Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE DANGER OF RUNNING VICARIOUSLY:Bill O'Reilly chews up and spits out the hillary clinton candidacy
The O'Reilly Factor, Bill O'Reilly, Susan Estrich, Real Rape | 10.27.05 | Mia T

Posted on 10/27/2005 9:07:26 AM PDT by Mia T

THE DANGER OF RUNNING VICARIOUSLY:

Bill O'Reilly chews up and spits out the hillary clinton candidacy

by Mia T, 10.27.05

 

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)






the principal being more worthless even than its phantom proxy, both alike unsubstantial, and the former shapeless to boot

--Samuel Taylor Coleridge

 




or the most part, missus clinton operates in absentia, by proxy.

You rarely see her. You almost never hear her. (Think of it as the hillary! 2000 'listening tour' extended ad nauseam.)

And in those rare instances where she does actually speak, the 'event' is always prearranged, prescripted, prepeopled and preprogrammed by the clinton political machine.

If you stop and think about it, the American voter hasn't ever had the opportunity to see, hear, examine the actual merchandise...much less contemplate the return policy.

There are three principal reasons for this clinton scheme.

  1. To conceal the hillary dud factor. (See SCHEMA PINOCCHIO: how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor)

  2. To shield missus clinton from questions concerning clinton corruption, clinton abuse of women, clinton abuse of power, clinton utter failure to confront terrorism, etc.

  3. To allow missus clinton to pose as a moderate without overly enraging her radical leftist comrades (Cindy Sheehan excepted).

 

PROXY SQUARED

The clintons, as is their wont, are now taking this proxy scheme to even more outrageous extremes. The latest: an actual hillary clinton proxy presidency, populated on both sides of the camera by assorted rodham and clinton ex-staffers, sycophants and would-be felons, witness the latest hire.

'Commander-in-Chief,' a show that sets out to crown a 'queen,' instead exposes the kitschy simplemindedness of Hollywood fantasy and the special sway and shortsightedness of the pathologic ego.

 

REAL RAPE BY PROXY

And then we have the Susan Estrich proxy.

Susan Estrich is the Democrat political operative who put Dukakis in a tank and would put hillary in the White House. Amazon.com sales rank suggests another tank for Susan: Following her sales pitch on Hannity and Colmes the other night, her book, The Case for Hillary Clinton went from bad to worse, (It instantly sustained a 10% decline to #8517. As I type this, it is #12,244.)

Ms. Estrich also wrote Real Rape, a book about the clinton-clinton-Broaddrick kind of rape. But that was before she was tapped by the clinton machine to cover for... and revise the predatory history of... a couple of real rapists.

'Simple rape' is what the system calls this clinton kind of rape... Simple as opposed to aggravated. 'Simple rape,' a horrendous misnomer that only perpetuates the injustice. 'Real Rape' is what Ms. Estrich called it. But, as I said, that was before she was tapped by the clintons.

In the cases on which this book focuses, the man is not the armed stranger jumping from the bushes--nor yet the black man jumping the white woman, the case that was most likely to result in the death penalty prior to 1977, and the stereotype that may explain in part the seriousness with which a white male criminal justice system has addressed "stranger" rape. Instead the man is a neighbor, an acquaintance, or a date. The man and the woman are both white, or both black, or both Hispanic. He is a respected bachelor, a student, a businessman, or a professional. He may have been offered a ride home or invited in. He does not have a weapon. He acted alone. It is, in short, a simple rape.

Susan Estrich, Real Rape

In 'simple rape,' the system invariably revictimizes the victim and protects the rapist.

This horrible perversion of justice was the impetus for her book, so, of course, Ms Estrich knows exactly what is going on here between the clintons and Broaddrick. (To be expanded upon in future posts.)

Worse still, Ms. Estrich uses the horror of her own purported rape to obfuscate the casuistry and rapelies required to spin yet another rapist presidency. Estrich is contemptible.

This is the usual clinton rube arrogance rooted in stupidity (of which this interview tonight is but another example).

The clintons figured that Estrich in their corner would make clinton serial rape and predation just disappear, not understanding that her presence would only intensify the scrutiny and that her 'expertise' and prior utterances would be used against them... and her.

Indeed, by twisting her own scholarship, Estrich indicts the clintons just as surely as the twisting double helix on that blue Gap dress.

Estrich's reaction to Juanita Broaddrick is the typical opportunistic, dishonest feminist reaction. (See article, Salon.com.)

While most, if not all of the women who contributed to the salon.com piece believed Juanita, (liberals as well as conservatives), some feminists were in denial; they conveniently relied on false premises to assuage the cognitive dissonance.

One recurring false premise (a premise that Estrich relies on): although Juanita was credible, clinton couldn't be a rapist because he never raped before (or since).

Notwithstanding the fact that not all rapists are serial rapists, did they never hear of Eileen Wellstone et al?

Shame on them.

 

"Who is Juanita Broaddrick? I've never heard of her!" cried Betty Friedan, the founder of modern feminism. Friedan's outburst came at last Friday's conference, entitled "The Legacy and Future of Hillary Rodham Clinton." Held at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington. D.C., the event offered a chilling microcosm of an angry, divided America.

For nearly an hour, a five-woman panel had been debating whether Hillary qualified as a "feminist heroine." I thought Broaddrick's claim of having been raped by Hillary's husband had some bearing on this point, so I broached the subject during the question-and-answer period. Friedan's dyspeptic denial followed.

Was Friedan telling the truth? Maybe. And maybe all those millions of Germans who professed ignorance of the death camps were telling the truth too. The problem is, having admitted her ignorance, Friedan showed no interest in exploring the matter further. And that was the problem with the Germans too.

Totalitarian impulses flourished at the conference. Taking a page from Soviet psychiatry, some Clintonites suggested that Hillary hating might be a mental illness.

Richard Poe
The Hillary Conspiracy


HANNITY'S ESTRICH INTERVIEW: THE CLINTONS' RAPE OF BROADDRICK

While Sean Hannity correctly zeroed in on the clinton rape of Juanita Broaddrick, one of the issues that should automatically disqualify missus clinton for any position of power, he sabotaged his own line of attack.

Hannity's setup question, whether hillary 'believed' bill, was a dodge. And a not very artful one, at that. As Sean Hannity knows well, the issue isn't whether hillary 'believed' bill; the issue is whether hillary participated. In that rape as well as in all the other clinton rapes and predations.

Hannity of all people should know this. He interviewed Broaddrick on precisely that point. (A video and analysis of that interview to follow.) Broaddrick described to him in shocking detail the meeting with hillary clinton that occurred several weeks after the rape. missus clinton went to that meeting for the express purpose of warning Broaddrick to keep her mouth shut. (She and the rapist entered the room, she approached Broaddrick (whom she had never met before) while a slinking rapist stayed behind, she proceeded to warn Broaddrick, she and the rapist immediately left.)

In Hannity's original Estrich-Broaddrick interview, he was honest about the real issue. But even then he ultimately failed because he neglected to expose the following clinton casuistry being spun by Estrich:

  1. the 'statute of limitation' on rape should apply to the clintons in the Broaddrick rape,

  2. the postmodern construction of 'rape,' i.e., the definition of rape is subjective, i.e., what is considered rape by the victim isn't necessarily considered rape by the rapist,

  3. the definition of rape has morphed over time, i.e., what is rape today wasn't necessarily rape in the '70s.

 

On point 1, the statute of limitation on rape applies in a court of law, not in the voting booth. The question we are deciding isn't whether the clintons should be thrown in the slammer (another matter for another day); the question is less onerous, (from the clintons' perspective, anyway): Do the clintons have the character to be president?

The reductio ad absurdum is Christopher Shays' comment, made after he viewed the Ford building evidence on the rape of Broaddrick: "I believed that he had done it. I believed her that she had been raped 20 years ago. And it was vicious rapes, it was twice at the same event." Asked if the president is a rapist, Shays said, "I would like not to say it that way. But the bottom line is that I believe that he did rape Broaddrick."

And yet Shays voted not to impeach. Purportedly because he asked the wrong question. ("Where was the obstruction of justice?") (Any cognitive dissonance Shays may have experienced rendering that verdict was no doubt assuaged by the political plum clinton gave to Mrs. (Betsi) Shays...)

And so we had two more years of the clinton Nano-Presidency. And with it, inexorably, 9/11.

Regarding points two and three: Juanita's bitten lip, swollen to twice its normal size, the hallmark of a serial rapist, is the obvious counterexample.

This book should be required reading... for Susan Estrich.

 

ADDENDUM:

Ignoring the facts of the case, ignoring the 'real rape' paradigm, indeed, ignoring her own writings on 'real rape,' Susan Estrich, on Hannity and Colmes, pimping for yet another rapist presidency, dismissed out of hand Juanita Broaddrick's credible charge, that she was raped by the clintons.

In response, Juanita Broaddrick has offered to meet with Susan Estrich to discuss the matter. Estrich turned her down flat. (SUSAN ESTRICH RESPONDS TO JUANITA BROADDRICK'S OFFER TO SPEAK ABOUT HER RAPE -- "not interested")



SPECIAL NOTE ON THE O'REILLY'S ESTRICH INTERVIEW

Susan Estrich is not nearly as dumb as she appeared in this interview. She was tentative by design. (Hers.) I will post a separate analysis of the interview.

For now, note the following:

  1. When O'Reilly questioned her pointedly, Estrich was loath to express her support for hillary clinton openly and directly.

  2. Estrich again inadvertently reveals both missus clinton's stealth scheme and her vulnerability. (I will explain in future posts.)




1.

When the Left assesses clintoncorruption (treason, rape, or whatever), a clown-like character of the crime or the criminal is the reliable default mitigating factor, with the magnitude of the mitigation directly proportional to both the intensity of clownlike affect and the seriousness of the crime and inversely related to the distance to an election in which a clinton is running. We used to execute rapists and traitors. Today we elect them president?





2.

It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.

G. K. Chesterton

Reviews of "Commander-in-Chief" mislead; they suggest that this new ABC offering, this electuary of suds and psychologizing, is optional for missus clinton, that Rod Lurie's latest clinton agitprop is nothing more than the icing on missus clinton's inaugural cake.

The reviews miss the point of the show, (i.e., the show is not optional but necessary (though hardly sufficient) if clinton is to prevail), because the reviews fail to identify missus clinton's problem in the first place. And circular reasoning compounds the error.


THE PROBLEM

While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy on the battlefield isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous, troglodyte mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary, forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM

 


(viewing requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

STEP 1


COMPLETE ARTICLE
see descriptor morphs





3.

sandy berger haberdashery feint
(the specs, not the pants or the socks)
by Mia T, 8.23.05


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

SCHEMA PINOCCHIO
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor

by Mia T, 8.03.05


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
MAD hillary series #5
WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS
FOR THE CHILDREN
FOR AMERICA
FOR THE WORLD


They turned our bridge to the 21st century into a tunnel back into the 19th century. Back us out of that Republican tunnel, fill it in, go back across the bridge.... We'll have a giant celebration when we come back to Columbus in 2020. There's nothing more wonderful than making dreams come true.

hear hillary clinton
address to the
Democratic Leadership Council
Columbus, Ohio
7.31.05






issus clinton is a dud.

I could say she has all of bill clinton's baggage and none of his charm, except I don't find bill clinton charming. What she lacks, in my view, is lubricant. Snake oil. She grates.

It's more than simple dislike. You don't want to see her; and you definitely don't want to hear her.

Missus clinton is everyman's worst nightmare: ex-wife, fishwife, frigid wife, mother-in-law; worse, the abusive Nazi commandant in the Lina Wertmuller masterpiece. When she humiliates, which is always, she dons the military-issue undershirt, she grabs the whip.

The clintons are clearly aware of this problem and are attempting to mitigate it with veneer.

Their first ploy is to pushpoll to artificially jack up missus clinton's numbers; this is a relatively easy task, given a compliant press. This illusion of electability is intended to fool the voters, activate the herd mentality and ultimately fool the smart money of the David Geffen-Harold Ickes stripe.

It won't work. Missus clinton has 100% name recognition. Any vote she doesn't already have, she won't get. Conversely, many voters have 0% information on the clinton abuses of power and utter failures. From this it follows that many votes she has today, she won't have tomorrow.

Their second ploy is to conflate "bill" and "hillary." "The clintons" become a single construct. Missus clinton arrogates bill's "bridge to the 21st century " as "theirs." And, by lifting the lyrics straight from Pinocchio, she becomes "the man from 'hope'."

The danger here for missus clinton is that with the bridge and the hope come the abuses and the utter failures.


AFTERWORD:

Who in heaven's name is writing missus clinton's speeches? They make her sound like a cross between Pinocchio on Halcyon and a clueless tourist from Park Ridge, Illinois driving into Manhattan during rush hour. Oops.

And the plagiarizing... I mean, the clintons are shameless. And it isn't only Pinocchio.

In 2002, I wrote that the bridge to the 21st century was, arguably, clinton's most delusional conceit, that it overshot the mark by at least 1400 years.

To be fair, missus clinton's 19th-century reference is to that <yawn> retrograde 'retrograde Republicans' cliché, whereas my 7th-century reference is to the retrograde-in-fact islamofascist terrorists, whose jihadi declarations and acts of war against us the clintons willfully ignored for eight long years--allowing al Qaeda to grow exponentially in strength and reach, setting us up--very nicely, thank you--for 9/11 and its cataclysmic aftermath.





TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bewarehillary; billoreilly; clintonrape; estrich; findhillarysthesis; hillary; hillaryclinton; hillaryisafraud; juanitabroaddrick; oreilly; proxy; realrape; stophillary; susanestrich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-60 next last

1 posted on 10/27/2005 9:07:30 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Maybe the accidently injected the Botox into her brain?


2 posted on 10/27/2005 9:10:40 AM PDT by isthisnickcool (Get the incumbents out of politics!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

ping for future referance


3 posted on 10/27/2005 9:12:38 AM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Despite many FReepers who are quick to deride Bill O'Reilly, he is on the side of most (not all) Conservative issues.


4 posted on 10/27/2005 9:15:34 AM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Nice post!


5 posted on 10/27/2005 9:15:54 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: jla; WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Wolverine; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; ...

ping


7 posted on 10/27/2005 9:20:30 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Hillary Clinton will never be President. She and her Kankles are through.


8 posted on 10/27/2005 9:21:16 AM PDT by GianniV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Hillary will not run for President. Ever. Period.


9 posted on 10/27/2005 9:24:13 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (North Texas Solutions http://ntxsolutions.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Hillary and her stealth issues are on the move.


10 posted on 10/27/2005 9:24:48 AM PDT by bmwcyle (We broke Pink's Code and found a terrorist message)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

I disagree. Look at the way he treated the Swift Boat Veterans. He takes potshots at both sides (yes, more towards the Left) to maintain an "independent" image. He is really out for himself. O'Reilly is for O'Reilly. When he says "welcome to the no-spin zone" what he really means is "welcome to my spin zone." I don't begrudge him a spin zone, because everyone has one; no one can be totally objective. But don't pretend there's none there.


11 posted on 10/27/2005 9:27:31 AM PDT by DaveLoneRanger (As long as liberalism and I exist, neither one of us is safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

I disagree, but tell me why you feel that way. Do you feel that Democrats will deem her unelectable? Who will they run in her stead?

I believe that Hillary is the only one who can truly unite the Democrats (if for no other reason than because she brings back Clinton nostolgia) and Condi Rice is the only one who can unite the conservatives. Personally, Condi's views on abortion severely hurt her chances for my vote.


12 posted on 10/27/2005 9:30:34 AM PDT by DaveLoneRanger (As long as liberalism and I exist, neither one of us is safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

ping for later read


13 posted on 10/27/2005 9:36:53 AM PDT by ConservativeBamaFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
I don't agree with O'Reilly all the time, and I too think his criticisms of the Swiftees was misguided, but IMHO more his lack of understanding on military issues and the Swiftees not putting their into language the common (non-military) man can understand: namely that Swift boats are like tanks or squads, and that each can often see what's going on on the other boat. So when Kerry made a lot of his heroic claims, yeah, not all the Swiftees were on Kerry's boat, but they were nearby and could see what was going on and all meet up later to exchange accounts of what happened. So their claims to be witnesses to what really happened are valid. I think they needed to explain that more to people, maybe with graphics to show how close Swift boats could be to each other.

But on the whole, IMHO, Bill generally champions Conservative (he likes to call them "traditionalist") issues, and I'm not going to hold his lack of military experience/knowledge against him forever and dismiss everything he says from now on.

On another note, Bill is often critical of what's going on in Iraq, and has many military "experts" on his show to back his point up. But I have yet to see a single soldier back from Iraq to tell Bill that what the MSM parrots in the US is not reflective of what's happening on the ground. That's one thing I will credit Chris Matthews for, his one show several months back when he had 4 Army officers on for the whole hour to dicuss their experiences in Iraq and thoughts on the war. Matthews was unable to spin anything and could nothing more than (begrudgingly) agree and thank them for their service. Bill should wise up and do the same on his show someday - he'd change his tune.

Again, I don't always agree with him, but for the most part he's on "our" side. IMHO.

14 posted on 10/27/2005 9:42:35 AM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

Hillary will not run for President because she cannot win in a cakewalk. Look what happened to her when she ran for Senate. She wilted under the glare of the media spotlight.

As you pointed out, her events are staged. She will not be able to withstand the scrutiny of running for President.


15 posted on 10/27/2005 9:42:57 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (North Texas Solutions http://ntxsolutions.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

If she has a brain one in her fat little head she won't run.
IMHO,it would be political suicide for her to run;
you don't crap on as many people as her and her wife Bill have done,and not make an enemy or two.I am convinced there are legions of disillusioned,used-up,ruined and bitter former colleagues (those that escaped Arkancide,that is)that are lying in wait for that hat to go into the ring.You think Kerry met his Waterloo when HE ran? Wait till Hill makes her announcement!The skeletons will be flying out of the closet faster than Bill can duck a flying ashtray.And I am betting there are LOTS more grubs under the rocks that have not seen the light of day.


16 posted on 10/27/2005 9:44:06 AM PDT by gimme1ibertee (Searching for the ultimate tagline....Please Wait.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

For this purpose, I think it helps in a discussion to tell a liberal that you don't like Bill O'Reilly. Then you can move into the truly conservative realm. I don't QUITE think we can grant Bill a pass based on his lack of military prowess. I'm no military man, but I read the book and it was perfectly understandable to me.


17 posted on 10/27/2005 9:45:54 AM PDT by DaveLoneRanger (As long as liberalism and I exist, neither one of us is safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

But she -- a New York foreign -- got on the Senate, didn't she?

And what "media spotlight" are you talking about? The media are her darlings, and vice-versa.


18 posted on 10/27/2005 9:46:30 AM PDT by DaveLoneRanger (As long as liberalism and I exist, neither one of us is safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Bravo! A great compilation!


19 posted on 10/27/2005 9:47:08 AM PDT by Arizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I always enjoy your posts, you should be published.

If I ever make you mad, please tell me in advance... I wouldn't want you after me!

;->

~Corey


20 posted on 10/27/2005 9:52:48 AM PDT by corlorde (New Hampshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I swear Susan Estrich was on drugs during that interview.


21 posted on 10/27/2005 10:13:51 AM PDT by hang 'em (Hey Libs:Iraq isn't Vietnam:Plame isn't Watergate:Bush isn't Nixon:Stuck in 60's=Stuck on STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T; doug from upland

Great work as always.

Doug, I was unaware that Ms. Ostrich declined your offer of an interview w/ Ms. Broaddrick. Thank you for exposing her as the toady she is. 'Pod.


22 posted on 10/27/2005 11:46:17 AM PDT by sauropod ("Half the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important." - T.S. Eliot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Excellent! O'REILLY APPEARANCE MEMORIALIZED IN SONG.

Mia, I hope you realize that, if she becomes presdident, we will not be able to get life insurance.

23 posted on 10/27/2005 11:49:36 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
The first eBay ad got pulled for "deceptive headline." So, I created a new headline and put it back up. The first one had nine bids and 1100 views when it was pulled.

YOU MIGHT ENJOY THIS; PLEASE SEND IT ON TO YOUR FRIENDS, AND, IF YOU HAVE TIME, ASK A QUESTION

24 posted on 10/27/2005 11:57:06 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: GianniV
"Hillary Clinton will never be President-"

No one can sit back on this one!!!

If you listened to the tape Mia had up top - no questions were answered, other than "everyone will have healthcare" and that's scarey in itself! Our medical area is now so fouled up because of hillary's 'failed attempt' in the early 90's.

We did not learn about hillary from Susan's interview with Bill - she laughed and shrugged thru every question and hillary will continue to do so. That 'first woman' crap is just that! We will be ready for the 'first woman' when the 'first woman' appears.

And after seeing Condi Rice box it out with Boxer last week, maybe I've seen 'the right woman'. Condi's comments were informational and Boxer's were junk!

Three Cheers for Mia T **** you hit a homerun with this one!***

25 posted on 10/27/2005 2:10:52 PM PDT by malia (clinton - a little man who wasted 8 yrs looking for 'his legacy')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


26 posted on 10/27/2005 4:19:30 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malia
thanx.

Did you notice that during the interview last night,
before she could make her pathethic case for hillary,
Susan Estrich felt compelled to trash Condi?

Missus clinton and her agitprop machine must feel very threatened, indeed....

Speaking of which...

Demonizing Condi (USA Today's shameful photoshop exploits)
Michelle Malkin ^ | October 26, 2005 | Michelle Malkin


Beelzebub Condi

Beautiful Condi
pre-doctored version of AP photo on Yahoo! España


Regarding eyes, sometimes doctoring is journalistically essential....

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

 

"Crucial to this protective wall was the secret police, a group of private detectives hired to protect hillary and 'Saturday night bill.' Their tactics included digging up dirt on women who might be linked to bill in order to cow them into silence. There is even some evidence of possible physical intimidation."

HEAR DICK MORRIS




 

"I got the letters from Pellicano to these women intimidating them. I had tapes of conversations from Pellicano to the women. I got handwritten letters from the women."
[Pellicano played a critical role in Mr. Clinton's 1992 presidential campaign by "suppressing" "inconvenient" accounts from several women, by concocting fraudulent "proof" (later discredited) that Gennifer Flowers doctored the damning tape of clinton, and again inside the clinton operation in January 1998, four days after the Monica Lewinsky story broke, to falsely paint Monica as simply a lying stalker, a claim later discredited by clinton's own DNA.]

MARY MATALIN
1997, CBS




 

There is reason to believe that he is a rapist ("You better get some ice on that," Juanita Broaddrick says he told her concerning her bit lip), and that he bombed a country to distract attention from legal difficulties arising from his glandular life, and that... [f]urthermore, the bargain that he and his wife call a marriage refutes the axiom that opposites attract. Rather, she, as much as he, perhaps even more so, incarnates Clintonism

GEORGE WILL
SLEAZE, THE SEQUEL




Connecticut Rep. Chris Shays said on a talk radio show Wednesday that, based on secret evidence he reviewed during the impeachment controversy, he believes President Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick, not once, but twice.

Talk-show host Tom Scott of Clear Channel Broadcasting, New Haven (WELI 960) asked Shays about the mysterious impeachment "evidence room," prompting the GOP moderate to say that Broaddrick "disclosed that she had been raped, not once, but twice" to Judiciary Committee investigators.

Shays, who is often hailed by the New York Times for his independent judgment and good sense, found the evidence compelling:

"I believed that he had done it. I believed her that she had been raped 20 years ago. And it was vicious rapes, it was twice at the same event." Asked point blank if the president is a rapist, Shays said, "I would like not to say that it way. But the bottom line is that I believe that he did rape Broaddrick."

HEAR CHRISTOPHER SHAYS
'Shays Shocker Clinton Raped Broaddrick Twice'
National Review Online
By NR staff
8/02/2000




The rape took place while Bill was running for governor. Hillary came bursting into the room to talk to two people, one of whom I personally know.

She said "You won't believe what this [expletive] did now. He tried to rape some b*tch."

It was the job of these two to squelch the story.

doug from upland to Sean Hannity,
WABC, 10/16/00




 

"Who is Juanita Broaddrick? I've never heard of her!" cried Betty Friedan, the founder of modern feminism. Friedan's outburst came at last Friday's conference, entitled "The Legacy and Future of Hillary Rodham Clinton." Held at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington. D.C., the event offered a chilling microcosm of an angry, divided America.

For nearly an hour, a five-woman panel had been debating whether Hillary qualified as a "feminist heroine." I thought Broaddrick's claim of having been raped by Hillary's husband had some bearing on this point, so I broached the subject during the question-and-answer period. Friedan's dyspeptic denial followed.

Was Friedan telling the truth? Maybe. And maybe all those millions of Germans who professed ignorance of the death camps were telling the truth too. The problem is, having admitted her ignorance, Friedan showed no interest in exploring the matter further. And that was the problem with the Germans too.

Totalitarian impulses flourished at the conference. Taking a page from Soviet psychiatry, some Clintonites suggested that Hillary hating might be a mental illness.

Richard Poe
The Hillary Conspiracy




.In a letter to Mrs. Clinton recalling their meeting shortly after the reported assault occurred, she wondered about the significance of Mrs. Clinton's words to her at that time. Thank you, Mrs. Broaddrick says Mrs. Clinton told her, for "everything you do for Bill."

The not-so-subtle implication of the letter is that Mrs. Clinton is, in fact, her husband's enabler. Dealing with her husband's promiscuity and worse might keep her from dealing with the important issues facing the people of New York, namely her candidacy. One might call it a Faustian bargain except that even Mephistopheles might not lower himself to sign such a deal....

COMPLETE ARTICLE
Did he rape that woman, Juanita Broaddrick?
The Wall Street Journal
EDITORIAL
October 18, 2000





 

I remember it as though it was yesterday. I only wish that it were yesterday and maybe there would still be time to do something about what your husband, Bill Clinton, did to me. There was a political rally for Mr. Clinton's bid for governor of Arkansas. I had obligated myself to be at this rally prior to my being assaulted by your husband in April, 1978. I had made up my mind to make an appearance and then leave as soon as the two of you arrived. This was a big mistake, but I was still in a state of shock and denial. You had questioned the gentleman who drove you and Mr. Clinton from the airport. You asked him about me and if I would be at the gathering. Do you remember? You told the driver, "Bill has talked so much about Juanita", and that you were so anxious to meet me. Well, you wasted no time. As soon as you entered the room, you came directly to me and grabbed my hand. Do you remember how you thanked me, saying "we want to thank you for everything that you do for Bill". At that point, I was pretty shaken and started to walk off. Remember how you kept a tight grip on my hand and drew closer to me? You repeated your statement, but this time with a coldness and look that I have seen many times on television in the last eight years. You said, "Everything you do for Bill". You then released your grip and I said nothing and left the gathering.

What did you mean, Hillary? Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to continue to keep quiet? We both know the answer to that question.

Yes, I can answer Brit Hume's question. You are the same Hillary that you were twenty years ago. You are cold, calculating and self-serving. You cannot tolerate the thought that you will soon be without the power you have wielded for the last eight years. Your effort to stay in power will be at the expense of the state of New York. I only hope the voters of New York will wake up in time and realize that Hillary Clinton is not an honorable or an honest person.

I will end by asking if you believe the statements I made on NBC Dateline when Lisa Myers asked if I had been assaulted and raped by your husband?
 
Or perhaps, you are like Vice-President Gore and did not see the interview.

DO YOU REMEMBER?
AN OPEN LETTER TO HILLARY CLINTON
BY JUANITA BROADDRICK
SUNDAY OCT 15, 2000




 

"If you look at white women, and I think that was the key to this election, Kerry won 45% based on the exit polls--but they're generally in agreement--Kerry won 45%, Bush won 55% of white women. By contrast, Bush won only 45% of white women in 2000, so he upped is percentages by 10 points. In 1996, bill clinton won 48% of white women compared to Bob Dole's 43%. That is a huge, huge difference. I don't think you can lay all that at the doorstep of moral values. I think that this president unabashedly and abjectly took the issue of terror and used it to terrorize... white women."

HEAR HAROLD ICKES
Washington Journal
Nov. 8, 2004
C-SPAN




 

"It's no longer acceptable to say that the abuse and mistreatment of women is cultural. It should be called what it is: criminal."

Hillary Clinton
addressing the UN, 3.4.99


 

 But even as the clintons fails to grasp the scandal's metabolism
they understand all too well its most significant byproduct.
You can see it in their eyes. 
Once reflecting a Machiavellian confidence,
they now dart back and forth reflexively,
searching futilely for approval,
attempting desperately to dispel their own certain knowledge
that their moral authority is gone. . .
forever
Mia T
 
It is natural for man to indulge in the illusions of hope.
We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth,
and listen to the song of that siren
till she transforms us into beasts.
Is this the part of wise men,
engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty?
Are we disposed to be the number of those
who, having eyes, see not,
and having ears, hear not,
the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation?
For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost,
I am willing to know the whole truth;
to know the worst, and to provide for it.
Patrick Henry
 
In a dark time, the eye begins to see.
Theodore Roethke

THE DANGER OF RUNNING VICARIOUSLY
Bill O'Reilly chews up and spits out the hillary clinton candidacy
(clip included)


27 posted on 10/27/2005 4:30:49 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jla; All
FOOTNOTE 2 in larger font size.
It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.

G. K. Chesterton

Reviews of "Commander-in-Chief" mislead; they suggest that this new ABC offering, this electuary of suds and psychologizing, is optional for missus clinton, that Rod Lurie's latest clinton agitprop is nothing more than the icing on missus clinton's inaugural cake.

The reviews miss the point of the show, (i.e., the show is not optional but necessary (though hardly sufficient) if clinton is to prevail), because the reviews fail to identify missus clinton's problem in the first place. And circular reasoning compounds the error.


THE PROBLEM

While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy on the battlefield isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous, troglodyte mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary, forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM

 


(viewing requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

STEP 1


COMPLETE ARTICLE
see descriptor morphs






28 posted on 10/27/2005 4:43:18 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%

thanx :)


29 posted on 10/27/2005 4:45:15 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: willstayfree

thank you. :)


30 posted on 10/27/2005 4:45:46 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GianniV; Lunatic Fringe
Ickes and Geffen--and Estrich before she was tapped by the clinton machine--agree with you.

"I'm one of the few in the semi-inner circle who [doesn't] think she can win" [the White House].

Harold Ickes
Time, January 2005

GEFFEN UNLOADS ON HILLARY: 'SHE CAN'T WIN'

DRUDGE REPORT
Thu Feb 17 2005 23:13:00 ET

Sen. Hillary Clinton should not count on help from Hollywood mogul David Geffen in her possible run for the White House.

Geffen, who was a generous supporter and pal of Bill Clinton when he was president, trashed Hillary's prospects last night during a Q&A at the 92nd St. Y in New York City.

"She can't win, and she's an incredibly polarizing figure," the billionaire Democrat told his audience. "And ambition is just not a good enough reason."

Lloyd Grove reports in fresh editions of the NY DAILY NEWS the audience broke with "hearty applause" over Geffen's comments.

Developing...

HAROLD ICKES:
on winning the presidency by terrorizing white women

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
 
"If you look at white women, and I think that was the key to this election, Kerry won 45% based on the exit polls--but they're generally in agreement--Kerry won 45%, Bush won 55% of white women. By contrast, Bush won only 45% of white women in 2000, so he upped is percentages by 10 points. In 1996, bill clinton won 48% of white women compared to Bob Dole's 43%. That is a huge, huge difference. I don't think you can lay all that at the doorstep of moral values. I think that this president unabashedly and abjectly took the issue of terror and used it to terrorize... white women."

HEAR HAROLD ICKES
Washington Journal
Nov. 8, 2004
C-SPAN



 

"Crucial to this protective wall was the secret police, a group of private detectives hired to protect hillary and 'Saturday night bill.' Their tactics included digging up dirt on women who might be linked to bill in order to cow them into silence. There is even some evidence of possible physical intimidation."

HEAR DICK MORRIS


 

Connecticut Rep. Chris Shays said on a talk radio show Wednesday that, based on secret evidence he reviewed during the impeachment controversy, he believes President Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick, not once, but twice.

Talk-show host Tom Scott of Clear Channel Broadcasting, New Haven (WELI 960) asked Shays about the mysterious impeachment "evidence room," prompting the GOP moderate to say that Broaddrick "disclosed that she had been raped, not once, but twice" to Judiciary Committee investigators.

Shays, who is often hailed by the New York Times for his independent judgment and good sense, found the evidence compelling:

"I believed that he had done it. I believed her that she had been raped 20 years ago. And it was vicious rapes, it was twice at the same event." Asked point blank if the president is a rapist, Shays said, "I would like not to say that it way. But the bottom line is that I believe that he did rape Broaddrick."

HEAR CHRISTOPHER SHAYS
'Shays Shocker Clinton Raped Broaddrick Twice'
National Review Online
By NR staff
8/02/2000


 


Puffery coming from the clintons' perpetual promotion machine--the barely perceptible discontinuous miasmic belches--defies not only the laws of logic and decency but also the first law of thermodynamics -- conservation of energy.

That is, if one fails to considers entropy.

The second law of thermodynamics states that the quality of energy in a closed system is degraded irreversibly. Physical, chemical, and electrical energy transform into thermal energy --heat. Reversing the process, e.g., heat into physical energy, cannot fully occur within the system without an inevitable loss of energy in the form of irretrievable heat. Energy is not destroyed; it is merely unavailable for producing work. The irreversible increase of this nondisposable energy in the universe is measured by the abstract dimension called entropy....

"My two cents' worth--and I think it is the two cents' worth of everybody who worked for the Clinton Administration health care reform effort of 1993-1994--is that Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life. Heading up health-care reform was the only major administrative job she has ever tried to do. And she was a complete flop at it. She had neither the grasp of policy substance, the managerial skills, nor the political smarts to do the job she was then given. And she wasn't smart enough to realize that she was in over her head and had to get out of the Health Care Czar role quickly.... there is no reason to think that she would be anything but an abysmal president"

 

J. Bradford DeLong
professor of economics, Berkeley
veteran of Clinton Administration
clinton Administration VETERAN / BERKELEY PROFESSOR:
"Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life."

There is a lot of talk these days, most notably by voluble nervous Democratic operatives like Susan Estrich, about the clintons sucking up the oxygen, but no one is paying attention to the irreversible transformation of light into heat by the clintons.

Once we understand that the latter process is irreversible, we will begin to do what we must.

Mia T, 6.23.05
CLINTON RAPES, REVISIONISM, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY (an update)




COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005

31 posted on 10/27/2005 5:20:45 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

thanx.
an interesting vowel substitution bump.... ;)


32 posted on 10/27/2005 5:24:20 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: gimme1ibertee

Great points (and imagery). ;)
It would be naive to think there aren't multiple coups in the works.
Missus clinton is despised by many on the left.


33 posted on 10/27/2005 5:30:36 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: corlorde

thanx. :)


34 posted on 10/27/2005 5:31:47 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Arizona

thank you :)


35 posted on 10/27/2005 5:32:20 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

Liberal Bill put down ultra-liberal Hill.

My word, how courageous of the mouth.


36 posted on 10/27/2005 6:20:29 PM PDT by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Spirited

"Liberal Bill?" He has some Liberal tendencies, especially when it comes to economics/environment, but for the most part he is a Conservative. IMHO


37 posted on 10/27/2005 6:29:47 PM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
That was OUTSTANDING! As good as any segment Bill O'Reilly has ever done. He absolutely DESTROYED Susan Estrich and did it so matter-of-factly. That was must see t.v.

Thanks so much for the ping Mia T.

Hooray Bill O'Reilly!

Run Hillary Run!

38 posted on 10/27/2005 8:21:30 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

As usual, Outstanding!


39 posted on 10/28/2005 1:50:22 AM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; Timesink; VPMWife78; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; FoxGirl; Mr. Bob; xflisa; ...
FoxFan ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.

40 posted on 10/28/2005 4:42:19 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Is it possible that BJ Clinton is a woman hater who can not have normal sex?
He rapes or has dummies kneel before him.


41 posted on 10/28/2005 4:55:17 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (I shot an error into the air. It's still going everywhere. R. A. HEINLEIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

>Condi Rice is the only one who can unite the conservatives.

Nobody can unite conservatives......


42 posted on 10/28/2005 7:55:09 PM PDT by phatoldphart (Did the bold italics work?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Thanks for the ping!


43 posted on 10/28/2005 8:27:44 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mia T; Richard Poe
A lot of this you spell out in your book, Richard. That was a one-sitting read.


If you want a Google GMail account, FReepmail me.

44 posted on 10/29/2005 10:43:57 AM PDT by rdb3 (Does this wheelchair make me look fat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

You're a blessing Mia T, keep up the GREAT work!

The media is flossing it's teeth reading for President Hillary..

Look at this article, the gushing is so frantic,
that'd you think Hillary has a movie coming out,
or something to sell!

Oh yeah, ..how could we forget,
Hillary's selling herself,
and her minions are helping ready the masses
for her climb-in-power!

http://www.thejournalnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051030/NEWS02/510300318/1026/NEWS10


45 posted on 10/30/2005 11:40:45 AM PST by reformjoy (Hillary - The STUFF of Nightmares !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malia

"And after seeing Condi Rice box it out with Boxer last week, maybe I've seen 'the right woman'. Condi's comments were informational and Boxer's were junk!"

When did this happen and where were they? I'd like to see or hear it.


46 posted on 11/20/2005 12:44:19 AM PST by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
A very enlightening clip, Mia, thanks! Wow, Chrissy thinks PeeWee Herman would win if he ran against Hillary! We'll soon see how he runs from those words!

Does anyone else think that Maureen Dowd was trying to act sultry & sexy with Matthews? I did, and it demonstrates how desperate she acts around men with whom she is attracted. But it sure was hard to get passed her lisp (lithp).
47 posted on 11/20/2005 6:32:23 AM PST by demkicker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swheats

I am sorry to disappoint your excitement about having Condi win the Presidency, but if it between Hillary and Condi, Hillary will win because all the conservatives will stay home. They will not have an Abortion rights person in the White House even if it means losing an election. The conservatives think this issue is too important to ignore.


48 posted on 11/20/2005 7:07:50 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

I think my request was on Condi and Boxer's meeting last week. Do you have that?


49 posted on 11/20/2005 10:50:19 AM PST by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: swheats

That was a month ago on C-SPAN - you know - where the dems think they have to drill the Republicans. Ms. Rice held her own as she would on any program. That's the best I can do for ya!!


50 posted on 11/20/2005 7:17:35 PM PST by malia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson