You missed the point, and she's not the webmaster.
Ah, well, I guess it doesn't matter :-)
Trust Bush. I'm sure it will work out just fine for you :-)
If you read any of my posts prior to our discussion, you will find that I am NOT one to to simply trust and that I actively encourage debate. I'm not participating in the Miers debate myself, but have inserted myself where I see dishonesty.
I couldn't tell if your selective analysis of Campaign Solutions / Donatelli was intentional obfuscation or not, which is why I asked the original questions.
Anybody can look up whois or political contribution databases. However, I think you have really taken some huge leaps to arrive at your conclusions.
I haven't looked closely at Donatelli, but I did see that a SVP worked on JC Watt's campaign. That was enough for me to conclude that you have engaged in excessive hyperbole.
And yes, I realize that whats-her-name is not the webmaster. Turn up your humor radar a notch. She is the Administrative Contact. That does not mean she "paid for" the domain as you stated. One of her underlings likely registered the domain when they were hired by the Committee for Justice. I'm sure the CFJ will be billed for it, but recognizing this and presenting it in this more fair fashion doesn't suit your scare campaign, does it?
You need to look at the CMJ, not a single priciple at Campaign Solutions.
I'm now questioning whether you are foolishly reading too much into your armchair detective work, or if you are merely employing dishonest tactics to further your own agenda.
Having said all that, rest assured that I am not overly pleased with the nomination. I think Bush could have done much better. I'm still asking myself "what was he thinking?" This is why I'm reading, but not presuming to know enough to opine on then nomination itself.