[DMinus]

so wait a minute.... another article said this was bad news for hitlery... which way is it?

[pickrell]

"..so wait a minute.... another article said this was bad news for hitlery... which way is it?.."

Either this is:

A misprint in the title,

An extremely thin attempt at satire,

Or, the most poorly constructed attempt at spin that I have ever read. You are quite correct, DMinus. This is NOT good news for the Clintons.

[pickrell]

"..so wait a minute.... another article said this was bad news for hitlery... which way is it?.."

Either this is:

A misprint in the title,

An extremely thin attempt at satire,

Or, the most poorly constructed attempt at spin that I have ever read. You are quite correct, DMinus. This is NOT good news for the Clintons.

[Txsleuth]

My question is the same as yours...

doug---your thread said it was BAD for Hillary

but, this one says it is GOOD for Hillary....

Please, can you clear this up?

[doug from upland]

Chavez failed to tell you that David Kendall accepted service for Hillary Clinton on July 11, 2001. He failed to tell you that Paul provided cancelled checks, invoices, and bank statments documenting $1.6 million in expenses. Chavez failed to tell you that, even after receiving the documentation and a hand delivered demand letter, Hillary still allowed her treasurer to file a third fraudulent FEC filing on July 30, 2001. Those would have been interesting details.

Chavez also failed to tell you that the Appellate Court refused to remove Hillary as a defendant. They are leaving that to the Superior Court to take on again.