[Pikamax]

damn it drudge, its been developed.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1506381/posts

[frankjr]

Thanks for the link. I was afraid I would need to stay up all night. Now in regards to that link...

If Fitzgerald is thinking "Among the charges that Mr. Fitzgerald is considering are perjury, obstruction of justice and false statement - " then that is B.S. No underlying crime...but he made some up during the proceedings. Come on Fitz! If those weak charges are made, I hope Bush pardons then promotes any indicted.

[Howlin]

Mr. Rove and Mr. Libby have been advised that they may be in serious legal jeopardy

By whom?

None of the lawyers would speak on the record, citing the prosecutor's requests not to talk about the case.

Boy, they have a real devotion to the law, don't they?

BTW, NYT, it's the LAW that they can't speak. DUH.

[airborne]

NYTimes now reporting no indictments likely!(from NewsMax)

NYT: Indictments Unlikely in Plamegate

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1506607/posts

[Courdeleon02]

It seems to me that the evidence to support an indictment of anyone is very weak. The NYT columnist is exaggerating and its easy to see that it is so much wishful thinking on his part.It could also be that Russert is lying to protect his source which may in fact be Joseph Wilson himself. Why do we assume that Russert is telling the truth and Libby is not. There is nothing here to indict anyone. It is all he said she said with no proof one way or the other as to who is telling the truth.

[Courdeleon02]

It seems to me that the evidence to support an indictment of anyone is very weak. The NYT columnist is exaggerating and its easy to see that it is so much wishful thinking on his part.It could also be that Russert is lying to protect his source which may in fact be Joseph Wilson himself. Why do we assume that Russert is telling the truth and Libby is not. There is nothing here to indict anyone. It is all he said she said with no proof one way or the other as to who is telling the truth.