Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ajolympian2004
Ann's choice, Janice Rogers-Brown. Not enough intestinal fortitude in the White House to go with that choice.

What a pity.

We can only hope now that Miers will be so mortified and fearful of appearing disloyal to Bush that she will not dare to stray from the strictest conservative line. Those of us who are outraged by her nomination serve an important function in that regard. She has got to hear loud and constant that she has no room for error, that if she takes the slightest Souter-style leftward drift, the memory and reputation of her mentor Bush will be sullied beyond cleansing among the conservatives who put him into the White House twice.

781 posted on 10/04/2005 6:21:33 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JCEccles; arasina
The idea that she would need to be influenced by others in order to come to any definitive, coherent conclusion on key Constitutional issues is the precise reason why should never have been nominated in the first place.

I don't want a Supreme Court justice that needs to be hectored into arriving at the proper decisions, I want one who knows what's right from the start and doesn't feel compelled to act only on the prompting of others.

786 posted on 10/04/2005 6:44:24 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("I'm okay with being unimpressive. It helps me sleep better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 781 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson