Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/24/2005 6:43:28 AM PDT by Cagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Cagey
....if I was as negligent as the US Congress, I would've been told to take a pay cut!!

Doogle
2 posted on 10/24/2005 6:47:53 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF...7thAF ..4077th TFW...408th MMS..Ubon Thailand.."69",,Night Line Delivery..AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cagey

I suspect that they won't be able to reach an agreement and will get a raise anyway.


5 posted on 10/24/2005 6:56:06 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cagey
Real smart. They complain its too costly to maintain two residences. Well isn't a public career a sacrifice? They think they should be rewarded with an awful lot of money for not doing nearly enough... they do get a lot of breaks. How hard can it be to sit on committee hearings, write bills and vote? They think the American people are ingrates for not approving of their desire for more pay.

("Denny Crane: Gun Control? For Communists. She's a liberal. Can't hunt.")

6 posted on 10/24/2005 6:57:49 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cagey

"Most members of Congress probably have more debt after they've been in Congress for a few years then they had when they came to Congress," Blunt said, adding that keeping residences in two places is costly.

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., also backs the raise.

SPARE ME!!! These guys won't be happy till we are all begging in the streets!


7 posted on 10/24/2005 7:00:13 AM PDT by SMARTY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cagey

""Most of our members are not individuals of great resources, they're families trying to send kids to college," said House Republican Leader Roy Blunt, R-Mo., defending his support for a pay raise."

At $160,000, this moron makes a hell lot more than me. He needs a pay cut. If he's that worried about his salary, then he can find a job in the private sector. Some Republican.


8 posted on 10/24/2005 7:01:19 AM PDT by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cagey

Good. I think these guys deserve it. hell, give them double what they make now, or triple it even. what sacrafice, what fortitude, the best of the best and even when the.........BWAHAHAHAHAHA...sorry, couldnt keep a straight face :)


9 posted on 10/24/2005 7:03:07 AM PDT by KOZ.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cagey

Hillary is worth $13 million?

Looks like investing in cattle and kissing terrorists pays good bucks. Or is it the other way around?


14 posted on 10/24/2005 7:05:14 AM PDT by sergeantdave (Member of Arbor Day Foundation, travelling the country and destroying open space)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cagey

Most crows would blush under these circumstances but our congress-critters mull over when, rather than whether, they can `jack' their paychecks.
Nice work if you can get it: great benefits, but short for 'walkin' around' money? Well heck, just vote yourself a raise!
27th Amendment, US Constitution


While Hamilton (Fed. # 67) had their number way back when:
http://www.law.ou.edu/hist/federalist


15 posted on 10/24/2005 7:05:24 AM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cagey
"Most of our members are not individuals of great resources, they're families trying to send kids to college,"

Well, shucky-darns, most of the constituents are the same. Why don't you ask us if we can afford to give you guys a pay raise?

17 posted on 10/24/2005 7:08:25 AM PDT by Redleg Duke (9/11 - "WE WILL NEVER FORGET!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cagey

I sure would love to have these salary options available for voting by US since we pay them.


22 posted on 10/24/2005 7:18:44 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cagey

This is why Congresscritters and Senator should employeess of their state governments and have salaries and expenses paid by the same. Then they would not have a say in this matter (except to quit if they didn't like their pay!). As it is, they represent themselves to the Federal Government, not the States and the People.


23 posted on 10/24/2005 7:21:36 AM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cagey

After spending our tax dollars at a greater clip than during the Lyndon Johnson administration, the only thing I see these guys deserving is a tar-and-feathering.


27 posted on 10/24/2005 7:24:33 AM PDT by reelfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cagey

I have never been able to figure out how these annual pay raises do not violate the 27th Ammendment to the Constitution.


30 posted on 10/24/2005 7:44:07 AM PDT by ops33 (Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cagey

I hope my congresscritter, Melissa Hart, votes herself a nice big fat pay raise.


31 posted on 10/24/2005 8:24:23 AM PDT by MurryMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cagey
the overwhelming Senate support for the pay freeze "is another indicator that we are getting serious about controlling federal spending."

My seriousness about dieting and weight loss is shown by ordering the large fries once a month instead of the super size ones I usually have.

If these cuts of $3,100 per year per Congressman is kept up for 132 years it would pay for Alaska's Bridge to Nowhere.

32 posted on 10/24/2005 8:28:16 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (We were promised someone in the Scalia/Thomas mold. Maybe next time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cagey
The pay raise, which automatically kicks in unless it is blocked...

What a great scheme/scam!

33 posted on 10/24/2005 9:02:03 AM PDT by Triggerhippie (Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cagey
Okay 1.9 percent is not that big a raise. I get a 3 to 5 percent myself but it is the principle of the thing.

I have not exactly been overwhelmed with their performance this year..or last year..or the year before that..

No raise for you!

35 posted on 10/24/2005 9:06:32 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Warning: Not a Romantic or hero worshiper. Attempts to tug at my heartstrings annoy me... and I bite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cagey

They should be made to cut pork barrel spending in order to finance their pay rise.

Regards, Ivan


36 posted on 10/24/2005 9:08:58 AM PDT by MadIvan (You underestimate the power of the Dark Side - http://www.sithorder.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cagey
Tie Congression pay to the Federal Deficit. The bigger tha deficit, the smaller their pay!
37 posted on 10/24/2005 9:10:01 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cagey
You can't use tact with a Congressman! A Congressman is a hog! You must take a stick and hit him on the snout!

Henry B. Adams

39 posted on 10/24/2005 9:25:22 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson