[pgkdan]

Was the U.S. Supreme Court fooled by a make-believe sodomy case in Lawrence v. Texas – one manufactured by homosexual activists to entrap police and ensnare the judicial system in a conspiracy to change the law of the land?

Why not? The USSC was fooled by a make believe rape and pregnancy in Roe v. Wade...seems they'll believe anything.

[TexasCajun]

Here in Texas, we get a chance to nip same-sex marriage in the butt next election.

[Michael.SF.]

[Paul C. Jesup]

So you would prefer to have government in your bedroom?

[Always Right]

This is pretty common for the left. Stage 'crimes' to advance an agenda. The left can't do anything honestly, they must manipulate.

[Cboldt]

Griswold was a setup too.

[mlc9852]

GROSS!!!!

[funkywbr]

Eveyone knows that ruling just sucked!

[Gator101]

In other words, this case captures the gay agenda in a nutshell. For the most part the world doesn't care what happens in bedrooms behind closed doors so they fabricated a reason for the authorities to HAVE to come into their bedroom and get an eyeful.

[muawiyah]

If "Lawrence v...." is acceptable to the USSC then my thought the other day that it is up to the Chief Justice to control the USSC docket in the mailroom is certainly workable.

[ThinkDifferent]

It's common to challenge a law by finding someone willing to deliberately get arrested for violating it. Regardless of your view of the Lawrence decision, this is a non-story.

[wsack]

Scopes was a setup too.

[Moral Hazard]

"How staged sex crime fooled Supreme Court "

I don't get it. It was well known that the crime was staged for purpose of getting the SCOTUS to review the constitutionality of the anti-sodomy law. What's more the facts of the case were largely irrelevant, as the SCOTUS was only ruling on the constitutionality of the underlying law.

[Calpernia]

And yet women have a reputation for faking it.

[sinkspur]

Who was the idiot prosecutor who decided to go ahead with this case?

[Wolfie]

This has been common knowledge for quite some time.

[Spok]

When a court departs from the law and becomes a promoter of social agendas, it invites manipulation.

[little jeremiah]

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

Just because it's WND doesn't mean it's wrong. Read the article - we who keep track of such things on FR knew this was a set up at the time it went before the SCOTUS; now here are more facts.

Rick Santorum was right. Just because you've heard the words "slippery slope" gazillions of times doesn't mean they're not true.

We're living in perilous times.

Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.

[Old Professer]

What was Roe vs Wade?

[Rodney King]

I don't get it. What's the story? Were the men having consexual sodomy? Yes. So they staged it, so what? The implication here is that the Supreme Court was somehow bamboozled. Bamboozled into what? One man was sodomizing another, and they were arrested for it. How does the contituionality of it matter whether or not the men planned to get caught?

Maybe I should go on a bank robbing spree, and call the cops myself while I am robbing the place. Then, if I get caught, I can say "hey, I staged the whole thing, therefore you can't arrest me for it!".

Think that will work?