Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trois arrestations pour incitation ŕ l'émeute sur "blog"
Reuters ^ | lundi 7 novembre 2005, 13h32 | Reuters

Posted on 11/07/2005 1:17:22 PM PST by Cplus

Edited on 11/07/2005 1:43:41 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

PARIS (Reuters) - Un mineur et deux jeunes majeurs soupçonnés d'avoir lancé sur internet des appels à l'émeute et à l'agression contre des policiers ont été arrêtés lundi à Aix-en-Provence et en région parisienne, apprend-on de source judiciaire.

Les trois "blogs" utilisés, des sites internet personnels, étaient hébergés sur le site de la radio Skyrock, qui les a désactivés durant le week-end.

"Les sites incitaient à participer aux mouvements généraux de violences urbaines et à attaquer des policiers et des commissariats", a déclaré à Reuters un magistrat du parquet de Paris.

Le parquet devait décider dans la journée de l'éventuelle ouverture d'une information judiciaire, une enquête étant jugée nécessaire pour déterminer les éventuelles attaches politiques des suspects et savoir si leur démarche procède ou non d'une entreprise organisée.

Les suspects encourront jusqu'à cinq ans de prison si la qualification pressentie pour les faits, "incitation à commettre des agressions contre des personnes", est retenue.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: france; insurgency; internet; intifada; jihad; paris; parisriots; quagmire; surrender; terrorism; uprising
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
The nanny state aims to censor the internet.

5 years in French prison (one of Europe's worst) for internet writings.

Is there anyone less tolerant of dissent than "liberals"?

1 posted on 11/07/2005 1:17:23 PM PST by Cplus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cplus
The nanny state aims to censor the internet.

Nice headline change.

And incitement to riot isn't protected free speech.

2 posted on 11/07/2005 1:19:28 PM PST by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cplus

Well now wait just a minute. I can't have a website here in America that says to attack cops, especially if a riot is already underway. I really just don't think this is a free speech issue, even by our own standards.


3 posted on 11/07/2005 1:19:28 PM PST by domenad (In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cplus

"the sites encouraged to take part in the general movements of urban violences and to attack police officers and police stations",
---

If they would have called for the attacks to be US police officers, everything would be fine.

Liberals as usual, can say whatever you want, as long as we ok it.


4 posted on 11/07/2005 1:20:44 PM PST by downtoliberalism ("A coalition partner must do more than just express sympathy, a coalition partner must perform,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cplus
Bablefish translation of actual headline:

hree arrests for incentive with the riot on "blog"

Even Reuters wouldn't be as blatant with their headline as your change was. And that's saying something.

5 posted on 11/07/2005 1:21:12 PM PST by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cplus

"the sites encouraged to take part in the general movements of urban violences and to attack police officers and police stations",

*****

Could it be we're trying not to use the "M" word here? Sounds like content was provided courtesy of TROP.


6 posted on 11/07/2005 1:21:14 PM PST by timsbella (Mark Steyn for Prime Minister of Canada!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cplus
Is there anyone less tolerant of dissent than "liberals"?

I hear North Korea has a slightly harsher punishment. A bullet.

7 posted on 11/07/2005 1:22:03 PM PST by theDentist (The Dems have put all their eggs in one basket-case: Howard "Belltower" Dean.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cplus

Censorship? F***, this is about protecting society from those who openly seek to destroy it. Hope they shoot these bastards....


8 posted on 11/07/2005 1:22:03 PM PST by freebilly (Go USF Baseball!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
"the sites encouraged to take part in the general movements of urban violences and to attack police officers and police stations", in Reuters a magistrate of Paris declared.

I don't blame them. It is suggesting they break the law.

"And incitement to riot isn't protected free speech."

Agree!

Only an imbecile would see this as a "violation" of their "free speech". With "free speech" there comes responsibility.
9 posted on 11/07/2005 1:22:32 PM PST by nmh (Intelligent people believe in Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cplus

Inciting a riot is not free speech. I hope they send these "free speech" advocates to jail for a long time.


10 posted on 11/07/2005 1:23:11 PM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cplus

Perhaps DU would suit you better?


Cplus
Since Oct 10, 2005


11 posted on 11/07/2005 1:23:12 PM PST by nmh (Intelligent people believe in Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cplus
The nanny state aims to censor the internet. 5 years in French prison (one of Europe's worst) for internet writings. Is there anyone less tolerant of dissent than "liberals"?

The sites were apparently inciting people to violence and attacks on police. Hardly reason to be incensed about a violation of dissenting free speech rights.

12 posted on 11/07/2005 1:23:17 PM PST by AHerald ("Take heart; rise, he is calling you." Mark 10:49)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cplus
The computer suspects will incur up to five years of prison

Meanwhile, thousands in the streets burn France.

13 posted on 11/07/2005 1:23:41 PM PST by Black Tooth (The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cplus

Trois arrestations pour incitation à l'émeute sur "blog"

You may also want to brush up on your French for a proper translation.


14 posted on 11/07/2005 1:24:24 PM PST by nmh (Intelligent people believe in Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh

We have a troll!


15 posted on 11/07/2005 1:24:38 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nmh

Ok so let me get this right. Paris is burning to the ground, crazy Muslims are taking over, but by George we gotta arrest those durn bloggers!!! Glad to see we have our priorities straight here!!

Gees!!


16 posted on 11/07/2005 1:25:02 PM PST by murrie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cplus; Admin Moderator

The correct title is:

"Trois arrestations pour incitation à l'émeute sur "blog" "

which translated is:

"Three arrested for incitement to riot, in their blogs".

It's a little different than claiming their free speech rights were violated.


17 posted on 11/07/2005 1:25:47 PM PST by Pragmatic_View
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borax Queen

I don't see the word "Muslims" on this report....do you?


18 posted on 11/07/2005 1:25:48 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Yup ... a typical imbecile.

He thinks we're as stupid as he is. LOL!


19 posted on 11/07/2005 1:25:56 PM PST by nmh (Intelligent people believe in Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cplus

Are you a troll or just confused about the difference between inciting violence and public discourse?


20 posted on 11/07/2005 1:26:25 PM PST by NonValueAdded ("To the terrorists, the media is a vital force multiplier" Brig. Gen. Donald Alston (USAF) 10/31/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson