Posted on 10/14/2005 10:46:27 AM PDT by YoshiBear
snip: "Rove, the most powerful and controversial political strategist in Washington, made no comment as he entered the federal courthouse to begin his testimony, hoping to convince grand jurors that he did nothing illegal. He had no comment when he left at 1:15 p.m. (1715 GMT)."
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
ROVE!: The movie.
Most controversial? WHY? because he kicks Democrats butts regularly?
Only democrats think he's controversial - the rest of us love him
He is hiding something of course, why wouldn't he let the reporters testify? "oh, he released the reporters months, ago and cooperate fully with the questions, and the investigator hasn't named him as a person of interest, well he still must be hiding something!!!
Gawd, what's next?
Rove Makes Stop In Men's Room After Grand Jury Testimony Concludes
AP sources revealed today that Karl Rove stopped in the courthouse men's room upon the conclusion of his testimony.
Once source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that Rove used a stall instead of a urinal, so experts are divided as to whether Rove had to urinate or defecate. But most experts agreed that Rove's sudden stop in the mens room signalled that he was worried about a possible indictment after his fourth trip to the grand jury.
my dream come true - Wilson and his wife (no longer posing as Cary Grant and Audrey Hepburn in their car) now wearing handcuffs
" hoping to convince grand jurors that he did nothing illegal"
Like Reuters has any idea what went on.
The media bias is dripping in it's transparency.
Clearly looking on the bright side. Alas neither was Tom Delay but he has a hearing next week.
he also used the visit to the men's room to stuff incriminating documents down his pants etc.
But...did he write a not to Condi, asking for permission to use the Men's Room?
Just a plain dumb statement.
The White House is beyond cooperative with this nonsensical Dr. Seuss investigation and yet they get zilch in credit from the media whores covering this. They have political reporters covering legal issues and they have absolutely no background whatsoever with grand juries to understand that the repeated voluntary appearance is the typical indication of a cooperating witness or a very, very innocent person.
Just too much.
lmao... I bet he's having a roll with them
not disagreeing - no one but us seem to remember he went there voluntarily and requested the meeting himself following Cooper's testimony
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.