 |
 |
 |
|
I would love to know how much Islamist money has been funneled into CNN |
Posted on 11/05/2005 11:34:11 AM PST by wagglebee
The Nov. 4 headline of the online version of Le Figaro, a leading French daily, translates as follows: "After a week of riots, the violence continues."
The next eight sub-headlines all refer to the riots as well. They all suggest just how serious a situation this is:
"Tonight: A bus depot and 400 cars destroyed."
"Cars burned and vandalized; city dwellers are exasperated."
"Firemen grow increasingly angry."
On this same day, none of the major left-leaning European English language media – the BBC, Guardian and Times in Britain and the Irish Times – chose to report on the frightening chaos in France, at least not on the front pages of their online publications.
Read carefully, the lead article in Figaro suggests the reason for this unwitting conspiracy of silence. It tells how more than 315 cars have been burned in the heart of Paris in the last two days. Bus service has been interrupted. A school has been torched, and police have been shot at. Nor has the violence been limited to Paris. Buildings have been burned in at least a dozen cities around the country.
In Figaro, all these accounts of violence are written in the passive voice. One must read more than two hundred words into the article before learning that there are actual émeutiers – rioters – causing the problem. The riots began a week earlier when two "adolescents" ran from the police who were checking identification papers. Although the police did not chase them, the two youths hid in an electrical power sub-station and electrocuted themselves. This, of course, has led not to a Darwin Award – that will come later – but to much official hand-wringing and investigations of the police as well as a week of madness throughout the nation.
As to the demographics of the two boys and the rioters, the unknowing reader is left without a clue for the first 700 words of the article, save for the fact that they represent part of a "more global, anti-institutional struggle."
The first reference to "musulmans" presents them not as the perpetrators of the violence, but rather as its victims. The article tells of how the explosion of a tear gas grenade in front of a mosque exacerbated the tensions.
"Someone attacked a mosque," the Figaro quotes a young Muslim as saying, "and do you think this ignoble act would pass without response?" Obviously not, although as Figaro notes, the circumstances of the attack remain unclear. One need not be a cynic or a racist to suspect an agent provocateur, a concept the French named, if not invented.
The fact that official France has cozied up to the dissident element in this global struggle has obviously bought it no reprieve. This seemingly unprovoked mayhem by their musulman friends has embarrassed the French media into awkward apologetics and the European media into silence. Observing them, one begins to understand how Hitler was allowed to prosper.
"France herself is being attacked by foreign hordes," claims the reliably outspoken Jean-Marie Le Pen at the end of the article. Indeed, in a continent of cowards and compromisers, it should not come as a surprise that citizens will turn to the first public figure who dares say anything at all.
Are they calling them insurgents or Freedom Fighters, yet?
True, so true. It's only fair.
(CNN was playing at the bank's monitos.)
And CNN's scrolling headline (while showing the fires and fighting) claims that "Damage was mostly limited to "immigrant" areas in Paris."
See?
Even the fair and balanced CNN isn't claiming ther were any Muslim rioters!
/sarchasm of truth
Absolutely. They'll need to know who it is that is calling the shots in their country from now on.
And fortunately, damage was confined to their own squalid neighborhoods (read L.A., Detroit, etc.)
I saw a story today where the AP described the rioters that Hugo Chavez was speaking to in Argentina yesterday as "peaceful." It's unbelievable what they get away with; but unfortunately, I think that a large percentage of the public is too ignorant to realize it.
| |
|
|
|
I would love to know how much Islamist money has been funneled into CNN |
Good question.. And where is Michael Moore in all this?
I wish someone would ask him what he thinks should be done. Michael's a philosophicator who enjoys chatting about world troubles while eating fine food. He's just like the French and the diplomats at the UN.
Islam, The Alleged Religion of Peace® ( TARP™ )? Click this picture:
No, I am not exaggerating. Click the pic, go to "last," and read backwards.
If you are not informed about this stuff, you will be made sick. If you are informed, you will be made mad, all over again.
Kindly note tagline...
Well remember the French took it from the Moors several hundred years ago.
I thought the US was the only "first-world" country with ghettos.
Heaven help us all if it has to be "reported" that "rioters" are actually "terrorists" incognito.
Oh, the humanity......
Quitely trying to unload all his Halliburton stock.. before Al Franken finds out and calls him a big fat hypocrite.. He does have his honor to think of.. you know..
the inner city ghettos, or
people w/ work ethic, etc. that would create the ghetto ?
"Even the fair and balanced CNN isn't claiming ther were any Muslim rioters! "
Apparently neither is Fox News and it's sister, Sky News.
In a way I think it might be better if news reports neglected to mention Muslims in the coverage. Think about it for a minute. Everything these animals do is to call attention to Islam. What better way to insult them than to treat them like ordinary hooligans?
You must have a higher level college degree.....
Liberalism will not survive this.
We will probably be treated to a John Kerry speech on the Senate floor first thing Monday AM.
There was an AP article about this in the South Florida Sun-Sentinel this morning. Buried halfway through the article was a "by-the-way" mention of Muslims.
Appeasement meets the 5 W's.
I just watched a French news clip that called them insurgents, but insurgents against what they didn't say.
bump
Muslims! I wasn't aware it was anything about muslims! why oh why has the BBC failed me! Sarcasm yo!....
I draw the line there. Anybody who gets as much easy sex as fireman shouldn't complain about their anger until a very high threshold is reached!
Fox News is a pale shadow of its former self. They'll be hiring Katie any day now.
Why is this surprising? The msm wouldn't want to "profile" after all. ;)
The mantra is: They're poor people who are just upset because they have been so abused and neglected.
So ... what else is new ..??
Although French newspapers and television networks usually do not say so, the majority of the perpetrators are of Arab and North African extraction,France Watches Warily As Violent Protests Mount Unemployment, Racial Issues Prompt Disorder By Anne Swardson Washington Post Foreign Service Saturday, January 3, 1998; Page A15
I'll be muting that, for sure.
No.
MANKIND (rather, "civilized mankind") will not survive this, unless the dominant Orwellian 1984 lies of "political correctness" are destroyed.
Liberalism will survive ONLY AS LONG AS THEY (liberals) CONTROL the mainstream political (and academic!) thought and press.
Hence, their (the international socialists') desperate efforts to "reign in" political speech and the Internet.
They surrendered in a RR car in WW2... maybe they'll do it in a mosque this time.
I think this unlikely. Islam contradicts human nature itself. If it were possible to overcome human nature, the communists would have figured out how to do so in the last century.
Liberalism also contradicts human nature, in many ways. On matters of the family, on matters of economics and human motivation, on transcendent matters like religion, Liberalism has nothing useful to say, offering only nonsense platitudes to fool the ignorant.
I have no doubt that Liberalism will transmute into something else during as islam is being de-fanged (or destroyed utterly, if that's they way they want it). That's because Liberalism (as I have observed before) is really just "philosophical entropy." It's just a fancy name for disordered thought. Liberalism is just the intellectual manifestation of the saying "s**t rolls downhill.
(steely)
LOL!....except you ended a sentence with a preposition...tsk, tsk.
Actually they are the epitome of "insurgents" compared to the terrorists in Iraq.
You have revealed the problem, the Muslim terrorists, gang bangers and thugs have not appointed a Grand Mullah for the Paris area, so the French don't have anyone to surrender to, and the terrorism continues.
I suggest the French beg the terrorist to appoint a Grand Mullah to decree and enforce Shariah law so the French could surrender and convert.
How's this:
The spineless Frogs deserve to know to whom they will be surrendering.
Anchorperson, Carol, acting as if this story is something new.
Actually, I like your original attempt much better! ;^)
Very true, They are only reclaiming what is rightfully theirs just like the Palis.
Immigrants? I heard one CNN report today that called it 'racial unrest'.......The MSM squirming over who, what, when & why it is happening@
http://www.historyofjihad.org/persia.html
What is Jihad: The Arabic word Jihad is derived from the root word Jahada (struggle). Jihad has come to mean an offensive war to be waged by Muslims against all non-Muslims to convert them to Islam on the pain of death. Jihad is enjoined on all Muslims by the Quran.
This site brings you the history of the Islamic Jihad from a neutral and factual viewpoint.
Site Map
The Jihad against Arabs (622 to 634)
The Jihad against Zoroastrian Persians of Iran, Baluchistan and Afghanistan (634 to 651)
The Jihad against the Byzantine Christians (634 to 1453)
The Jihad against Christian Coptic Egyptians (640 to 655)
The Jihad against Christian Coptic Nubians - modern Sudanese (650)
The Jihad against pagan Berbers - North Africans (650 to 700)
The Jihad against Spaniards (711 to 730)
The Reconquista against Jihad in Spain (730 to 1492)
The Jihad against Franks - modern French (720 to 732)
The Jihad against Sicilians in Italy (812 to 940)
The Jihad against Chinese (751)
The Jihad against Turks (651 to 751)
The Jihad against Armenians and Georgians (1071 to 1920)
The Crusade against Jihad (1096 – 1291 ongoing)
The Jihad against Mongols (1260 to 1300)
The Jihad against Hindus of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh (638 to 1857)
The Jihad against Indonesians and Malays (1450 to 1500)
The Jihad against Poland (1444 to 1699)
The Jihad against Rumania (1350 to 1699)
The Jihad against Russia (1500 to 1853)
The Jihad against Bulgaria (1350 to 1843)
The Jihad against Serbs, Croats and Albanians (1334 to 1920)
The Jihad against Greeks (1450 to 1853)
The Jihad against Albania (1332 - 1853)
The Jihad against Croatia (1389 to 1843)
The Jihad against Hungarians (1500 to 1683)
The Jihad against Austrians (1683)
Jihad in the Modern Age (20th and 21st Centuries)
The Jihad against Israelis (1948 – 2004 ongoing)
The Jihad against Americans (9/11/2001)
The Jihad against the British (1947 onwards)
The Jihad against the Germans (1945 onwards)
The Jihad against the Indians (1947 onwards)
The Jihad against the Filipinos in Mindanao(1970 onwards)
The Jihad against Indonesian Christians in Malaku and East Timor (1970 onwards)
The Jihad against Russians (1995 onwards)
The Jihad against Dutch and Belgians (2003 onwards)
The Jihad against Norwegians and Swedes (2003 onwards)
The Jihad against Thais (2003 onwards)
The Jihad against Nigerians (1965 onwards)
The Jihad against Canadians (2001 onwards)
The Jihad against Latin America (2003 onwards)
The Jihad against Australia (2002 onwards)
The Global Jihad today (2001 – ongoing)
The War on Terror against Jihad today (2001– ongoing)
I heard recently on the news that it's now been learned that the rioting is not sporadic and spontaneous but is being orchestrated. Perhaps Jacques Chirac and the French will learn that when a sunami of muslims from North Africa (estimated at 6 million, a significant percentage of France's population) is allowed to immigrate into your nation that the jihadists among them will do precisely what they're now doing. France might learn that their policy of appeasement (denouncing and opposing the Iraq war, etc.) will not succeed with the fanatics among them. In the Dec. '04 edition of Commentary, David Pryce-Jones had an article "The Islamization of Europe?" It describes a deplorable situation in the present and bleak prospects for the future. With a declining indigenous population European nations have imported vast hordes of muslims to clean their streets and do menial labor until their pension systems collapse. Of course it won't much bother a people who know they are headed for negative birthrate extinction. Maintaining a PC pretense about the true nature and extent of the rioting rather than decisively confronting the chaotic anarchy with force will only teach the Islamists that the infidels are weak and cowardly and they need only look for another pretext to instigate destruction and mayhem in the future. I must admit that I'm guilty of a little schadenfreud -- it couldn't have happened to a more smugly arrogant and hypocritical nation --- au revoir!!
More correctly, the French halted the Islamic invasion after it had overrun Spain (Iberia) when Charles Martel defeated them in the battle of Tours in 732. It wasn't until the late 15th century that Ferdinand and Isabella started to drive them from Spain. The Islamofascists still remember that. Their goal is still to follow Mohammed's example (who himself engaged in the slaughter of Arabs and Jews) and command to subdue the infidel.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
