This looks like a classic. [I put in some bolding, underlining, and bracketted comments.]
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
SciencePing |
An elite subset of the Evolution list. See the list's explanation at my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail to be added or dropped. |
|
|
|
2 posted on
10/12/2005 3:12:05 AM PDT by
PatrickHenry
( I won't respond to a troll, crackpot, retard, or incurable ignoramus.)
To: PatrickHenry
Upshot of this is that an electron needs two alibis.
3 posted on
10/12/2005 3:12:12 AM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
To: PatrickHenry
Is it that we can establish that an electron is at two places at the same time, or that there is no way that we can establish that it is not?
4 posted on
10/12/2005 3:15:08 AM PDT by
BikerNYC
(Modernman should not have been banned.)
To: PatrickHenry
To: PatrickHenry
Still doesn't disprove the theory that " The angle of the dangle....."
7 posted on
10/12/2005 3:32:41 AM PDT by
leadhead
(It’s a duty and a responsibility to defeat them. But it's also a pleasure)
To: PatrickHenry
This experiment offers some insight to some heretofore unexplained phenomena:
- It seems that democratic voters in some big cities exhibit the tendency to appear at multiple voting booths at the same time. Perhaps a single door (slit) at the polling place could cause these people to act more like particles and travel to only one booth?!
- Rose law firm records both existed and didn't exist at the same time. Maybe we need to view them as particles to limit their ability to behave in wavelike (unexplainable paths to reach their destination) manner.
Just a couple of real world scenarios that might benefit from this observation.
To: PatrickHenry
Can the Transporter be far behing???
Beam me up Scotty!
10 posted on
10/12/2005 3:39:46 AM PDT by
Vaquero
("An armed society is a polite society" R. Heinlein)
To: Cagey
I'm not sure but I think a nuetron can.
11 posted on
10/12/2005 3:40:57 AM PDT by
ShadowDancer
(Stupid people make my brain sad.)
To: PatrickHenry
To: PatrickHenry
the first time that electrons have characteristics of both waves and particles at the same time and in virtually the push of a button can be switched back and forth between these states
this statment seems to really tell it all .....
the on - off ... one or zero ... the fundamental key to computing . Talk about a "micro" processer ..
14 posted on
10/12/2005 4:18:37 AM PDT by
THEUPMAN
(#### comment deleted by moderator)
To: PatrickHenry
That electron voted for the $87 Billion, before it voted against it!
15 posted on
10/12/2005 4:19:27 AM PDT by
gridlock
(Eliminate Perverse Incentives)
To: PatrickHenry
". In addition, the researchers succeeded in proving something long doubted: that a disruption of the reflective symmetry of this molecule leads to a partial loss of coherence through the introduction of two different heavy isotopes, in this case N14 and N15" I've been saying that since my 12th birthday...but did anyone listen? Noooooooo...
To: PatrickHenry
22 posted on
10/12/2005 4:29:40 AM PDT by
Ichneumon
(Certified pedantic coxcomb)
To: PatrickHenry
27 posted on
10/12/2005 5:24:35 AM PDT by
RazzPutin
("You have told us more than you can possibly know." -- Niels Bohr)
To: PatrickHenry
It can, according to Heisenberg. But I'm not sure.
And neither was he.
28 posted on
10/12/2005 5:25:13 AM PDT by
IronJack
To: PatrickHenry
32 posted on
10/12/2005 6:00:27 AM PDT by
Gumlegs
To: PatrickHenry
Indeed, quantum physics has simply come to accept as a given over the years that there does not seem to be an independent reality. Physics has ceased questioning this, because experiments have confirmed it repeatedly and with a growing accuracy. Codswallop. If an electron is in two places, it doesn't mean that there's no independent reality. It means that the independent reality is that the electron is in both places. "No independent reality" would mean that the electron is over here for me and over there for you, but this doesn't happen, not in quantum theory, and not in experiment.
If there were no such thing as independent reality, there'd be no possibility of a science of physics.
To: PatrickHenry
electrons - "both/and" and "either/or" exist side-by-side.The Kerry Effect
35 posted on
10/12/2005 6:14:33 AM PDT by
kanawa
To: PatrickHenry
If evolution is a random series of events proceeding from the simple to the complex, exactly how do you explain the de-evolution of our species as personified by Matt Lauer and Katie Couric?
37 posted on
10/12/2005 6:22:29 AM PDT by
Doc Savage
(...because they stand on a wall, and they say nothing is going to hurt you tonight, not on my watch!)
To: PatrickHenry
I am beginning to believe that wave and particle are artificial constructs we have created as a result of living and observing in the macro world for so long. In reality (what ever it may be) everything is composed of wave like particles or particle like waves. Maybe a new word is needed.
38 posted on
10/12/2005 6:29:09 AM PDT by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson