Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clooney film not high on facts
WorldNetDaily ^ | 10/8/05 | Tom Snyder

Posted on 10/08/2005 4:09:11 PM PDT by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: al baby

Thanks Al. Smart people, and great wit too!


21 posted on 10/08/2005 4:22:10 PM PDT by calrighty ( Terrorists are like cockroaches . Kill em all soon, so they will find out there ain't no virgins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Didnt FDR laugh and say that he didnt care that soviet agents were in his administration?


It just shows you-- if the lied about McCarthy going that far back, what ELSE did they lie about? Don't answer that...you could fill a library with all the lies have been told by the Enemy Within.


22 posted on 10/08/2005 4:22:59 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite ( Mike Pence for President!!! http://acuf.org/issues/issue34/050415pol.asp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Scarchin

It wouldn't surprise me if Murrow has a "No Smoking" sign on his desk!


23 posted on 10/08/2005 4:23:37 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Clooney film not high on facts

Now THATS a revelation!

nyuk, nyuk!

24 posted on 10/08/2005 4:24:13 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
Hopefully, audiences will stay away in droves.

I think you can bank on it...the bulk of the movie-going demographics just ain't that interested in "ancient political history", let alone a B/W 'art film'...

Clooney's this decade's version of that actor (See - I can't even remember his name*) that decided he was smart enough to 'produce' and came up with things like "Waterworks".

*(Costner...finally popped in)

25 posted on 10/08/2005 4:24:42 PM PDT by ErnBatavia (Like a midget at a urinal - stay on your toes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I've got the picture, but I don't know how to post it. I'll gladly e-mail it to someone who can - galamaga@verizon.net


26 posted on 10/08/2005 4:34:48 PM PDT by Scarchin (www.classdismissedblog.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee


"Clooney film not high on facts"

Since when did liberals ever believe in facts?


27 posted on 10/08/2005 4:38:22 PM PDT by dmw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The world according to Hollywood. There are never any facts involved.


28 posted on 10/08/2005 5:11:35 PM PDT by abigailsmybaby ("This is the sort of English up with which I will not put." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scarchin; wagglebee


Who wrote the joke postit note? (They should have left it off so we'd see more of the picture)
29 posted on 10/08/2005 5:12:33 PM PDT by visualops (www.visualops.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
As such, it offers mainly emotional, bombastic arguments and lots of style, but not much substance.

In other words, it's more of the same quintessential drivel from the Left. Why bother with facts when one can present flashy fiction and pass it off as facts?

30 posted on 10/08/2005 5:20:17 PM PDT by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Siena Dreaming
This movie will be fun. I hope it's discussed a lot. Would be great to get a good McCarthy debate out there in the public domain

It really does seem counterproductive, from the lefts perspective to stimulate discussion about McCarthy. They couldn't possibly demonize him any further than they have already succeeded at doing.

Do they feel the need to impose the myth upon the younger generations that may not have yet assimilated the McCarthyism myth? I don't see them sitting still to watch this movie and those youths who would be curious enough to watch this movie probably will have a more jaundiced eye than their parents in that they have likely had some exposure to the truth, being internet aware, and be more aware of the Ratheresque tendencies of the media, especially the network that employed Morrow.

31 posted on 10/08/2005 5:24:11 PM PDT by Jim_Curtis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: visualops

Thanks!

The water bottle slays me!


32 posted on 10/08/2005 5:27:52 PM PDT by Scarchin (www.classdismissedblog.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

That's H'weird--someone's fantasy. Anyway, don't plan on seeing Clooney the Tooney in anything anymore.


33 posted on 10/08/2005 5:31:01 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scarchin

Lots of movies have errors like that, some are very funny. One famous one is the electric bulb in the Atlanta street-lamp in Gone With the Wind.
One would think though, that nowadays set people wouldn't make such a mistake in a period piece.


34 posted on 10/08/2005 5:51:21 PM PDT by visualops (www.visualops.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"I've always been puzzled by the national news media's fascination with these McCarthy programs by Murrow and his team. They show a tendency to editorialize rather than use hard facts and rational arguments, and an inclination to avoid honest debate. Ironically, the same journalists who extol Murrow seem to look down their noses at Bill O'Reilly of Fox News, whose news commentaries and editorials are far more journalistically and factually sound, though perhaps just as bombastic (in their own way) as Murrow's."
35 posted on 10/08/2005 8:28:01 PM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

i'd say that its worth seeing, even if innacurate. its fiction remember.. I don't buy any of the crap, but it doesn't mean I ddin't enjoy JFK.. then again, I liked Scarface too...


36 posted on 10/09/2005 12:55:20 AM PDT by Schwaeky (The Republic, will be reorganized into the first American EMPIRE, for a safe and secure society!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

George Clooney's career...uh, what career?


37 posted on 10/09/2005 4:20:03 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scarchin
This is the picture that's up on Fox news online right now. Looks like they edited out the water bottle- but you can see traces of it.


38 posted on 10/09/2005 5:33:19 AM PDT by visualops (www.visualops.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Just finished re-reading the newest book on McCarthy. He was a great American and none of the previous books on him had been written after the declassification of Venona.

The central question of the McCarthy investigation was never answered: Who promoted Irving Peress?

39 posted on 10/09/2005 7:03:48 AM PDT by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: visualops

Shakespeare had those sort of mistakes. There are clocks in Julius Carsar.


40 posted on 10/11/2005 2:52:30 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson