Skip to comments.(Part 2) Breaking on FR -- WASHINGTON POST Doing Blockbuster Story on Peter Paul and Hillary!
Posted on 10/07/2005 6:04:44 AM PDT by doug from upland
Photos, stories, documents, exhibits, civil lawsuit located at
The Hillary Clinton Accountability Project -- HillCAP.org
BREAKING STORY FROM OCT. 3
Amazingly, not even Hillary Clinton could not stop it. The WASHINTON POST MAGAZINE on Sunday, October 9 is running an 8,000-word cover story about the largest campaign finance fraud on record. The fraud occured during the 2000 senate race between then First Lady Hillary Clinton and New York Congressman Rick Lazio.
According to the government prosecutor's own numbers in the criminal trial of David Rosen, entrepreneur Peter Paul was induced to spend in excess of $1.2 million on a series of fundraisers for Hillary Clinton that culminated with the largest private concert Hollywood had ever seen. Paul actually believes the number was approximately $1.9 million.
The "Hollywood Gala Salute to President Clinton" was a farewell tribute to Bill and a fundraiser for Hillary. Paul spent the money with the promise that the President would join his company, Stan Lee Media, as a goodwill ambassador after he left the White House. Bill, Hillary, and several others are defendants in Paul's unprecedented and historic civil lawsuit. That lawsuit is expected to reach a Los Angeles superior courtroom early in 2006. Witnesses will include some of Hollywood's elite.
Paul will be receiving a copy of the story on Saturday. He is not yet certain of the final content but has been told that "the Clintons are not going to like it." That does not necessarily mean, however, that it will be a figurative stake to the heart of Hillary. Paul is also expecting the usual attacks on him.
The story could create shockwaves in Washington. Paul is not entirely sure why the WASHINGTON POST is doing the story at this time. After the trial of David Rosen trial, interest in the story, such as it was, died off in the mainstream media. The trial in the civil suit is still months away.
The timing could not be better. As Tom Delay faces charges regarding a matter that may or may not actually be a crime, this story will be front and center. It involves a massive coverup at the very highest levels of the Democratic Party -- Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, former DNC chair and current governor Ed Rendell, and former DNC chair Terry McAuliffe.
With full knowledge, Hillary allowed three fraudulent reports to be submitted to the FEC. Despite all of Paul's efforts to force Hillary to correct the record and return the illegal contribution, Hillary has remained untouchable and above the law.
Paul is prepared for the attacks that will be coming from the Clinton machine. That is their standard operating procedure -- attack the messenger. It wouldn't matter if he were Attilla the Hun. The documents, witnesses, and other evidence will tell the story.
Although the Rosen trial generated very little interest with the mainstream media, the civil trial is expected to feature an overflowing courtroom. "Hillary Clinton, raise your right hand." For those who have been hoping that the Clintons would one day be brought to justice, those words will be music to their ears. A word of caution to those who really despise the Clintons. This is a civil trial. The Clintons will not end up in Gitmo.
SPECIAL NOTE: It is expected that the hard-hitting documentary INDICTING HILLARY will be released during the campaign of 2006. INDICTING HILLARY chronicles her massive campaign finance fraud, her continuing failure to obey the law, her refusal to amend three fraudulent reports, and the aiding and abetting of her criminal conduct by a former president, William Jefferson Clinton, a current governor/former DNC chairman, Ed Rendell, and the immediate past DNC chairman, Terry McAuliffe. Hillary, you'd better put some ice on that.
Unfortunately, nothing will ever come of this.
A newspaper article indictment ? Yawn !
If the Washington COMPost Magazine is anything like the rag, it will be aimed at covering up the truth, not exposing it!
She's not my Mama, maybe Satan's.
Who at the Post doesn't like Hillry?
I greatly appreciate all of you who are working to advance the story. For those of you who want to sit there with a sour face and whine, I have a great thread for you --- THE OFFICIAL NOTHING WILL EVER HAPPEN TO HILLARY THREAD. That is a wonderful thread for negativity. You can type away and really feel good.
For those who didn't pay attention to the article, this is a civil trial. Hillary is not yet charged with a crime. Unfortunately, there appears to be no Ronnie Earle on the other side of the political aisle. But Hillary under oath in a trial that will receive massive coverage will be a sight to behold.
How is Rendell in all this? Alot of Pennsylvanians would like to see him go down.
Thbe only way this will get coverage is if the Coven-hooved One changes her name from a (D) to an (R)
I don't know. As disccused in the article, Peter isn't quite sure why they are doing it. Getting it out of the way so she can call it old news? That wouldn't require 8,000 words and a cover story.
But in 8,000 words, they will say something she doesn't like. Because it is the political paper of record in DC, it will get noticed.
Doug, I'm glad I didn't take your recommendation of a betting pool. LOL I would have lost big time!
Here's part 1 from Monday (October 3) for anyone who missed it:
Keep up the good work, Doug!!
Could be the Ted Kennedy/Howard Dean/Al Gore factions are trying to kill of the competition....
It really is curious why they would do this story now when it has not been in the news since the Rosen acquittal.
If you want to ask Peter a question on this thread, put it in red so he can easily see it while scrolling down the thread.
Does someone at the POST not like Hillary and believes that she cannot win?
This picture reminds me of "mamma" on the Carol Burnett show. She is one mean lady who knows how to play the game and nothing seems to stick to these people. Problem is all these scandals are coming out too early by election 2006 and 2008 they are as they say "old new" from the right wing conspiracy is dregging up. I just wish something would stick to get her charged with something.
Didn't they have a storage unit somewhere in Arkansas - sure would like a tornado come come through and spread all the hidden documents. unlike Schumer, they have their FBI files on everyone under lock and key.
As a Pennsylvanian, I would like to see some change in Harrisburg. Very curious as to what fast Eddie's role was.
Sorry, that should be "Don" Cuomo
My continuing prediction: Hillary will not be the Democrat nominee in 2006...
My continuing prediction: Hillary will not be the Democrat nominee in 2008...
Strike post 30...
We hope you are right. But it will not take just wishing it so. We hope that the civil trial, combined with the documentary INDICTING HILLARY will damage her sufficiently.
Wow! She looks spent!
When the Left assesses clintoncorruption (treason, rape, or whatever), a clown-like character of the crime or the criminal is the reliable default mitigating factor, with the magnitude of the mitigation directly proportional to both the intensity of clownlike affect and the seriousness of the crime and inversely related to the distance to an election in which a clinton is running.
WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS
FOR THE CHILDREN,
FOR THE WORLD
madhillary.com (coming soon)
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005
"What, me worry?"
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM AS CLOSE AS
A CLINTON TO OVAL OFFICE
how the clintons are handling
the hillary dud factor
Face the music, get it out, get it over. By a year from now old news.
Or so goes the hope.
It didn't take 8,000 words to do that. It won't be old news because she is still facing the civil trial. This time there will be coverage. Bill, Hillary, Rendell, McAuliffe, Grossman, and many others raising their right hands will make for a blockbuster event.
This is a serious issue and the WP is seeking to inoculate the Hildabeast from this issue before the 08' election. Their going to take the lead on it and the story will be told and timed in a way to mitigate it's effect.
Mark my words.
Perhaps, the whole DeLay "scandal" is being used as flack so they can cover for Mrs.Clinton? After all, it's politics, everyone does this stuff, and it's so complicated.
If even Hillary MADE MISTAKES - it must be extremely complex.
Good work, Doug.
Up to now, it certainly has been true that Nothing Bad Can Happen to Bill or Hillary.
I doubt whether either of them will ever get the jail time they deserve for their multiple felonies, but it could be that at some point the Democratic establishment will turn against them. The clintons continue to stand in the limelight and suck up publicity, putting every other Democrat into the shade. As long as they continue active, no one else has a chance. Maybe at some point the worms will turn, and decide to nail them, just to get them out of the way.
Hillary certainly has done that to a lot of Democrats. She was almost singlehandedly behind the newspaper articles that wrecked Dean when he was riding high in the 2004 campaign in Iowa. It wasn't conservative newspapers that brought down Dean, it was the MSM, at hillary's bidding I'm fairly sure. Now maybe they will bring her down.
Does Teddy really want Hillary on trial? That would mean that his wife's brother is once again going to court. Nothing new for the Reggie family, however.
I was wondering...where is Ray Reggie these days? He's not in jail, right? What's he up to? Is he in New Orleans? Did the Clintons meet with him when they went down to New Orleans right after the flood?
A documentary entitled INDICTING HILLARY will be ignored by the Stone Age Press. It will be panned by the reviewers. It will be deflected as just more from the VRWC. Here's hoping the filmmakers change the title to something less incendiary, such as MILLENNIUM GODDESS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.