Posted on 10/10/2005, 5:54:42 AM by Dyaus Pitar
Ten members of two hindu families were killed by a group of militants in Rajouri district of Jammu and Kashmir early today, police said.
The militants first entered the residence of one Munshi Ram in Kandi village of Budhal tehsil, had food and then killed the inmates, including a woman, by slitting their throats, they said. Two of the dead have been identified as Munshi Ram and his son Kala Chand, they said.
After escaping from the scene, the militants went to Mohra Gabbar village in the same tehsil, barged into the house of one Kartar Singh and killed five persons and injured another.
Police and security forces have rushed to the two villages. They are likely to launch an operation to track down the militants responsible for the ghastly incident.
I await the happy day when jihadi Muslims are all - to a man - killed as they have killed the innocent.
Oh, wait a minute....
Time for a roach motel.
They truly are subhuman savages. They need to be rendered extinct as a species. Anyone who thinks civilized people can share the planet with these heathens is insane.
Obviously, the earthquake didn't kill enough of Islamist bastards..
Guess we'll have to do it ourself...
Semper Fi
We must not forget that not all Muslims are terrorists. Therefore we shouldn't wish death (Not that we should wish death on anyone period)on an entire religious group. In some cases that would be considered genocide if such a thing were to occur. Keep that in mind at all times.
When muslims finally get sick and tired enough of jihadis, they won't be long for this world. But when will that happen? It seems that muslims have an extremely high tolerance for barbarism.
"There was growing fear last night for the safety of a German tourist who was apparently abducted by a group of militants in Kashmir who marched him into the mountains at gunpoint.
"The tourist, whose name is believed to be Harfurth Rolf, has not been seen for a week. The truck in which he had hitched a lift in the remote region of Zanskar, which is popular with backpackers, was hijacked by five militants, three of them armed."
"When the truck was flagged down shortly afterwards by four Buddhist monks, the militants panicked. They shot three of the monks dead."
"Mr Rolf's abduction appears to be the first in Kashmir since six trekkers, including the Britons Keith Mangan and Paul Wells, were kidnapped in July 1995." "They are presumed dead, although their bodies, and those of their fellow hostages, a German and an American, have never been found. One hostage, an American, escaped. Another, a Norwegian, was beheaded."
I saw film or pictures of some of these young men in the hands of their kidnappers. This was pre-911, pre-Afgan invasion, and pre-Iraq invasion. I have very little sympathy for the people that live in this region.
I didn't wish death for "all Muslims"....I wanted more Islamists to die....
That was a clear distinction, for those that know the difference and can read.
Not all Germans were Nazis either, but we bombed the hell out of Germany....
Frankly, I don't understand why we have spared the "Muslim Cities" where large concentrations of Jihadists live or find support...
If you're concerned about "genocide", you should be troubled by the fate the Islamists have clearly stated is their goal for non-muslims.....
They mean to kill or enslave all non-muslims...
So keep your silly advice to yourself.... I'm too old to listen to fools.
Semper Fi
I think we can all agree that we can share Pluto with them. In fact, we could give it to them free of charge.
Islamists mean to enslave all people... under Islam. Including Muslims.
How else can you describe the Islamic extremists tendency to kill and wreak havoc among their own kind? When Muslims voice dissent with the terrorists, they kill the dissenters. They mean to enslave everyone regardless of their beliefs - Muslim, Christian, Hindu... Not Jews though... Jews they intend to slaughter wholesale. Something about a past of oppression and ... no wait - that can't be right...
Something smells around here...
You should be concerned about muslims who endlessly preach hatred, murder, genocide, suicide-for-sex, and subhuman evil every day.
I simply stated the distinction because some in the forums were confusing jihadists with all muslims.
With the idea of bombimg Islamic cities; While it may quench your thirst for revenge, we are not dealing with one collective country here. Germany was easy to bomb because we knew where Germany was. The terrorists we are combating do not function out of one collective state or country. You cannot go around blaming certain cities for their actions. And then proceed to bomb them. We are not fighting in a conventional war.
Also, you keep trying to create a difference between Islamist and Muslims when frankly they are the same thing.
Tell it to the Shia Muslims of Pakistani Kashmir who were slaughtered in the mid90's by Osama's goons and the Pakistani army.
They wives were taken as booty as these areas were ethnically cleansed of Shia men.
Islamist = Islamofascist = Those who promote the virulent ideology of a medieval Islamic empire and are willing to employ terror tactics to realize their ambition.
To target Islamists for ridicule, threats and violence should be encouraged in the context of maintaining and expanding freedom, particularly freedom of religion. But you suggest the fight cannot be looked at in terms of cities… Make no mistake; cities in the free world are targeted everyday with Islamist hate speech that occasionally erupts in terrorist violence. Alternatively there are specific cities associated to Islamic fascism [Tehran, among others] and although bombing them may not be the best solution, the fascists who live there must be fought. To your point, we should be sensitive to the inhabitants who live in these capitols of terror, if they are fighting the terror masters. I however find it difficult to muster up much sympathy for inhabitants that simply live in fear of the terror masters, or expats who retreat to cities in the free world. It goes without saying that not all Muslims subscribe to the backward plans of a few, but the question is, what are they willing to do about the situation? And my question to you is; who are you ultimately protecting by diffusing the threat? If this thread were to exchange the word Jihadist with Islamist, would you agree with it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.