Posted on 10/11/2005 2:47:02 PM PDT by flattorney
AUSTIN -- Dick DeGuerin, lawyer for indicted Rep. Tom DeLay on Tuesday subpoenaed the prosecuting Texas district attorney in an effort to show he acted improperly with grand jurors.
The subpoena for Travis County District Attorney Ronnie Earle, filed in Austin, asked that the prosecutor and two of his assistants appear in court to explain their conduct.
The lawyers, previously had filed a motion asking for dismissal of the conspiracy and money-laundering charges against DeLay, the former House majority leader who has stepped aside from that post because of the indictment.
Dick DeGuerin, DeLay's attorney, also asked that grand jurors be released from their secrecy oath so they could answer questions about the prosecutor's conduct.
UPDATE
Indicted Rep. Tom DeLay's defense team tried Tuesday to serve Texas prosecutor Ronnie Earle with a subpoena, but Earle refused to accept it, DeLay lawyer Dick DeGuerin said.
Alleging misconduct with grand jurors, the defense team wants to compel Earle to explain his behavior.
A state campaign finance investigation conducted by Earle led to DeLay's indictment on conspiracy and money laundering charges. DeLay, R-Texas, was obligated by House Republican rules to temporarily step aside as House majority leader.
DeGuerin said acceptance of the subpoena was voluntary Tuesday because it had not been stamped by a court official, but added the defense team would go through the court procedure Wednesday and redeliver it. He said Earle, district attorney for Travis County, would then be obligated to accept the subpoena, but could file a motion to have it dismissed.
The defense lawyer, who is trying to get the indictments dismissed, said an assistant district attorney also refused to accept her subpoena, but a second assistant accepted the subpoena delivered to him. Acceptance simply involves signing a paper acknowledging delivery.
The subpoenas asked that the prosecutor and the two assistants appear in court or submit to a deposition in which the defense lawyers would question them.
DeGuerin also asked that grand jurors be released from their secrecy oath so they could answer questions about the prosecutor's conduct.
Earle's office said in a written statement, "Because of laws protecting grand jury secrecy, there are limitations to what we can say at this time, but we fully expect to prevail in this matter."
DeGuerin wants Earle to answer 12 questions about conversations he had with grand jurors, including whether the prosecutor became angry when a grand jury decided against an indictment of DeLay and why that decision was not publicly released.
He also wants to know the details of Earle's conversation with William Gibson, foreman of a grand jury that indicted DeLay on conspiracy charges, whose term has since ended.
"If you did nothing improper, you should not be concerned about answering these questions," DeGuerin said in his letter to Earle.
Earle, leading a Texas campaign finance investigation that indicted DeLay and two political associates, went to three grand juries. He presented evidence on DeLay's alleged role in funneling corporate money to Texas legislative candidates in violation of state law.
The first grand jury indicted DeLay on conspiracy charges, the second failed to indict and the third indicted him on an allegation of money laundering. DeLay has said he is innocent of wrongdoing.
DeLay has accused Earle _ a Democrat _ of pursuing the case against him for political reasons. Earle has denied any political motives.
In a motion filed last week, the defense team said that from Sept. 29 through Oct. 3, Earle and his staff "unlawfully participated in grand jury deliberations and attempted to browbeat and coerce" the grand jury that refused to indict DeLay.
The motion said Earle then attempted to cover up and delay public disclosure of the refusal, and also "incited" the foreman of the first grand jury to violate grand jury secrecy by talking publicly about the case _ in an effort to influence grand jurors still sitting.
The foreman, William Gibson, gave media interviews after the grand jury finished its work but told The Associated Press that Earle did not ask him to discuss the case.
"That's a bunch of (expletive) there," Gibson said. "That man did not talk to me."
He said Earle advised him and other grand jurors to keep an open mind as they considered evidence and cautioned them, "What goes on behind closed doors is secret."
The lawyers said Earle then spoke about the case with members of the first grand jury, whose work was finished, to get their opinion of what they might have done if they had known their conspiracy indictment was flawed _ as defense attorneys alleged.
Earle then submitted the grand jury opinions to the third grand jury to persuade it to hand down the money laundering indictment, the defense team contended.
The indictments against DeLay triggered a House Republican rule that forced him to step aside _ at least temporarily _ from his post as majority leader.
Both indictments of DeLay focused on an alleged scheme to move money around and conceal the use of corporate contributions to support Texas Republican legislative candidates. State law prohibits use of corporate donations to support or oppose state candidates, allowing the money to go only for administrative expenses.
DeGuerin is asking for all documents, notes, telephone records and other relevant materials from Earle's staff.
"I am determined to put on record the steps taken by you and your staff to obtain a replacement indictment against my client, Tom DeLay," DeGuerin said in a letter to the prosecutor.
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/10/11/D8D66AU00.html
Great thread!
It seems Delay is a member of the "There's no kill like overkill" club.
Good for him. Go get em !!!!!
Thank goodness DeLay has some stones (unlike many of his republican peers) and refuses to turn the other cheek. Or to whine about how mean Earl is while grabbing his ankles and taking it.
Earl and his accomplices are probably a little surprised DeLay doesn't lead with his chin like most pussy pubbies.
I wish I could think of something brilliant and articulate to say about this news, but this is all I can think of...
AHAHAHA! AHAHA!
How about......YES!
A few snips from a current article:
WASHINGTON Oct 11, 2005 — Indicted Rep. Tom DeLay's defense team tried Tuesday to serve Texas prosecutor Ronnie Earle with a subpoena, but Earle refused to accept it, DeLay lawyer Dick DeGuerin said.
Alleging misconduct with grand jurors, the defense team wants to compel Earle to explain his behavior.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=1204670&page=1
DeGuerin said acceptance of the subpoena was voluntary Tuesday because it had not been stamped by a court official, but added the defense team would go through the court procedure Wednesday and redeliver it. He said Earle, district attorney for Travis County, would then be obligated to accept the subpoena, but could file a motion to have it dismissed.
"DeGuerin is asking for all documents, notes, telephone records and other relevant materials from Earle's staff."
"I am determined to put on record the steps taken by you and your staff to obtain a replacement indictment against my client, Tom DeLay," DeGuerin said in a letter to the prosecutor."
"Earle then submitted the grand jury opinions to the third grand jury to persuade it to hand down the money laundering indictment, the defense team contended."
"In a motion filed last week, the defense team said that from Sept. 29 through Oct. 3, Earle and his staff "unlawfully participated in grand jury deliberations and attempted to browbeat and coerce" the grand jury that refused to indict DeLay."
As I listened to DD argue to the judge, one part of my brain kept thinking how reasonable he sounded even though another part of my brain knew he was wrong.
Looks like my post #88 was just a more recent re-hash of yours....sorry for that.
At least you'll get a couple more bumps on this thread!
It is not enough to just push Earle out of a job, he has to loose the law license as a message to other prosecutors.
Earle is not the only prosecutor who plays this game.
It is not enough to just push Earle out of a job, he has to loose the law license as a message to other prosecutors.
Earle is not the only prosecutor who plays this game.
And my respect for BOTH the lawyer and the Congressman just went up a big notch.
ping!
Is Earle still filming this?I heard someone was making a documentary about the DeLay indictments,and were accompayning Earle through the process.
From your mouth to God's ear..........
Some lawyers DO wear white hats after all!
Hopefully, this will teach the slime bucket, Ronnie Earle NOT to bring a knife to a gunfight.
BTW: What the story regarding DU's supposed frivolity and elation over Karl Rove's upcoming "Frog March From The White House"???
Jack.
The problem is, in Texas, he *can't* hide behind his office in this case.
Texas law is as clear as crystal in the matter.
Guess what happens to him if he is convicted of official misconduct in the state of Texas.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.