Skip to comments.
Demonizing Condi (USA Today's shameful photoshop exploits)
Michelle Malkin ^
| October 26, 2005
| Michelle Malkin
Posted on 10/26/2005 4:43:26 AM PDT by ajolympian2004
DEMONIZING CONDI
By
Michelle Malkin
· October 26, 2005 06:41 AM
Check out the photo of Condoleezza Rice that was published by USA Today last week:
Notice anything peculiar about her eyes?
(Click on the Extended Entry for an explanation.)
No, Condi isn't possessed; the photo was manipulated.
This news comes courtesy of From The Pen, which found a pre-doctored version of the Associated Press photo on Yahoo! España:
Ask USA Today's Graphics and Photos Managing Editor, Richard Curtis (rcurtis@usatoday.com), what the ^$%#@+! is going on.
***
Related:
Katherine Harris vs. the Photo Doctors
Time's photo distortions
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: condi2008; condirice; foxnews; foxnewscontributor; hillary; lamestreammedia; leftistbias; leftistdeceit; leftistlies; liberalmedia; lyingliars; malkin; mediabias; medialies; michellemalkin; msm; msmbastards; rice2008; secretaryofstate; usatoday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-145 next last
To: FreeAtlanta
Daniel Jackson's wife is HOT!
61
posted on
10/26/2005 6:12:58 AM PDT
by
The_Victor
(If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
To: BufordP
The MSM will just ignore you..........better to hit them in the pocketbook...........stop buying their product, and if you need to complain, take the complaints to the advertisers, and threaten to hit their pocketbooks too..........that is all that will work.....don't complain to them, take direct action against them.......that is what I am trying to say.
62
posted on
10/26/2005 6:13:41 AM PDT
by
joe fonebone
(The light you see at the end of the tunnel is actually a train heading towards you!)
To: Jhensy
No. I do this stuff for a living; they deliberately went in and selectively boosted the whites of the eyes. It's so ham-handed and obvious it's laughable. As do I, and I concur.
63
posted on
10/26/2005 6:16:48 AM PDT
by
kimmie7
(As of October 23, I've been smoke free 8 MONTHS!)
To: BufordP
Excluding the WOT ?????
What is WOT? ;*)
64
posted on
10/26/2005 6:17:06 AM PDT
by
Just A Nobody
("The Constitution: It ain't long. It ain't complicated and only idiot lawyers can make it so." A D)
To: Red Badger
Leave Uma Alone! She's HOT!!!!!...........LOL. I know................. when she opens her eyes like she does (I'm Uma Pemmaraju) she's about as HOT as Michelle Malkin when she gets excited about any story. I love when that happens.
Michelle and Uma are so physically warm. And, btw, where is my little "private school girl", Heather Nauert, these days? Yoi, I miss her!
;-)
65
posted on
10/26/2005 6:27:32 AM PDT
by
beyond the sea
(Gloria Borger is Andrea Mitchell on Peyote)
To: ajolympian2004
The media is a danger to our Republic. Their bias and purposeful misleading of people rivels the corrupt media's in the former communist russia or hitlers germany
66
posted on
10/26/2005 6:32:11 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: beyond the sea
Those eyes of hers just draw you in like a cobra staring down its prey..............
67
posted on
10/26/2005 6:33:00 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(In life, you don't get what you deserve. You get what you settle for...........)
To: saveliberty; ajolympian2004
"So much for being an organization that respects individuals."
Liberal racism festers, of course, in their own Liberal - anti-individual and racist - Leftist eye; and they cannot hide it. . .
. . .it continually translates what they say and see. . .and they in turn are compelled by their Utilitarian, 'end justifies ANY means' philosophy to manipulate their vision (propaganda) for us. . .
The harsh realitiy is, this IS a murder of someone's image. . .and these 'photo-opportunists' should not be able to get away with it. . . . .
It is the Leftist-filled media that continues to need honest exposure.
68
posted on
10/26/2005 6:33:06 AM PDT
by
cricket
(No Freedom - No Peace)
To: ajolympian2004
Not just a contrast adjustment, look at the top of the top lip. It has been removed / straightened so as to appear to be more "pursed" or give Condi a meaner more threatening appearance.............
69
posted on
10/26/2005 6:35:41 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(In life, you don't get what you deserve. You get what you settle for...........)
To: Peach
I hope you'll cancel your subscription to USA Today and give them the reason why. Why feed the hand that bites you?
To: ajolympian2004
Not possible. Everyone knows that the American press is honest, unbiased, and if you listen to some idiot liberals of the DailyKos stripe, biased in favor of conservatives.
71
posted on
10/26/2005 6:40:25 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(The greatest gifts parents can give their children are siblings.)
To: Red Badger
Those eyes of hers just draw you in like a cobra staring down its prey..............LOL..... where is my ticket to the "drawing"?
:-)
72
posted on
10/26/2005 6:41:50 AM PDT
by
beyond the sea
(Gloria Borger is Andrea Mitchell on Peyote)
To: Justanobody
What is WOT? ;*) War On Terror. . .
73
posted on
10/26/2005 6:42:17 AM PDT
by
cricket
(No Freedom - No Peace)
To: ajolympian2004; All
Nah. Before and after 14 beers.
;-)
74
posted on
10/26/2005 6:42:57 AM PDT
by
beyond the sea
(Gloria Borger is Andrea Mitchell on Peyote)
To: joe fonebone
Understood, but I can't really affect their pocketbook. I haven't patronized the MSM for years other than reading what's posted here or on some conservative blog.
75
posted on
10/26/2005 6:43:44 AM PDT
by
BufordP
(Excluding the WOT, I haven't trusted W since he coined the term "compassionate conservative")
To: ajolympian2004
76
posted on
10/26/2005 6:43:48 AM PDT
by
Dustbunny
(Main Stream Media -- Making 'Max Headroom' a reality.)
To: Justanobody
War On Terror. Gotta give the drunken sailor credit for somethin'.
77
posted on
10/26/2005 6:45:32 AM PDT
by
BufordP
(Excluding the WOT, I haven't trusted W since he coined the term "compassionate conservative")
To: yoe
Ansel Adams was famous for his dramatic black and white photographs, some of which I dare say were manipulated in his dark room for greater effect. I'm sure you'll agree that it's one thing if you manipulate a photograph for artistic purposes, and quite another if you manipulate it for journalistic purposes.
To: bitt
Hope that was a good email address as I just sent them a 'nasty gram'.
79
posted on
10/26/2005 6:47:05 AM PDT
by
Dustbunny
(Main Stream Media -- Making 'Max Headroom' a reality.)
To: ajolympian2004
Man, that photo manipulation is clumsier than if I'd have imported the thing into Microsoft Paint and drawn in the eyes with the pencil tool.
80
posted on
10/26/2005 6:48:33 AM PDT
by
Puddleglum
(Thank God the Boston blowhard lost)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-145 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson