[faireturn]

" -- Gun owners will be allowed to keep their firearms in their vehicle, even if the car is parked on private property where the owner has a no-gun policy. -- "

---

Incredibly enough, there are lots of conservatives on FR who insist that private property 'rights' are being violated by such laws.

[BlackbirdSST]

Incredibly enough, there are lots of conservatives on FR who insist that private property 'rights' are being violated by such laws.

Limited to those that read from the Corporate Bill of Right's in the Constitution, which I can't seem to find in my copy. Why is that? Rhetorical. Blackbird.

[Panic in the Streets]

I am pro 2A, but if someone doesn't want you bringing a gun onto their property, it should be their right.

Just as it should be their right to disallow someone who is wearing color they don't like.

[Stopislamnow]

Private property?

Kelo nixed that.

[GladesGuru]

"Incredibly enough, there are lots of conservatives on FR who insist that private property 'rights' are being violated by such laws."

Wrong! !

The keeping of a gun inside one's vehicle is a right and as such can not be abridged. Why was this so written? So that some who just stops off enroute to other destinations does not lose his right to keep & bear arms.

However, to enter another's property with a gun can only be don't with the land owner's permission.

That which locked in a visitor's car is considered not to have entered private property in the same sense that a gun on a visitor's person would be.