Replies

Ohhh a word I have not seen in at least 10 years! froward: Meaning: turning back to one's own ways; difficult to deal with: stubbornly disobedient or contrary; going in one's own willful ways. Very well applied to yourself. Kudos for the attack of honesty.

Back to your original quote:
When the President starts following the Constitution, he will represent us. Not before. And if you are going to pretend to be an authority on the Constitution, and lecture others on it, you should at least read it.

Ooo!AND a BRILLIANT quoting of Article 6 to boot.

Yes, I was born in the United States. Make not ASS U MPTIONS that you can not come close to proving just to be insulting. That is a sign of a weak mind as well.

You STILL have not made your argument. Exactly where is the President not holding up the Constitution? Exactly how is it that you can exclude the entire Congress from your analysis, do you "Just Blame Bush" as a knee jerk response? Only thing I can come up with is not defending the Borders of this Nation, but that is a real big HARD thing to prove, seeing as he is following not only the Presidents that came before him and followed the same policies, but Congress has a hand in that as well. Be all that as it may, it is still not any sort of walking talking proof of his failure to up hold the Constitution. By no means do I excuse him for not closing the Borders. I am quite livid about it actually.

NEXT! Say, while you are furiously digging up arguments, why don't we ASSUME that we are speaking about both your original post and the story that it was related to instead of tilting at windmills? Lets stick to the topic dear.

>>>Ooo!AND a BRILLIANT quoting of Article 6 to boot.<<<

I know our education system has been dumbed down considerably since I attended school; but even now I not would consider a copy-paste of a clause of the Constitution to be an act of brilliance.

>>>You STILL have not made your argument. Exactly where is the President not holding up the Constitution?<<<

Seriously, sonny, you really do need a crash course in the Constitution. Afterward, you will be more likely to present a much easier question, such as, "When has the President upheld the Constitution?"

>>>Exactly how is it that you can exclude the entire Congress from your analysis...<<<

I haven't. Until now the debate has been about the President.

>>>. . . do you "Just Blame Bush" as a knee jerk response?<<

No, I blame him when he usurps the Constitution. In case you are wondering, I voted for him twice, and I have five years of posts on Free Republic you are welcome to read.

>>>Presidents that came before him and followed the same policies<<<

And they, as well, were guilty of usurpation of power, which is tyranny.

>>>Be all that as it may, it is still not any sort of walking talking proof of his failure to up hold the Constitution.<<<

Oh, yes it is. President Bush rarely considers the Constitution in his decisions, if at all.

>>>while you are furiously digging up arguments<<<

Furiously digging up what arguments?

>>>why don't we ASSUME that we are speaking about both your original post and the story that it was related to instead of tilting at windmills<<<

No, I will ASSUME that we are speaking about your original post, and my original post.