty proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 671 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Look .. I wish he picked Janice Rogers Brown. Am I disappointed??? Yes ... but that doesn't mean I am going to just throw his pick out the window because I don't know much about her.

I now have the same feeling. I've gone back and forth on this since yesterday.

I actually woke up in the middle of the night and realized that if she's confirmed and turns out to be another liberal, I couldn't vote for Guiliani in '08 like I would love to do (if he somehow manages to make it through the primaries, which is unlikely).

Someone posted that perhaps the president was thinking of the court as a whole; that makes sense. The facts that she's a Christian and that she's chosen Bush's appointees are reassuring.

And I'm starting to really like the idea of having someone from outside of the judiciary, and outside of the "elite" group. It's a good thing if a member of SCOTUS comes from a solid red state background--a breath of fresh air, in fact.

/rambling :)

717 posted on 10/04/2005 3:45:57 PM PDT by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 690 | View Replies]

To: devane617
At least I finally know Ann is no BOT

I'm not sure about that, she is a "kooky conservative bot" for CNN and MSNBC ala buchanan, IMO.

But what the hey she get's a paycheck from them, something she definately won't throw up.

718 posted on 10/04/2005 3:46:47 PM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 711 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle
Remarkable. I knew Gollum look familiar... :)
719 posted on 10/04/2005 3:46:48 PM PDT by SergeantsLady (I support my soldier by supporting the mission he believes in...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 702 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

If it is immaterial, then why did you bring it up? It seemed to matter to you.


720 posted on 10/04/2005 3:46:54 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, Over there, we will be there until it is Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 707 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 881-888 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson