Posted on 10/11/2005 5:09:15 PM PDT by wagglebee
A conservative professor at Washington University in St. Louis is under fire from students for declaring on his faculty website that homosexuality is sinful.
A small firestorm began after senior Jeff Stepp wrote an article in the student newspaper Student Life, arguing that Professor Jonathan Katz's views on homosexuality should be removed from the faculty website. In his column, Stepp rejects the professor's reasoning but says he is most disturbed by the fact that Katz's essays -- including one entitled "In Defense of Homophobia" -- are hosted on web space that is owned by the school and funded by student tuition.
Now some homosexual students are saying the school should remove Katz's remarks from the website. But Katz says he has yet to hear from administrators.
"I think they understand that if they try to pressure someone for presenting a reasoned exposition of his views or any exposition of his views, they'll be violating their trust as administrators of an institution of learning, and they will really look bad," the educator says. "I think they correctly realize the best procedure for them is to be completely silent -- and so they have been."
Along with his essays, Katz issues a disclaimer that his opinion pieces "represent his personal views alone," and that "Washington University would never take an official position which might deviate from the 'politically correct' line." In his essay discussing homophobia, Katz refers to himself as "a homophobe, and proud," and says homophobia is a "moral judgment upon acts engaged in by choice."
Katz claims his opponents have a double standard. "The interesting thing is that the people who went public in Student Life are overwhelmingly against. In fact," he says, "the first wave was all in favor of censorship."
The physics professor says that reaction caused him to wonder. "I said to myself, 'Hey, these people call themselves liberals and their reaction to something they disagree with is censorship?' That's weird, isn't it?" he asks.
According to Katz, private correspondence tends to run 2-to-1 in favor of his being allowed to state his opinions. But he adds that even though the university is supposed to be a place for open discussion of controversial issues, there is something seriously wrong on campus when people privately tell him they fear being shunned for publicly supporting him.
LOL
Which is not per se a defense of homosexuality, but I do not see where homosexuality trumps the first amendment of the US Constitution. I should be able to hate who I wish without the government giving a damn.
Hmmm ... homosexuals are heterophobic. Why not? What's good for the goose is good for the gander, so to speak.
Apropos to nothing, I actually know the guy who first coined the phrase, HOMOPHOBIA. True.
The commments you apparently disagree with are still where they posted them -on another topic where your comments might even be relevant -unless you have some agenda you wish to elaborate upon?
This guy better be looking over his shoulder and sleeping with one eye open.
Whatever happened to Academic Freedom? The libs whine on and on about it when a radical leftist professor comes under any kind of criticism but the second a conservative prof opens his mouth they jump all over him like a pack of wild dogs. Hypocrites.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.