Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

sandy berger haberdashery feint (the specs, not the pants or the socks)
8.23.05 | Mia T

Posted on 08/23/2005 8:36:13 AM PDT by Mia T

sandy berger haberdashery feint
(the specs, not the pants or the socks)


by Mia T, 8.23.05


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)


A SANDY-BERGER silly-gism:

Saddam shredded people to torture and terrorize.
Therefore, if we torture and terrorize Berger, we will find out what he shredded.

Would this fly with the Gitmo-obsessed crowd, I wonder....



WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM?
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security?



Why hillary clinton should never be allowed anywhere near the Oval Office... or any position of power--THE SERIES
REASON 1: MISSUS CLINTON HIRED JAMIE GORELICK

While it is true that The Gorelick Wall was the convenient device of a cowardly self-serving president, The Wall's aiding and abetting of al Qaeda was largely incidental, (the pervasiveness of the clintons' Nobel-Peace-Prize calculus notwithstanding).

The Wall was engineered primarily to protect a corrupt self-serving president. The metastasis of al Qaeda and 9/11 were simply the cost of doing business, clinton-style.

Further confirmation that the Wall was cover for clinton corruption:

  • Gorelick's failure to disclose the fact that she authored the memo that was the efficient cause of 911

  • Gorelick's surreal presence on the 911 commission investigating Gorelick's Justice Department, a maneuver that effectively removes from the universe of witnesses a central witness, Gorelick, even as it uniquely positions a central player, Gorelick, to directly shape the commission's conclusions. (Is there any question which two people are responsible for Gorelick's insertion on the commission?)

Conversely, that it never occurred to anyone on the commission that Gorelick's flagrant conflict of interest renders her presence on the commission beyond farce calls into question the commission's judgment if not its integrity. Washington's mutual protection racket writ large, I suspect....

The Gorelick Wall is consistent with, and an international extension of, two essential acts committed in tandem, Filegate, the simultaneous empowering of the clintons and disemboweling of clinton adversaries, and the clinton Putsch, the firing and replacement of every U.S. attorney extant.

... Once the clintons' own U.S. attorneys were in place, once the opposition was disemboweled by the knowledge that their raw FBI files had been in the possession of the clintons, once domestic law enforcement was effectively blinded to foreign data by Gorelick's Wall, the clintons were free to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder.

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

Reverse Gorelick
by Mia T, 4.15.04
QUINN IN THE MORNING (ESSAY DISCUSSED)
(
MP3, REAL, WINDOWS MEDIA, WINAMP)

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005

 



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911commission; abledanger; atta; clintoncorruption; clintonscandals; clintontreason; doxinsox; gorelickwall; jamiegorelick; mohamedatta; sandyberger

1 posted on 08/23/2005 8:36:20 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

ping


2 posted on 08/23/2005 8:37:56 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla; WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Wolverine; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; ...

ping


3 posted on 08/23/2005 8:38:33 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla

bump


4 posted on 08/23/2005 8:53:13 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
REASON 1: MISSUS CLINTON HIRED JAMIE GORELICK

Where is your support for this statement? Did I miss it?

You always have great info, your style is defiantly unique.

5 posted on 08/23/2005 8:59:58 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
thanx. :)

Hillary Appointee Tied to 9/11 Blunder (excerpt)

According to now retired New York Times columnist William Safire, Gorelick was tapped for her post by Hillary ally Webster Hubbell after he resigned from the Justice Department in 1994 to face charges of overbilling his legal clients.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Gorelick fulfilled much the same role as Hubbell had, acting as Hillary's "eyes and ears at the Justice Department."

While news of the CIA's scuttled 9/11 warning was a top story throughout the day on Friday - with nearly two dozen mainstream press reports, including a front page story in the New York Times - none of the reports so much as mentioned Gorelick's name, let alone her connection to Mrs. Clinton.

The former first lady will almost undoubtedly seek the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination based in part on what the media describe as her strong national security credentials.

Currently developing related original sources.

6 posted on 08/23/2005 9:13:30 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
Where is your support for this statement? Did I miss it?

Did you click on the link that points to another FR thread?
7 posted on 08/23/2005 9:14:55 AM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
While news of the CIA's scuttled 9/11 warning was a top story throughout the day on Friday - with nearly two dozen mainstream press reports, including a front page story in the New York Times - none of the reports so much as mentioned Gorelick's name, let alone her connection to Mrs. Clinton.

We need to help get the word out for sure!

8 posted on 08/23/2005 9:25:19 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

bump
NO ONE interested in SELF-preservation should want a clinton back in the Oval Office. EVER.


9 posted on 08/23/2005 9:35:59 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine

bump


10 posted on 08/23/2005 9:46:49 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

"Berger was the head of the NSA, and he was in charge of countless documents like these when he was in the White House. And here Clinton is defending him by saying mistakes like these are just plain funny because they're so typical. Berger steals documents in the lead-up the 9/11 Commission hearings because - according to his lawyer! - he was too distracted stealing notes that he couldn't keep things straight. And Bill Clinton is laughing it off. Why? Because that's so like Sandy! He was always a slob with vital national security documents."
http://www.davidstuff.com/incorrect/goldberg6.htm


11 posted on 08/23/2005 10:27:59 AM PDT by YaYa123 (@"Bergerize" =To Steal Inedible Classified Documents.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

"clinton is laughing it off"...

Isn't he really laughing at us?

bump


12 posted on 08/23/2005 10:37:07 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
clinton has said - he did it because he could!

9/11 Commission:
Berger, Richard Clarke, & Cohen testified on 3-24-04.
President Bush and Cheney testified 4-29-04.
clinton testified ------?

Berger stole classified documents ---------?
Berger's stealing exposed 7/2004 (earliest I found was 7/17/04)

Able Danger -Atta - was reported to the clinton Administration Jan-Feb 2000.
Pillpott testified before the 9/11 commission 10 days before the report was released. 9/11 commission says Atta was not mentioned and have lost all notes.

What information was Berger removing.

The most truthful statement clinton has made is -- he did it because he could. Because the MSM let him, their agenda is the same. I have been away and catching up on these details --- please correct the dates I have wrong. When I saw Slade Gorton on O'Reilly, well sleazy is what discribes him. But then I've heard he wants to be on the 9th Circuit Court ---. There are dots to be connected!

13 posted on 08/23/2005 11:51:58 AM PDT by malia (President Bush - a man of honor!! clinton as President a man of horror)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: malia
bump!

 
 
deconstructing clinton… "just because I could"
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)   
 


14 posted on 08/23/2005 11:59:23 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jla; All
BILL CLINTON'S CINDY SHEEHANS (courtesy Sean Hannity)
15 posted on 08/23/2005 2:59:07 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


16 posted on 08/23/2005 4:11:42 PM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Nicely done, T.


17 posted on 08/23/2005 6:42:19 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Thanks for your work on Sponge Sandy Square Pants, sopping up all the blood from The Democratic Crime Syndicate's poster criminals, Bill & Hillary.


18 posted on 08/23/2005 8:28:04 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

An "I missed this post" BUMP!


19 posted on 08/24/2005 11:15:11 AM PDT by Pagey (Whether Hillary Clintons' attacks on America are a success or a failure depends upon YOU TOO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bttt


20 posted on 08/24/2005 11:15:59 AM PDT by Pagey (Whether Hillary Clintons' attacks on America are a success or a failure depends upon YOU TOO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGalt
thanx :)
THE ROOTS OF CINDY SHEEHAN
(COURTESY JAMES TARANTO VIA RUSH LIMBAUGH)
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

 
THE LEFT'S RECKLESS TET-OFFENSIVE-GAMBIT REPLAY:
the left's jihad against America is killing our troops, aiding + abetting the terrorists and imperiling all Americans2


WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM?
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security?



Why hillary clinton should never be allowed anywhere near the Oval Office... or any position of power--THE SERIES
REASON 1: MISSUS CLINTON HIRED JAMIE GORELICK


sandy berger haberdashery feint
(the specs, not the pants or the socks)


BIN LADEN FINGERS CLINTON FOR TERROR SUCCESS (SEE FOOTAGE)
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE


"I support the poor but not the war on poverty."


"SONNY" CALLAHAN + BILL CLINTON'S CINDY SHEEHANS


BILL CLINTON'S CINDY SHEEHANS (courtesy Sean Hannity)


THE ROOTS OF CINDY SHEEHAN
(COURTESY JAMES TARANTO VIA RUSH LIMBAUGH)

21 posted on 08/25/2005 9:00:31 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jla; Nancee; Gail Wynand; All

This all screams the question, "Why has the media allocated so little focus on this?"

... The average reporter... once had a stronger loyalty to his craft than his biases -- perhaps the path to the good old days is through the future, and current journalism majors can lead us back to excellence.

Today however,

... [T]he media's five-to-one ratio of liberals to conservatives (as was reported by the Pew Foundation in 2004) is having a deleterious impact on us all in that we're only fully protected when the GOP commit the offense.

... Every once in a while a story of great magnitude arises in a way that provokes such little initial coverage that it effectively hides in plain sight. When this occurs, it's either because the original news worthiness appears to be at a lower level of importance, or because those with direct and indirect vested interests have enough aggregate influence so as to play down the story in question.

The Watergate scandal is an example of the first; Sandy Berger removing and extinguishing protected records of national security exemplifies the second.

... What happened to that kind of passionate investigative journalism? Sandy Berger stealing and destroying classified documents is a story with so many startling facts already in evidence, even the layman newshound should think to ask, "What else is being hidden and what are the motives?"

Why is robbing national security documents less important than robbing campaign documents?

Worse than Watergate
Front Page ^ | Jan 5, 2007 | Alan Nathan


"What is government itself but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary."

James Madison


 

When the founders granted 'The Press' special dispensation, they never considered the possibility that traitors in our midst would game the system. But that is precisely what is happening today. (Hate America? Support jihad? Become a 'journalist!')

This was bound to happen.

The premise behind the First Amendment as it applies to the press--that a vigilant watchdog is necessary, sufficient--indeed, possible--to protect against man's basest instincts--is tautologically flawed: The fox guarding the White House, if you will.

Walter Lippmann, the 20th-century American columnist, wrote, "A free press is not a privilege, but an organic necessity in a great society." True in theory. True even in Lippmann's quaint mid-20th-century America, perhaps. But patently false in this postmodern era of the bubbas and the Pinches.

When a free and great society is hijacked by a seditious bunch of dysfunctional, power-hungry malcontents and elitists, it will remain neither free nor great for long. When hijacked by them in the midst of asymmetric warfare, it will soon not remain at all.

If President George W. Bush is serious about winning the War on Terror, he will aggressively pursue the enemy in our midst.

Targeting and defeating the enemy in our midst is, by far, the more difficult task and will measure Bush's resolve and courage (and his independence from the MPRDC (mutual protection racket in DC)) more than any pretty speech, more even than 'staying the course.'

 

"It is hard to believe that a man is telling the truth when you know that you would lie if you were in his place."

H. L. Mencken
 

IN A 'PINCH': RETHINKING THE FIRST AMENDMENT
(Which came first, the 'journalist' or the traitor?)





22 posted on 01/09/2007 7:49:18 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson