Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WMD--THE DEMOCRAT BETRAYAL (EAT THIS HARRY REID! YOUR OWN PARTY SAID SADDAM HAD WMD BEFORE W. DID!)
Front Page Magazine ^ | 11/02/05

Posted on 11/03/2005 3:00:30 PM PST by MikeA

As I have often said (and resaid) the inexcusable element in the Democrats' attacks on their President in the midst of a war is that they are betraying a war they authorized in the first place. In the wake of Harry Reid's unhinged accusations the Republican National Committee has posted a collection of statements by Democratic Party leaders reminding us why we went to war.

DEM OFFICIALS HAVE WARNED ABOUT WMDs IN IRAQ FOR YEARS

Former President Bill Clinton:

President Clinton: "We Have To Defend Our Future From These Predators Of The 21st Century. They Feed On The Free Flow Of Information And Technology. They Actually Take Advantage Of The Freer Movement Of People, Information And Ideas. And They Will Be All The More Lethal If We Allow Them To Build Arsenals Of Nuclear, Chemical And Biological Weapons And The Missiles To Deliver Them. We Simply Cannot Allow That To Happen. There Is No More Clear Example Of This Threat Than Saddam Hussein's Iraq. His Regime Threatens The Safety Of His People, The Stability Of His Region And The Security Of All The Rest Of Us." (President Clinton, Remarks To Joint Chiefs Of Staff And Pentagon Staff, 2 /17/98)

President Clinton: "Earlier Today I Ordered America's Armed Forces To Strike Military And Security Targets In Iraq... Their Mission Is To Attack Iraq's Nuclear, Chemical And Biological Weapons Programs And Its Military Capacity To Threaten Its Neighbors ..." ("Text Of Clinton Statement On Iraq Attack," Agence France Presse, 12/17/98)

Former Vice President Al Gore:

Gore: "You Know, In 1991, I Was One Of Those Who Put Partisanship Completely Aside And Supported President Bush At That Time In Launching The Gulf War. And In That War, We Saw How Saddam Had Threatened His Neighbors And Was Trying To Get Nuclear Weapons, Chemical Weapons, And Biological Weapons. And We're Not Going To Allow Him To Succeed." (CNN's "Larry King Live," 12/16/98)

Gore: "[I]f You Allow Someone Like Saddam Hussein To Get Nuclear Weapons, Ballistic Missiles, Chemical Weapons, Biological Weapons, How Many People Is He Going To Kill With Such Weapons? He's Already Demonstrated A Willingness To Use These Weapons ..." (CNN's "Larry King Live," 12/16/98)

Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY):

Sen. Clinton: "I Voted For The Iraqi Resolution. I Consider The Prospect Of A Nuclear-Armed Saddam Hussein Who Can Threaten Not Only His Neighbors, But The Stability Of The Region And The World, A Very Serious Threat To The United States." (Senator Hillary Clinton [D-NY], Press Conference, January 22, 2003)

Sen. Clinton: "In The Four Years Since The Inspectors, Intelligence Reports Show That Saddam Hussein Has Worked To Rebuild His Chemical And Biological Weapons Stock, His Missile Delivery Capability, And His Nuclear Program. ... It Is Clear, However, That If Left Unchecked, Saddam Hussein Will Continue To Increase His Capability To Wage Biological And Chemical Warfare And Will Keep Trying To Develop Nuclear Weapons." (Sen. Hillary Clinton, Congressional Record, 10/10/02, p. S10288)

Sen. John Kerry (D-MA):

Sen. Kerry: "The Crisis Is Even More Threatening By Virtue Of The Fact That Iraq Has Developed A Chemical Weapons Capability, And Is Pursuing A Nuclear Weapons Development Program." (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 10/2/90, p. S14332)

Sen. Kerry: "If You Don't Believe ... Saddam Hussein Is A Threat With Nuclear Weapons, Then You Shouldn't Vote For Me." (Ronald Brownstein, "On Iraq, Kerry Appears Either Torn Or Shrewd," Los Angeles Times, 1/31/03)

Former Sen. John Edwards (D-NC):

Sen. Edwards: "Serving On The Intelligence Committee And Seeing Day After Day, Week After Week, Briefings On Saddam's Weapons Of Mass Destruction And His Plans On Using Those Weapons, He Cannot Be Allowed To Have Nuclear Weapons, It's Just That Simple. The Whole World Changes If Saddam Ever Has Nuclear Weapons." (MSNBC's "Buchanan And Press," 1/7/03)

Sen. Edwards: "The Question Is Whether We're Going To Let This Man [Saddam] Who's Been Developing Weapons Of Mass Destruction Continue To Develop Weapons Of Mass Destruction, Get Nuclear Capability, And Get To The Place Where If We're Going To Stop Him, If He Invades A Country Around Him, It'll Cost Millions Of Lives As Opposed To Thousands Of Lives." (MSNBC's "Hardball," 2/6/03)

Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV):

Reid: "The Problem Is Not Nuclear Testing; It Is Nuclear Weapons ... The Number Of Third World Countries With Nuclear Capabilities Seems To Grow Daily. Saddam Hussein's Near Success With Developing A Nuclear Weapon Should Be An Eye-Opener For Us All." (Sen. Harry Reid, Congressional Record, 8/3/92, p. S11188)

Sen. Evan Bayh (D-IN):

Bayh: "In My Opinion - And I Do, As You Know, I'm Fairly Hawkish On Iraq. I'm Inclined To Support Going In There And Dealing With Saddam. But I Think That Case Needs To Be Made On A Separate Basis - His Possession Of Biological And Chemical Weapons, His Desire To Get Nuclear Weapons, His Proven Track Record Of Attacking His Neighbors And Others." (CNN's "Late Edition," 8/4/02)

Bayh: "The Question Is, Do You Want Saddam Hussein Having Chemical Weapons, Having Biological Weapons, Possibly One Day Having A Nuclear Weapon? Do You Want To Have To Deal With That? And If The Answer Is No, Then What Do You Do About It And When Do You Do Something About It?" (CNN's "Live Event/Special," 12/1/01)

Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE):

Biden: "First Of All, We Don't Know Exactly What He Has. ... We Know He Continues To Attempt To Gain Access To Additional Capability, Including Nuclear Capability. There Is A Real Debate How Far Off That Is, Whether It's A Matter Of Years Or Whether It's A Matter Of Less Than That, And So There's Much We Don't Know." (NBC's "Meet The Press," 8/4/02)

Gov. Bill Richardson (D-NM):

Richardson: "The Threat Of Nuclear Proliferation Is One Of The Big Challenges That We Have Now, Especially By States That Have Nuclear Weapons, Outlaw States Like Iraq." (ABC's "Good Morning America," 5/29/98)

Former Sen. Bob Graham (D-FL):

Sen. Graham: "I Don't Know If I've Seen All The Evidence, But I've Seen Enough To Be Satisfied That There Has Been A Continuing Effort By Saddam Hussein Since The End Of The Gulf War, Particularly Since 1998, To Re-Establish And Enhance Iraq's Capacity Of Weapons Of Mass Destruction, Chemical, Biological And Nuclear." (CBS' "Face The Nation," 12/8/02)

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL):

Durbin: "One Of The Most Compelling Threats We In This Country Face Today Is The Proliferation Of Weapons Of Mass Destruction. Threat Assessments Regularly Warn Us Of The Possibility That North Korea, Iran, Iraq, Or Some Other Nation May Acquire Or Develop Nuclear Weapons." (Sen. Dick Durbin, Congressional Record, 9/30/99, p. S11673)

Sen. Russell Feingold (D-WI):

Feingold: "With Regard To Iraq, I Agree, Iraq Presents A Genuine Threat, Especially In The Form Of Weapons Of Mass Destruction, Chemical, Biological, And Potentially Nuclear Weapons. I Agree That Saddam Hussein Is Exceptionally Dangerous And Brutal, If Not Uniquely So, As The President Argues." (Sen. Russell Feingold [D-WI], Congressional Record, 10/9/05, p. S10147)

Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL):

Nelson: "And My Own Personal View Is, I Think Saddam Has Chemical And Biological Weapons, And I Expect That He Is Trying To Develop A Nuclear Weapon. So At Some Point, We Might Have To Act Precipitously." (CNN's "Late Edition," 8/25/02)

Nelson: "Well, I Believe He Has Chemical And Biological Weapons. I Think He's Trying To Develop Nuclear Weapons. And The Fact That He Might Use Those Is A Considerable Threat To Us." (CNBC, "Tim Russert," 9/14/02)

Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV):

Sen. Byrd: "The Last U.N. Weapons Inspectors Left Iraq In October Of 1998. We Are Confident That Saddam Hussein Retains Some Stockpiles Of Chemical And Biological Weapons, And That He Has Since Embarked On A Crash Course To Build Up His Chemical And Biological Warfare Capabilities. Intelligence Reports Indicate That He Is Seeking Nuclear Weapons ..." ("Threats And Responses," The New York Times, 10/4/02)

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA):

Pelosi: "Others Have Talked About This Threat That Is Posed By Saddam Hussein. Yes, He Has Chemical Weapons, He Has Biological Weapons, He Is Trying To Get Nuclear Weapons." (Rep. Nancy Pelosi, Congressional Record, 10/10/02, p. H7777)

Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA):

Harman: "I Certainly Think [Saddam's] Developing Nuclear Capability, Which, Fortunately, The Israelis Set Back 20 Years Ago With Their Preemptive Attack, Which, In Hindsight, Looks Pretty Darn Good." (Fox News' "The Big Story," 8/27/02)

Former Rep. Dick Gephardt (D-MO):

"Gephardt Said He's Seen 'A Large Body Of Intelligence Information Over A Long Time That He Is Working On And Has Weapons Of Mass Destruction. Before 1991, He Was Close To Having A Nuclear Device. Now, You'll Get A Debate About Whether It's One Year Away Or Five Or Six." (Morton M. Kondracke, "Gephardt Pushes Consensus Action Against Iraq Threat," Roll Call, 9/23/02)

Former Secretary Of State Madeline Albright:

Madeline Albright: "Iraq Is A Long Way From [Here], But What Happens There Matters A Great Deal Here, For The Risk That The Leaders Of A Rogue State Will Use Nuclear, Chemical Or Biological Weapons Against Us Or Our Allies Is The Greatest Security Threat We Face, And It Is A Threat Against Which We Must And Will Stand Firm." ("Secretary Of State Madeleine Albright, Secretary Of Defense William Cohen And National Security Adviser Sandy Berger Participate In Town Hall Meeting," Federal News Service, 2/18/98)


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrats; democratsonwmd; harryreid; iraq; iraqwar; iraqwarfacts; iraqwarquotes; prewarintelligence; quotes; saddam; wmd; wmdiraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: MikeA

Do you think Thomas was lying when he called Jesus "God" in John 20:28?

There is only one right answer you know.
Thomas was telling the truth.


41 posted on 11/03/2005 6:40:21 PM PST by pro610 (Faith the size of a mustard seed can move mountains.Praise Jesus Christ!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: pro610
"The Catholic Church also opposes the Mormons false faith. I,ll give you the Vatican documents if you want them?"

I know they do. They "oppose" (if that is the right word) the Protestant faith too. So what? I don't take it to mean I have to proselytize every Protestant I meet or every Mormon or every Jew. It sure does not mean you have to insult people. And it certainly does not mean that the target of your proselytizing can't RIGHTFULLY tell you to shut up and mind your own business.

My denomination and why I have chosen it is NOT anyone's business unless I decide otherwise.

42 posted on 11/03/2005 6:40:51 PM PST by Hound of the Baskervilles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
"Until you bother to go to the source to learn of the truth of LDS teachings, I really have nothing more to say to you especially seeing as you have no respect for the sacred beliefs of others in the really unchristian manner you attack them."

Right on!!!

43 posted on 11/03/2005 6:43:08 PM PST by Hound of the Baskervilles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
"Anyway, why people can't worship God and allow others the same privilege without having to be ugly and to tear down what's sacred to others, or to lie about it, is beyond me."

I don't get it either.

"And they do this all the while hypocritically accusing others of being unChristian. I am certain God will make them answer for it. "

The first time someone told me my denomination was a cult I was so insulted and angry!!! What terrible manners! How impolite! Who the hell do these people think they are!! What nerve!!

"Anyway, thanks for the support."

You're welcome.

44 posted on 11/03/2005 6:50:03 PM PST by Hound of the Baskervilles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Hound of the Baskervilles
The Catholic Church does not oppose Protestant,s from a Salvation viewpoint.
You don,t know what your talking about.

The Mormons are very good people who believe that they can achieve Salvation thru good works,the Muslims also believe the same thing.
At least the Mormons have some knowledge of the Bible and can be lead to the truth by people pointing to scripture to set them on the right path towards Salvation.
45 posted on 11/03/2005 7:14:25 PM PST by pro610 (Faith the size of a mustard seed can move mountains. Praise Jesus Christ!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Hound of the Baskervilles

"The first time someone told me my denomination was a cult I was so insulted and angry!!! What terrible manners! How impolite! Who the hell do these people think they are!! What nerve!!"

There's is truth and beauty in all faiths. To just trample on that truth and beauty, and what's sacred and divine to others, is antithetical to everything I know about Jesus Christ and his teachings. I grew up Catholic and my entire family is still Catholic. I really cherish and honor my Catholic background. It gave me the foundation of faith from which I operate today. I later became LDS, but that doesn't in any way diminish Catholicism or the Catholic faith or say anything bad about the church. It's just for me what I found in the LDS Church spoke to me and gave me what I was looking for in my life. So I too am insulted to see Catholics and Catholicism held up to derision by the ignorant and mean.


46 posted on 11/03/2005 7:50:21 PM PST by MikeA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
Please show us where in the Bible it says John Smith has the authority as a prophet of God to deny that Jesus Christ is God in the flesh???
47 posted on 11/03/2005 8:35:12 PM PST by pro610 (Faith the size of a mustard seed can move mountains. Praise Jesus Christ!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

This should be added to all Government HS curriculums.


48 posted on 11/03/2005 8:35:52 PM PST by Whitewasher (Would u like America to be a goat nation in the millennium to come? Keep pushing the "Roadmap" bull!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeA; ntnychik; devolve; PhilDragoo; bitt; Boazo; Lady Jag; Smartass

49 posted on 11/03/2005 8:39:12 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeA; holdonnow; Kenny Bunk; Laura_Ingraham; doug from upland; Blurblogger

here's another link to keep, an old article but very rimely...

http://www.nationalreview.com/murdock/murdock010603.asp

Dems Need a Houseclean
No innocents.
By Deroy Murdock

Even with Trent Lott (R, Miss.) relegated to the Senate's backbenches, Democrats want the issue of Republicans and race front and center.


"How can they jump on [Lott] when they're out there repressing, trying to run black voters away from the polls and running under the Confederate flag in Georgia and South Carolina?" Bill Clinton wondered on CNN December 18. "I mean, look at their whole record. He just embarrassed them by saying in Washington what they do on the back roads every day."

Senator Hillary Clinton (D., New York) said two days later, "If anyone thinks that one person stepping down from a leadership position cleanses the Republican party of their constant exploitation of race, then I think you're naive."

Incoming House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California added: "The Republican party still needs to do much more to remove the issue of race and any of its symbols from our political process."

Before lecturing Republicans, Democrats should mop up their side of the political spectrum.

Bill Clinton, for starters, approaches this matter in mud-soaked boots. As NewsMax.com recalled on December 22, then-Governor Clinton was among three state officials the NAACP sued in 1989 under the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965. "Plaintiffs offered plenty of proof of monolithic voting along racial lines, intimidation of black voters and candidates and other official acts that made voting harder for blacks," the Arkansas Gazette reported December 6, 1989. It added: "the evidence at the trial was indeed overwhelming that the Voting Rights Act had been violated."

A three-judge federal panel ordered Clinton and Arkansas's then-Attorney General Steve Clark and then-Secretary of State William J. McCuen to redraw electoral districts to maximize black voting strength.

During his 12-year tenure, Governor Clinton never approved a state civil-rights law. However, he did issue birthday proclamations honoring Confederate leaders Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee. He also signed Act 116 in 1987. That statute reconfirmed that the star directly above the word "Arkansas" in the state flag "is to commemorate the Confederate States of America." Arkansas also observed Confederate Flag Day every year Clinton served. The governor's silence was consent.

Arkansas' former governor, the late Orval Eugene Faubus, attended Bill Clinton's 1979 gubernatorial inauguration, where the two pols hugged, as Arkansas Democrat-Gazette editorial page editor Paul Greenberg recalls. Faubus, of course, resisted the integration of Little Rock's Central High School in 1957. He actually deployed National Guard soldiers to bar nine black students from entering. Republican President Dwight Eisenhower dispatched soldiers from the 101st Airborne Division to break that logjam and give the black teens a fighting chance to learn. Clinton once lauded that same Faubus as a "man of significant ability."

Just this fall, Clinton praised Arkansas' late Democratic senator J. William Fulbright, a notorious segregationist who opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act. He also signed the Southern Manifesto, which denounced the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark Brown vs. Board of Education school desegregation decision in 1954. Clinton called Fulbright "My mentor, a visionary, a humanitarian."

But even with that record, Bill Clinton is Rosa Parks compared to his party's most senior senator. Until the 108th Congress convenes tomorrow, Robert Byrd (D, W.V.) remains the Senate's president pro tempore, the third in the line of presidential succession behind Vice President Dick Cheney and House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R, Illinois). Byrd, who also chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee, joined the Ku Klux Klan in 1942 at age 24. He resigned in 1943. But in 1946, he wrote this to the KKK's Imperial Wizard: "The Klan is needed today as never before and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia."

Bryd was elected to West Virginia's House of Delegates that year. In 1947, he criticized the military's proposed integration. In a letter to segregationist senator Theodore Bilbo (D, Miss.), Byrd said he would "never submit to fight beneath the banner [the American flag] with a Negro by my side. Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds."

Byrd filibustered against the 1964 Civil Rights Act, joining Albert Gore Sr. and 19 other Democrats (and only four Republicans) in voting against that groundbreaking legislation. He fought Thurgood Marshall's Supreme Court nomination before becoming Senate Democratic leader from 1977 to 1989.

Byrd says he regrets his Klan membership. As a December 23 Wall Street Journal editorial noted, Byrd urged young Americans in 1997 to pursue public life. However, "Be sure you avoid the Ku Klux Klan. Don't get that albatross around your neck. Once you've made that mistake, you inhibit your operations in the political arena."

Byrd was a buzzard on the March 4, 2001 edition of Fox News Sunday. Asked about race relations, Byrd told host Tony Snow: "There are white niggers. I've seen a lot of white niggers in my time. I'm going to use that word." He apologized and said, "The phrase dates back to my boyhood and has no place in today's society."

Byrd will appear next February in the $51 million Warner Brothers Civil War epic, Gods and Generals. Although he is age 84, Byrd will portray Confederate general Paul J. Semmes, who owned at least a dozen slaves. He was badly wounded at Gettysburg and died July 10, 1863 at age 48.

Byrd's Senate colleague, Ernest Hollings (D, S.C.), meanwhile, told reporters on December 14, 1993 that he attended international summits alongside "these potentates from down in Africa." He continued, "rather than eating each other, they'd just come up and get a good square meal in Geneva." There also would be no debate today about flying the Confederate flag over South Carolina's statehouse had then-governor Hollings not defiantly hoisted it above the state capitol in 1962.


(read more...it's terrific!)


50 posted on 11/03/2005 9:04:49 PM PST by bitt ("..the very obsession of your public service must be Duty, Honor, Country." Gen. Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch


Katie Couric?


51 posted on 11/03/2005 10:10:34 PM PST by devolve (<--- (--------(--do not check out my lame FR home page--)--------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Hound of the Baskervilles
PS. I am not a Mormon. But if I was, I would give you a piece of my mind. Wait, I just did. And you deserve it.

Sometimes, it's hard to understand anger born from ignorance, but everyone has a right to speak thier mind no matter how illiterate they may be.

52 posted on 11/04/2005 3:46:38 AM PST by sirchtruth (Words Mean Things...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
Look, I have no problem with you wanting to access God's Truth, you should, but you're not going to find it thru Mormonism. JS was a false prophet PROVEN many times over, and I realize being sucked into a cult it would be hard to break free of their entrapments.

There is ONLY one way to God and that is thru Jesus Christ, not through some farcical, money digging, con artist, who couldn't interpret his way out of a paper bag.

BTW, do you see God's kingdom here on earth, I don't, especially at some little piece of dirt in Missouri...Remember a prophet is not a prophet if what they proclaim never passes. Are you still waiting?

53 posted on 11/04/2005 4:03:35 AM PST by sirchtruth (Words Mean Things...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

So were the Dems lying then or are they lying now?


54 posted on 11/04/2005 4:06:09 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pro610
"Please show us where in the Bible it says John Smith has the authority as a prophet of God to deny that Jesus Christ is God in the flesh???"

Please show me where Joseph Smith (you can't even get his name right) ever denied the divinity of Jesus Christ. That Jesus Christ is both a god and a savior is central to the LDS faith. Your ignorance, and your hate, is stunning. You have nothing of Christ in you

The training in hate and bigotry you've received reminds me of the Wahabi sect and the prejudice, chauvinism and deceit that goes on in the Madrases. Anyway, don't waste your time replying. I stopped replying to your ignorant posts yesterday, but just had to respond to this one which was the absolute climax of your stupidity and ill-informed nature about what the LDS church teaches. Shame on you. Take stock of your life and look within yourself to find what made you so full of hate, bigotry and lies. And question why a preacher or pastor would teach hate and lies rather than building up your own faith. Christ wasn't about destruction or tearing down others. He was about building up. That is why I say you have nothing of Christ in you. Have a nice life. I have nothing more to say to you.
55 posted on 11/04/2005 9:36:37 AM PST by MikeA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss
Jam it down the throats of the press and the Liberals. They can no longer get away with LIES

This list has been out for at least two years...and I'm still waiting for Russert, et al to throw it in the faces of the left.....still waiting.

56 posted on 11/04/2005 9:43:43 AM PST by ErnBatavia (Like a midget at a urinal - stay on your toes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MikeA; All
Jesus Christ was not "A" God,He was God in the Flesh "ONE GOD" Father Son and Holy Spirit,"Triune"
If you don,t believe this you are deceived.

That,s why I pointed to John 20:28 and I see you have no answer.

Now you know the Truth.

I forgive you for your words towards me.You need to be careful when you accuse someone who has the Holy Spirit in them of not having Christ in them because your bordering on committing unpardonable sin.

I,m only trying to help you see the Truth.
Nothing I said to you was in hate whatsoever.
57 posted on 11/04/2005 12:22:42 PM PST by pro610 (Faith the size of a mustard seed can move mountains. Praise Jesus Christ!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: pro610
'The Catholic Church does not oppose Protestant,s from a Salvation viewpoint. You don,t know what your talking about."

I have been a Catholic for 56 years and I know what they teach. We could go into the fine print but I am not going to bother.

58 posted on 11/04/2005 5:54:42 PM PST by Hound of the Baskervilles (Liberals are unfit for citizenship in a country that values freedom and courage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Hound of the Baskervilles
Please accept my apology if I came off sounding harsh.
There have been a lot of recent changes in Catholic Church regarding Salvation and non Catholics.
Most importantly is the "Dominus Lesus" by then Cardinal Ratzinger in Aug 2000 and accepted by Pope JP as official Church stance on the issue.
In section VI it states
"For those who are not formally and visibly members of the Church Salvation in Christ is accessible by virtue of grace"
http://www.catholicculture.org/docs/doc_view.cfm?recnum=3022#VI

full document link
http://www.catholicculture.org/docs/doc_view.cfm?recnum=3022

Granted though the Church does realize there are dangers to ones salvation all other religions.
59 posted on 11/05/2005 5:40:02 AM PST by pro610 (Faith the size of a mustard seed can move mountains. Praise Jesus Christ!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: pro610
"Please accept my apology if I came off sounding harsh."

Sure! Not a problem. ;o>

Hey, you did read the fine print. That's what I call doing your homework. You might want to check out the encyclical Lumen Gentium. But first try this VERY interesting and brief explanation of the Catholic Church's' teaching on who can be saved. http://www.ewtn.com/library/SCRIPTUR/EXTRAECC.TXT

Hound

60 posted on 11/05/2005 5:11:22 PM PST by Hound of the Baskervilles (Liberals are unfit for citizenship in a country that values freedom and courage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson