Skip to comments.
Trois arrestations pour incitation à l'émeute sur "blog"
Reuters ^
| lundi 7 novembre 2005, 13h32
| Reuters
Posted on 11/07/2005 1:17:22 PM PST by Cplus
Edited on 11/07/2005 1:43:41 PM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
The nanny state aims to censor the internet.
5 years in French prison (one of Europe's worst) for internet writings.
Is there anyone less tolerant of dissent than "liberals"?
1
posted on
11/07/2005 1:17:23 PM PST
by
Cplus
To: Cplus
The nanny state aims to censor the internet. Nice headline change.
And incitement to riot isn't protected free speech.
2
posted on
11/07/2005 1:19:28 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Drool overflowed my buffer...)
To: Cplus
Well now wait just a minute. I can't have a website here in America that says to attack cops, especially if a riot is already underway. I really just don't think this is a free speech issue, even by our own standards.
3
posted on
11/07/2005 1:19:28 PM PST
by
domenad
(In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
To: Cplus
"the sites encouraged to take part in the general movements of urban violences and to attack police officers and police stations",
---
If they would have called for the attacks to be US police officers, everything would be fine.
Liberals as usual, can say whatever you want, as long as we ok it.
4
posted on
11/07/2005 1:20:44 PM PST
by
downtoliberalism
("A coalition partner must do more than just express sympathy, a coalition partner must perform,")
To: Cplus
Bablefish translation of actual headline:
hree arrests for incentive with the riot on "blog"
Even Reuters wouldn't be as blatant with their headline as your change was. And that's saying something.
5
posted on
11/07/2005 1:21:12 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Drool overflowed my buffer...)
To: Cplus
"the sites encouraged to take part in the general movements of urban violences and to attack police officers and police stations",
*****
Could it be we're trying not to use the "M" word here? Sounds like content was provided courtesy of TROP.
6
posted on
11/07/2005 1:21:14 PM PST
by
timsbella
(Mark Steyn for Prime Minister of Canada!)
To: Cplus
Is there anyone less tolerant of dissent than "liberals"? I hear North Korea has a slightly harsher punishment. A bullet.
7
posted on
11/07/2005 1:22:03 PM PST
by
theDentist
(The Dems have put all their eggs in one basket-case: Howard "Belltower" Dean.)
To: Cplus
Censorship? F***, this is about protecting society from those who openly seek to destroy it. Hope they shoot these bastards....
8
posted on
11/07/2005 1:22:03 PM PST
by
freebilly
(Go USF Baseball!)
To: dirtboy
"the sites encouraged to take part in the general movements of urban violences and to attack police officers and police stations", in Reuters a magistrate of Paris declared.
I don't blame them. It is suggesting they break the law.
"And incitement to riot isn't protected free speech."
Agree!
Only an imbecile would see this as a "violation" of their "free speech". With "free speech" there comes responsibility.
9
posted on
11/07/2005 1:22:32 PM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people believe in Intelligent Design (God).)
To: Cplus
Inciting a riot is not free speech. I hope they send these "free speech" advocates to jail for a long time.
To: Cplus
Perhaps DU would suit you better?
Cplus
Since Oct 10, 2005
11
posted on
11/07/2005 1:23:12 PM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people believe in Intelligent Design (God).)
To: Cplus
The nanny state aims to censor the internet. 5 years in French prison (one of Europe's worst) for internet writings. Is there anyone less tolerant of dissent than "liberals"? The sites were apparently inciting people to violence and attacks on police. Hardly reason to be incensed about a violation of dissenting free speech rights.
12
posted on
11/07/2005 1:23:17 PM PST
by
AHerald
("Take heart; rise, he is calling you." Mark 10:49)
To: Cplus
The computer suspects will incur up to five years of prisonMeanwhile, thousands in the streets burn France.
13
posted on
11/07/2005 1:23:41 PM PST
by
Black Tooth
(The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
To: Cplus
Trois arrestations pour incitation à l'émeute sur "blog"
You may also want to brush up on your French for a proper translation.
14
posted on
11/07/2005 1:24:24 PM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people believe in Intelligent Design (God).)
To: nmh
15
posted on
11/07/2005 1:24:38 PM PST
by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: nmh
Ok so let me get this right. Paris is burning to the ground, crazy Muslims are taking over, but by George we gotta arrest those durn bloggers!!! Glad to see we have our priorities straight here!!
Gees!!
16
posted on
11/07/2005 1:25:02 PM PST
by
murrie
To: Cplus; Admin Moderator
The correct title is:
"Trois arrestations pour incitation à l'émeute sur "blog" "
which translated is:
"Three arrested for incitement to riot, in their blogs".
It's a little different than claiming their free speech rights were violated.
To: Borax Queen
I don't see the word "Muslims" on this report....do you?
18
posted on
11/07/2005 1:25:48 PM PST
by
nicmarlo
To: ncountylee
Yup ... a typical imbecile.
He thinks we're as stupid as he is. LOL!
19
posted on
11/07/2005 1:25:56 PM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people believe in Intelligent Design (God).)
To: Cplus
Are you a troll or just confused about the difference between inciting violence and public discourse?
20
posted on
11/07/2005 1:26:25 PM PST
by
NonValueAdded
("To the terrorists, the media is a vital force multiplier" Brig. Gen. Donald Alston (USAF) 10/31/05)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson