Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Finally, a Smart Iraq Strategy
Newsweek ^ | October 16 2005 | Fareed Zakaria

Posted on 10/16/2005 11:36:16 AM PDT by jmc1969

I have a novel idea for the Bush administration. Let's give a medal to someone who's actually done a good job. My candidate would be Zalmay Khalilzad, the U.S. ambassador to Iraq, who has been doing yeoman service there. Last week he snatched a small victory from the jaws of defeat by getting the largest organized Sunni group, the Iraqi Islamic Party, to agree with the Shia and Kurds on amendments to the new Iraqi constitution. The effect of these amendments was to lessen the import of Saturday's vote for the constitution. The constitution can now be amended at will by the next Iraqi Parliament, which will be elected on Dec. 15. In other words, if the constitution fails, it will be rewritten, and if it succeeds, it can be rewritten.

While the cameras and media attention focused on Saturday's polls, Iraq's political parties—Sunni, Shia and Kurd—have begun organizing for the main event, the December election. Former prime minister Ayad Allawi, a smart, tough politician, already speaks mostly of that election in his public statements. October's poll ratifies words; December's poll distributes power.

The constitution as written already throws many crucial issues forward to the next Parliament. For example, it says that the oil revenues of the country are to be shared between the provinces and the central government. But it leaves the details of the revenue-sharing to be decided after Dec. 15. Ambiguities like that one—and there are dozens of them—mean that all groups have to be well represented in the next Parliament. This is especially true for the Sunnis. And even those Sunnis opposed to the constitution are organizing to gain seats in December.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq; iraqiconstitution; iraqielection; iraqsuccess

1 posted on 10/16/2005 11:36:17 AM PDT by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

*YAWN*


2 posted on 10/16/2005 11:37:54 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (Base. All Yours = Mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

NewsWEAK say it all.


3 posted on 10/16/2005 11:40:16 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

We certainly shouldn't give any credit to a president who has reversed a century of foreign policy and taken several years of heat over this.


4 posted on 10/16/2005 11:41:41 AM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
While Newsweek may have intended this as a negative, it actually IS a smart strategy. You can't have everything, but you still take one important step forward.

It gets the Iraqis used to voting and working out their differences peacefully, instead of by "insurgent attacks".

========

This is part of my sig line until the CA Special Elections on Nov. 8, 2005:
McClintock's recommendations for CA Propositions
Summary of Recommendations on the CA Propositions by various organizations and parties

5 posted on 10/16/2005 12:03:58 PM PDT by FairOpinion (CA Props: Vote for Reform: YES on 73-78, NO on 79 & 80, NO on Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

i was thinking that too. anyone heard of the "articles of confederation"?


6 posted on 10/16/2005 12:25:41 PM PDT by kpp_kpp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
The constitution as written already throws many crucial issues forward to the next Parliament. For example, it says that the oil revenues of the country are to be shared between the provinces and the central government. But it leaves the details of the revenue-sharing to be decided after Dec. 15
Would you really want oil revenue accounting formulas to be in your constitution? What is Newsweak saying here? Can you imagine a constitution that Newsweak would like? Whatever is written, Newsweak will find fault with it, and later trace that fault back to ... Bush, and ... Haliburton.
7 posted on 10/16/2005 12:54:36 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

Another milestone accomplished in Iraq in spite of the pissing and moaning and rooting for the enemy of the MSM and their Dim puppet masters. Therefore it's time to move the goalposts yet again.


8 posted on 10/16/2005 12:58:30 PM PDT by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
"Imagine a constitution that Newsweak would like?"

Ditto. All the lib naysayers like Newsweak and Tom Friedman are quick to call everything done by the Bush admin in Iraq incompetent as if they could have done better. I'll bet they would have no idea what to do. Apparently they believe that eradicating centuries of ignorance and despotism and installing democracy in a region that had never seen it before is an easy thing.

It would be great to put these clowns in charge and see how well they would do. Let's see. The Bush admin has ousted two Islamo-fascist governments and installed democracy in both of them in less than five years. It has also facilitated the advancement of democracy in Lebanon and Egypt. Libya has given up its wmds and Syria may fall to democratic forces soon. Not a bad record for the Bush team I'd say.

9 posted on 10/16/2005 1:15:47 PM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: driftless

Did you ever hear such braying when Clinton went into Haiti and Kosovo and made messes of them? Bush is winning and you will only know it when the democrats screw it up in their turn.


10 posted on 10/16/2005 2:39:05 PM PDT by Thebaddog (Are you a dog, too?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

I'm not sure...but I bet they LOVED the stupid one the EU bureaucrats came up with. And were stunned when the people voted it down.


11 posted on 10/16/2005 2:41:37 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: driftless
The Bush admin has ousted two Islamo-fascist governments and installed democracy in both of them in less than five years. It has also facilitated the advancement of democracy in Lebanon and Egypt. Libya has given up its wmds and Syria may fall to democratic forces soon. Not a bad record for the Bush team I'd say.
Not to mention real possibility of movement towards peace for Israel. Nobody mentions it --- because the subject is taboo with the UN crowd --- but Saddam was up to his elbows in inciting violence among the Palestinians. If Saddam were still around, I doubt Israel would have been emboldened to withdraw from Gaza.
12 posted on 10/16/2005 3:18:19 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: driftless

Fareed Zakaria, who I know casually, is no man's liberal.


13 posted on 10/16/2005 3:25:06 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
Here's an idea "Flush the Koran" Newsweek, actually REPORT the news. How come Sandrat posts dozens of real new stories here at Free Republic on Iraq daily yet you cannot even get ONE thing right. OH, I take that back, YOU do know WHERE Iraq IS, beyond that, NADA.
14 posted on 10/16/2005 4:23:30 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (I'll try to be NICER, if you will try to be SMARTER!.......Water Buckets UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
Did you ever hear such braying when Clinton went into Haiti and Kosovo and made messes of them?

And they still are messes. Remember the home by Christmas next year promise? Democrats can not have quagmires, I guess.

15 posted on 10/16/2005 5:25:49 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
"Would you really want oil revenue accounting formulas to be in your constitution?"


Actually, yes.

Oil revenue sharing is one of the things that shouldn't be left to ordinary laws, which are easily changed.

In Iraq, the issue is crucial. There is little oil in Sunni areas. The choices are between shutting out the Sunnis, or some sort of revenue sharing. The revenue sharing is a huge incentive for the Sunnis to compromise to avoid a civil war -- a war which would leave them with no oil revenue.

In Canada, the provinces own their natural resources -- while the federal government controls everything in or under the oceans. This is all spelled out in the Constitution Act of 1867 If the ownership weren't spelled out in the Constitution, there would be a major brouhaha about it. A regular donnybrook.
16 posted on 10/17/2005 12:30:15 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

The fact is that whatever mistakes made by the Bush admin, Hussein is ousted (the biggest and most important achievement) and soon to be dead (I hope), and Iraq is making excellent progress towards a democratic state. While I don't dismiss small details, I look at the whole picture. And the picture of the Mideast is looking much better than it did five years previous.


17 posted on 10/17/2005 2:16:15 PM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson