Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Robotic Vehicles Contend for the Battlefield
NY Times ^ | October 8, 2005 | JOHN MARKOFF

Posted on 10/08/2005 4:04:38 PM PDT by neverdem

PRIMM, Nev., Oct. 8 - Fifteen robotic vehicles sprinted through the Nevada desert Saturday afternoon, closing in on a $2 million prize from the Pentagon meant to spur development of technologies for 21st century automated warfare.

The vehicles were the survivors from an original starting field of 23 teams fielded by alliances of computer, automotive and aerospace companies, university researchers and others.

The competition, called the Grand Challenge, was organized by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or Darpa, and was designed to tap into the talents of a wide range of researchers and innovators who might not otherwise be found by the nation's military technology firms. Darpa gave birth to the Internet's predecessor, the Arpanet, along with the Predator drone and the stealth fighter.

The second Grand Challenge was run on a new 131.6 mile course, laid out over dusty unpaved roads, mountain passes and flat lake beds north of the gambling town of Primm on the California border.

At the halfway mark on the course, the contest grew tense as five leaders stayed close together, averaging slightly more than 20 miles an hour. There were a number of stalls and a dramatic crash directly in front of an audience viewing area when Alice, created by the California Institute of Technology, plowed into a concrete barrier and then attempted to drive over it.

At the 102-mile mark, Stanley, a Volkswagen from Stanford, took the lead, passing a Hummer outfitted by Carnegie Mellon.

Near the end of the course the robots were set to run through Beer Bottle Pass, which included a cliff with a 100-foot drop. The course also passed through several tunnels where the vehicles would be cut off from satellite navigation signals.

A number of the competitors were repeat entrants, but the start of this year's race...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Technical; US: District of Columbia; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: carnegiemellonu; darpa; dod; grandchallenge; hummer; roboticvehicles; robots; stanford; vw; winners
DARPA ANNOUNCES GRAND CHALLENGE FINALISTS


Jim Wilson/The New York Times
Twenty-three vehicles will compete on a desert course on Saturday. Unlike the last race, participants believe there will be a winner this year. (The bot in that pic appears to be one of the smaller ones. The bots in their slide show pics appear much larger. The video didn't download for me when I tried.)

1 posted on 10/08/2005 4:04:40 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

> Unlike the last race, participants believe there
> will be a winner this year.

There will be. Three have already finished under the
prize time.

See earlier thread also:
Robotic racers gear up for desert
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1498928/posts

and of course the GC site:
http://www.grandchallenge.org/


2 posted on 10/08/2005 4:09:30 PM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

Thanks for the ilnks!


3 posted on 10/08/2005 4:13:27 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Just a bit frightening.
We will have robotic transport vehicles. Remote piloted and autonomous armed aircraft to replace cannon cockers, tankers and pilots. Small remotely operated armed vehicles to replace the grunts.
When this happens, the only Warrior Heroes will be enemy. We will no longer have the excuse to stay away from war that too many Americans will be killed or wounded. The only constraint on engaging in war will be budgetary.


4 posted on 10/08/2005 4:13:31 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

Just a bit frightening


Mayor Nagin


5 posted on 10/08/2005 4:18:36 PM PDT by al baby (Father of the beeber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

I agree...
Did you ever see that Star Trek episode that involved two planets engaged in interplanetary war? Seems they both agreed that convential weapons were just too uncivilized.
So they used a computer program to simulate weapon deployment and damage...then the "simulated" casualties were notified to show up to a disentagration chamber for disposal.
Moral was war had become too civilized and no horror existed to urge leaders to settle.
I fear that's where we're headed


6 posted on 10/08/2005 6:30:04 PM PDT by jcparks (LFOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jcparks

can you name a war, EVER, which ended because the leaders were forced by horror to seek settlement?

seems to me that every war and large scale conflict since the rise of Rome (at least) ended when one, the other, or all participants lost the logistical capacity and/or command structure required to continue to fight.


7 posted on 10/09/2005 12:38:04 AM PDT by King Prout (19sep05 - I want at least 2 Saiga-12 shotguns. If you have leads, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Him too.


8 posted on 10/09/2005 3:16:17 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jcparks

One of their better anti-war episodes.


9 posted on 10/09/2005 3:17:42 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
When this happens, the only Warrior Heroes will be enemy. We will no longer have the excuse to stay away from war that too many Americans will be killed or wounded. The only constraint on engaging in war will be budgetary.

You say that like it is a bad thing. Technology is just a tool. And it is a far better alternative than the draft.

10 posted on 10/09/2005 3:39:40 AM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jcparks

Which episode is that? I never saw it.


11 posted on 10/09/2005 3:45:35 AM PDT by Paul_Denton (Stom ta jora UN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
seems to me that every war and large scale conflict since the rise of Rome (at least) ended when one, the other, or all participants lost the logistical capacity and/or command structure required to continue to fight.

Well Japan in WWII comes to mind right off the bat. Desert Storm did not end that way, nor the Korean conflict.

Wolf
12 posted on 10/10/2005 1:30:12 AM PDT by RunningWolf (tag line limbo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
And it is a far better alternative than the draft.

What would the draft have to do with it? I doubt we will ever see it reinstated – unless the democrats regain control of Congress.
13 posted on 10/10/2005 3:30:05 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson