[Coyoteman]

You raise several points in response to my post.

My primary theme was the scope of the theory of evolution. It does not deal with the origins of life, rather the changes which have occurred since those origins. However, you continue to bring up origins as a part of the theory of evolution. For example, you write the following (my responses in blue):

I do not understand why, on one hand, TOE advocates demand as an imperative the implication of accidental creation of life when teaching TOE

Evolution does not mention the creation of life

but object so strongly to mere mention of that implication's inadequacy at the same time?

Evolution does not mention the creation of life

Why do you respond so condescendingly to a valid objection to that approach to teaching TOE?

Because evolution does not mention the creation of life

I hope this helps to clarify things.

[Amish with an attitude]

Well stated.

This divergence between abiogenesis and evolution seems to be a relatively new idea.

[From many - one.]

:-)