Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Four-Step Program; How Bush can get his mojo back [pull Miers, nominate Edith Jones]
Wall Street Journal ^ | October 21, 2005 | BY DANIEL HENNINGER

Posted on 10/21/2005 3:10:01 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

Edited on 10/21/2005 5:06:00 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: Iconoclast2

> Cojones or no cojones, he still didn't have to pick Miers.

True true true. But W has never changed a decision, or admitted a mistake, exc Katrina, which he didn't have to. I bet the President will stay the course on Miers.


21 posted on 10/21/2005 3:35:48 PM PDT by cloud8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

In a perfect world, Edith Jones or Janice Rogers Brown would be on SCOTUS.
But this is Earth, and they would never be confirmed.


22 posted on 10/21/2005 3:35:48 PM PDT by Cincinna (HILLARY and her HINO want to take over your country. STOP THEM NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

I know Janice Rogers Brown seems to be a FR favorite, but wouldn't she be 58 by the time she served?

Can we go a little younger? That's all I'm asking.

Estrada, McConnell, Luttig.........?


23 posted on 10/21/2005 3:36:39 PM PDT by TitansAFC ("'C' is for 'cookie,' that's good enough for me" -- C. Monster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LS
I think Bush will get two more.

No. Even if Breyer or Ginsburg, et al. dies, the Dems will stuff and mount them a la Weekend at Bernie's to prevent this President from getting another pick. This is Bush's only other shot to remake the court. He has missed it.

24 posted on 10/21/2005 3:40:52 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: yoe
To heck with Edith Jones, Janice Rogers Brown is a female John Roberts, a woman equal to all tasks on the SC - Brown would be the best choice.

Lets try this:

To heck with John Roberts, Edith Jones is every bit as smart and doesn't believe that substantive due process is the window to judicial activism.

25 posted on 10/21/2005 3:41:00 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Later


26 posted on 10/21/2005 3:44:47 PM PDT by upchuck (I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON! Rumsfeld: go kick butt and fix this!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Truly, the GWB legacy doesn't look too good at the moment. I'm sure the President and his advisers are familiar with the remedies given above as well as others, but I am curious why he has chosen this course.

Dubya's agenda looks ad hoc to me; not everything fits into one theme, as we have been hoping.

My biggest worry now is that commitment to the WOT will falter. Since the administration has not shown the will to fight on the domestic front, this does not augur well for maintaining determination on Bush's ambitious foreign policy. I am troubled by the administration's increasing censure of our longest time Middle East democratic ally, Israel. How does Israel fit into the vision of a democratic ME?

The hurricanes and the death of CJ William Rehnquist really loaded W's plate, and I prayed for him. I am having a hard time understanding his words and actions since then.


27 posted on 10/21/2005 3:45:05 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (What happened to CPT Michael 'Scott' Speicher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy
He nominated her becaue she is the "most qualified" of every judge and lawyer in this nation

Elitist to the bitter end. As if only judges and lawyers can be appointed to the SCOTUS.

In any case, in the President's opinion, she is the most qualified candidate that can get the approved from our Left leaning Senate. Republican does not equal conservative.

28 posted on 10/21/2005 3:45:28 PM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Nail the Greenspan succession. Next to the Supreme Court, this is the last major appointment of Mr. Bush's presidency.

Oh dear god.
A month ago I was really looking forward to what sort of inspired choice Bush could make to replace Greenspan. The mind reeled with excitement.

Now I dread it.
Who will Bush choose?
His personal financial advisor who did "good work" advising him on some Texas oil fields?
29 posted on 10/21/2005 3:45:59 PM PDT by counterpunch (Save the GOP - withdraw Miers now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinna

In a perfect world, Edith Jones or Janice Rogers Brown would be on SCOTUS.
But this is Earth, and they would never be confirmed.
**

Ever heard "If you think you can't, you're probably right." or "Try, try again."

"One of the true tests of leadership is the ability to recognize a problem before it becomes an emergency." Arnold Glasow


30 posted on 10/21/2005 3:46:55 PM PDT by jdhljc169
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: W04Man
BS! STAY THE COURSE! YOU ARE RIGHT MR. PRESIDENT.

Is that you, Andy Card?
31 posted on 10/21/2005 3:47:01 PM PDT by counterpunch (Save the GOP - withdraw Miers now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I do have to ask. Is there a pun in there somewhere (Mike Myers vs. Harriet Miers)?

It would add some spies to the story if there were:).


32 posted on 10/21/2005 3:47:46 PM PDT by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Estrada, McConnell, Luttig.........?

Not a chance for Estrada after the Miers flap over qualifications.
Plus Estrada didn't even have the stomach for the fight for an Appellate Court seat.
33 posted on 10/21/2005 3:48:51 PM PDT by counterpunch (Save the GOP - withdraw Miers now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy

The "most qualified person in America" comment really stung me when he said it.

All the Liberals who tell me "Bush is a liar," well, I can't tell them to just "name one actual lie" anymore.

Rush Limbaugh had said that Bush "does not lie." I bet he's feeling the same as me right now.

I think the biggest tragedy of this whole nomination is just how much Bush is willing to sacrifice to reward his personal friend. He has tainted his honesty with that "most qualified" comment, and many people now question his honesty over the "Thomas and Scalia" thing. He has put loyal Senators who have been unwavering in their support of him, many of whom will be hurt either by voting for or against Miers, in an impossible position. He has insulted his supporters who are critical of the nomination, putting many GOP votes at risk in a very divided nation.

I mean, he is sacrificing a lot at the altar of Harriet Miers, whether you agree with the pick or not.


34 posted on 10/21/2005 3:48:54 PM PDT by TitansAFC ("'C' is for 'cookie,' that's good enough for me" -- C. Monster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

---"Not a chance for Estrada after the Miers flap over qualifications.
Plus Estrada didn't even have the stomach for the fight for an Appellate Court seat."---

Estrada would easily meet qualifications.

The reason he didn't have the stomach was because his wife was dying. She passed away soon after he withdrew. He was quite interested, but he is also an honorable, family man.



35 posted on 10/21/2005 3:51:04 PM PDT by TitansAFC ("'C' is for 'cookie,' that's good enough for me" -- C. Monster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

The interesting aspect of this article is that it makes the fundamental misassumption that all of the polls are true.

Our president does not , wohoooo!,configure his administrative policy around polls, like Bill Clinton did.
On all major policy matters he has chosen his path carefully and stayed on it with a degree of tenacity which indicates that his MOJO is just fine.

He will stick with Miers too. I do not agree with all of our presidents actions ,( he should have tapped Scalia as Chief Justice and brought Roberts on as an associate judge, he should start calling the "terrorists" what they really are, Islamofascists, and he should secure our borders), but I do not think his MOJO is suffering at all.

He just doesn't want to waste his time and energy with
political infighting, wants to secure the Hispanic vote, and wants to let the sleeping dog of American Islam lie.

However, it IS high noon at the OK coral. He better practise his quick draw.


36 posted on 10/21/2005 3:51:30 PM PDT by Candor7 (Into Liberal Flatulence Goes the Hope of the West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
he didn't nominate Miers to then pull her.

No, he nominated her so the Judiciary Committee could then trash her and the full Senate could then dump her. What a pal.

37 posted on 10/21/2005 3:52:01 PM PDT by Map Kernow ("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jdhljc169

---""One of the true tests of leadership is the ability to recognize a problem before it becomes an emergency." Arnold Glasow"---

Are you saying Bush is a bad leader because he didn't recognize the impending emergency with his base on the Miers nomination?


38 posted on 10/21/2005 3:52:18 PM PDT by TitansAFC ("'C' is for 'cookie,' that's good enough for me" -- C. Monster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: W04Man

I think that it's almost impossible for the president to widthdraw Meirs at this time. Here's my theory:

I believe that a deal was made with the dems for the confirmation of Roberts without any hitch.
Recall that when Renquist died, that the plan was suddenly switched to have Roberts replace Renquist instead of O'connor?
Then Pres. Bush submitted a list of potential nominees to Reid?
He told the president that he would approve of Meirs, probably in exchange of Roberts sailing through the senate hearings and conformation. Knowing the weak-knee pubbies and the gang of 14 would filibuster any nominee in the Scalia or Thomas mold,(they have said as much) the president decided that he would go ahead with the deal. He didn't imagine the firestorm that would follow from some conservatives, so he didn't let them in on the deal. But I believe that some of them, including el Rushbo himself have figure this out but can not really address it. Just listen to Rush and you can tell that he has some inside info. I believe that the only way out for Pres. Bush is for Meirs to widthdraw, but it has to be a convincing withdrawl in order for the dems not think that they have not been double-cross.


39 posted on 10/21/2005 3:54:47 PM PDT by el negro zorro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jdhljc169

Remember, this is EARTH.
Politics is the art of the possible.


40 posted on 10/21/2005 3:55:11 PM PDT by Cincinna (HILLARY and her HINO want to take over your country. STOP THEM NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson