Skip to comments.
How staged sex crime fooled Supreme Court
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| October 24, 2005
| Joseph Farah
Posted on 10/24/2005 12:27:04 PM PDT by Hunterb
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-287 next last
To: rdb3
That begs the question: Doesn't the very definition of "homosexual" (and the fight for "homosexual rights") put everyone into their bedrooms?
So you think government is going to force you to have a homosexual in your bedroom.
Whatever you are taking, lay off of it.
To: Paul C. Jesup
You do use, of course, USDA approved condoms, right?
Or, do you prefer those cheap propylene things down at Harbor Freight?
When you advocate getting the government out of the bedroom, there are no half-measures. In for a dime, in for a dollar.
22
posted on
10/24/2005 12:50:14 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
(/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again? How'bout a double sarcasm for this one)
To: Cboldt
Griswold was a setup too. Yup. And yet Farah says: ....is that the Supreme Court, possibly for the first time in history, ruled on a case "with virtually no factual underpinnings."
It never ceases to amaze me when professional writers make unnecessary and inexcusable mistakes like that one. Sure, I can understand everyone not knowing about Griswold. But I can't understand someone tossing out "possibly for the first time in history" unless he's comfortable enough in the subject matter to have some confidence in what he's saying. Farah obviously wasn't, yet made the assertion anyway. It just makes people who know better lose faith in the accuracy of what he says.
23
posted on
10/24/2005 12:50:43 PM PDT
by
XJarhead
To: Hunterb
24
posted on
10/24/2005 12:50:59 PM PDT
by
wsack
To: Paul C. Jesup
Prostitution remains against the law - at least where I live.
25
posted on
10/24/2005 12:51:47 PM PDT
by
mlc9852
To: muawiyah
You do use, of course, USDA approved condoms, right?
I take it you a foolish enough to trust a woman when she says she is taking birth control pills.
To: muawiyah
You do use, of course, USDA approved condoms, right?
I take it you are foolish enough to trust a woman when she says she is taking birth control pills.
To: Paul C. Jesup
Then why is sex and marraige outlawed between family members, like a brother and sister? Even if they are consenting?
28
posted on
10/24/2005 12:52:34 PM PDT
by
KC_Conspirator
(This space outsourced to India)
To: Paul C. Jesup
"So you would prefer to have government in your bedroom?"
Your reflexive response is completely inoperable. The whole point here is, the cops were MANIPULATED into going into someone's bedroom through a ruse whereby they believed a criminal act that could take a life was about to happen. They could have been manipulated into...the basement...the attic...the linen closet. You miss the point. They didn't want to go into anyone's anything... someone set the cops up.
To: mlc9852
Prostitution remains against the law - at least where I live.
Not in the state of Navada.
To: Hunterb
"How staged sex crime fooled Supreme Court "
I don't get it. It was well known that the crime was staged for purpose of getting the SCOTUS to review the constitutionality of the anti-sodomy law. What's more the facts of the case were largely irrelevant, as the SCOTUS was only ruling on the constitutionality of the underlying law.
31
posted on
10/24/2005 12:53:04 PM PDT
by
Moral Hazard
("Now therefore kill every male among the little ones" - Numbers 31:17)
To: pgyanke
This charge should have been handled the same as if these degenerates had invited school children into this scene. Baloney.
32
posted on
10/24/2005 12:53:36 PM PDT
by
vikzilla
To: Paul C. Jesup
So you think government is going to force you to have a homosexual in your bedroom.
Whatever you are taking, lay off of itAll right. I asked my question respectfully, which you sidestepped. So I'll ask it one more time: Doesn't the very definition of "homosexual" (and the fight for "homosexual rights") put everyone into their bedrooms?
If you want a Google GMail account, FReepmail me.
33
posted on
10/24/2005 12:54:04 PM PDT
by
rdb3
(Have you ever stopped to think, but forgot to start again?)
To: Coleus
And yet women have a reputation for faking it.
34
posted on
10/24/2005 12:54:38 PM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Hunterb
Who was the idiot prosecutor who decided to go ahead with this case?
35
posted on
10/24/2005 12:54:48 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
(If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
To: Hunterb
This has been common knowledge for quite some time.
36
posted on
10/24/2005 12:54:48 PM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: vikzilla
You gonna argue your point or tell us about lunch meat?
37
posted on
10/24/2005 12:54:48 PM PDT
by
pgyanke
(A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have.)
To: Paul C. Jesup
Obviously I don't live in Nevada or I wouldn't have made that statement.
38
posted on
10/24/2005 12:55:10 PM PDT
by
mlc9852
To: Hunterb
When a court departs from the law and becomes a promoter of social agendas, it invites manipulation.
39
posted on
10/24/2005 12:55:40 PM PDT
by
Spok
(Est omnis de civilitate.)
To: Paul C. Jesup
So you would prefer to have government in your bedroom? Of course they do. Haven't you been paying attention?
40
posted on
10/24/2005 12:55:56 PM PDT
by
Wolfie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-287 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson