Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This looks like a classic. [I put in some bolding, underlining, and bracketted comments.]
1 posted on 10/12/2005 3:10:30 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
SciencePing
An elite subset of the Evolution list.
See the list's explanation at my freeper homepage.
Then FReepmail to be added or dropped.

2 posted on 10/12/2005 3:12:05 AM PDT by PatrickHenry ( I won't respond to a troll, crackpot, retard, or incurable ignoramus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Upshot of this is that an electron needs two alibis.


3 posted on 10/12/2005 3:12:12 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
Is it that we can establish that an electron is at two places at the same time, or that there is no way that we can establish that it is not?
4 posted on 10/12/2005 3:15:08 AM PDT by BikerNYC (Modernman should not have been banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

I knew that.........


5 posted on 10/12/2005 3:26:58 AM PDT by yer gonna put yer eye out (Will quip for food...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Still doesn't disprove the theory that " The angle of the dangle....."


7 posted on 10/12/2005 3:32:41 AM PDT by leadhead (It’s a duty and a responsibility to defeat them. But it's also a pleasure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
This experiment offers some insight to some heretofore unexplained phenomena:

- It seems that democratic voters in some big cities exhibit the tendency to appear at multiple voting booths at the same time. Perhaps a single door (slit) at the polling place could cause these people to act more like particles and travel to only one booth?!

- Rose law firm records both existed and didn't exist at the same time. Maybe we need to view them as particles to limit their ability to behave in wavelike (unexplainable paths to reach their destination) manner.

Just a couple of real world scenarios that might benefit from this observation.
9 posted on 10/12/2005 3:35:23 AM PDT by will of the people
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Can the Transporter be far behing???

Beam me up Scotty!


10 posted on 10/12/2005 3:39:46 AM PDT by Vaquero ("An armed society is a polite society" R. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cagey

I'm not sure but I think a nuetron can.


11 posted on 10/12/2005 3:40:57 AM PDT by ShadowDancer (Stupid people make my brain sad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

bookmark


13 posted on 10/12/2005 4:05:40 AM PDT by tentmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

the first time that electrons have characteristics of both waves and particles at the same time and in virtually the push of a button can be switched back and forth between these states


this statment seems to really tell it all .....

the on - off ... one or zero ... the fundamental key to computing . Talk about a "micro" processer ..


14 posted on 10/12/2005 4:18:37 AM PDT by THEUPMAN (#### comment deleted by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

That electron voted for the $87 Billion, before it voted against it!


15 posted on 10/12/2005 4:19:27 AM PDT by gridlock (Eliminate Perverse Incentives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
". In addition, the researchers succeeded in proving something long doubted: that a disruption of the reflective symmetry of this molecule leads to a partial loss of coherence through the introduction of two different heavy isotopes, in this case N14 and N15" I've been saying that since my 12th birthday...but did anyone listen? Noooooooo...
21 posted on 10/12/2005 4:29:07 AM PDT by Capitalism2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

22 posted on 10/12/2005 4:29:40 AM PDT by Ichneumon (Certified pedantic coxcomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
For an alternative description of the electron (with some experimental evidence) check this out: http://www.blacklightpower.com/
27 posted on 10/12/2005 5:24:35 AM PDT by RazzPutin ("You have told us more than you can possibly know." -- Niels Bohr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
It can, according to Heisenberg. But I'm not sure.

And neither was he.

28 posted on 10/12/2005 5:25:13 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

32 posted on 10/12/2005 6:00:27 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
Indeed, quantum physics has simply come to accept as a given over the years that there does not seem to be an independent reality. Physics has ceased questioning this, because experiments have confirmed it repeatedly and with a growing accuracy.

Codswallop. If an electron is in two places, it doesn't mean that there's no independent reality. It means that the independent reality is that the electron is in both places. "No independent reality" would mean that the electron is over here for me and over there for you, but this doesn't happen, not in quantum theory, and not in experiment.

If there were no such thing as independent reality, there'd be no possibility of a science of physics.

33 posted on 10/12/2005 6:05:01 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
electrons - "both/and" and "either/or" exist side-by-side.

The Kerry Effect

35 posted on 10/12/2005 6:14:33 AM PDT by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

If evolution is a random series of events proceeding from the simple to the complex, exactly how do you explain the de-evolution of our species as personified by Matt Lauer and Katie Couric?


37 posted on 10/12/2005 6:22:29 AM PDT by Doc Savage (...because they stand on a wall, and they say nothing is going to hurt you tonight, not on my watch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

I am beginning to believe that “wave” and “particle” are artificial constructs we have created as a result of living and observing in the macro world for so long. In “reality” (what ever it may be) everything is composed of wave like particles – or particle like waves. Maybe a new word is needed.


38 posted on 10/12/2005 6:29:09 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson