Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Here's Miller's farewell apologia... Not much new that I can see - apparently a confirmation that she was threatened with felony obstruction charges, and the admission that she went to jail to dramatize the need for a Federal Shield law seems to be new news (and is probably an afterthought, another weak attempt to make herself a martyr for the 'profession' in order to rehabilitate herself in the eyes of her peers). Perhaps her web site (or a future book deal?) may shed some more light on all of the unanswered questions, but the tone of this tear-drenched letter to the editor makes that somewhat doubtful.
1 posted on 11/09/2005 9:13:36 PM PST by Zeppo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Zeppo

Reporters who become the news are not reporters.


2 posted on 11/09/2005 9:18:50 PM PST by SteveMcKing ("I was born a Democrat. I expect I'll be a Democrat the day I leave this earth." -Zell Miller '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zeppo

Just read the responses on her website. They are very good, and she nails Maureen Dowd on some mistakes that she made in her column. Good read.


3 posted on 11/09/2005 9:19:16 PM PST by SC33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zeppo

It's sad to see the New York Times lose a couple of their best writers recently - William Safire and Judith Miller. But they still have John F. Burns and John Markoff.


7 posted on 11/09/2005 9:35:32 PM PST by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zeppo
Talk about a self-aggrandizing, ego maniacal, martyr complex! Her actions and experiences with the judicial system are enough to convince me a reporter's shield law would be one of the STUPIDEST things we could do!

After hearing Mary Mapes'explain that she didn't think reporters should have to vet their sources before they do a story, I have nightmares about what they would report fallaciously. Hoping, of course, that no one would take the time or trouble to determine the actual truth.
8 posted on 11/09/2005 9:51:01 PM PST by singfreedom ("Victory at all costs,.......for without victory there is no survival."--Churchill--that's "Winston")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zeppo

Judy is truly a tragic figure- perhaps she can prevail against the foggy mist of fatal uncertainty. Then again- maybe the hell- NOT. Willy Shakethesphere has told this story, yet again.


9 posted on 11/09/2005 9:58:47 PM PST by Treader (Hillary's dark smile is reminiscent of Stalin's inhuman grin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zeppo

But .. the "confidential source" she was protecting WAS NOT LIBBY!!


10 posted on 11/09/2005 10:11:18 PM PST by CyberAnt ( I believe in Congressman Curt Weldon re Able Danger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zeppo
a deliberate effort to obstruct the prosecutor's inquiry into serious crimes.

An unbiased reporter would have said "potential" serious crimes. Or "if serious crimes were committed."
13 posted on 11/09/2005 10:18:01 PM PST by msnimje ("People for the American Way have issued a Fatwah against Alito" --- John Cornyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zeppo

I went to her website and read her letter to Maureen Dowd. It was hoping she would respond to maureen saying she slept her way to the top but she didn't.


14 posted on 11/09/2005 10:24:42 PM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zeppo

still think shes spooked up


16 posted on 11/09/2005 11:12:21 PM PST by wildcatf4f3 (admittedly too unstable for public office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

later


18 posted on 11/09/2005 11:40:20 PM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zeppo
Though 49 states have extended this privilege to journalists ... there is no comparable federal law.

Sorry. See ya. Ciao. Ta-Ta.
Hey Hey Hey, Good Bye!

19 posted on 11/09/2005 11:52:08 PM PST by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zeppo

I'm unhappy about Miller leaving the NYT only because she irritated so many there,


20 posted on 11/10/2005 2:49:29 AM PST by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zeppo

Now that we apparently know that there was no "there" there, I'm wondering why Miller's lawyers don't seek some kind of sanction on Fitzgerald for falsely claiming that Miller was obstructing justice (and holding her in jail for contempt). If there was no underlying 'foul' of outing a covert agent or illegally transmitting classified information (on ship movements, for example), then it would seem to be a mighty weak basis for jailing Miller in order to find out whether or not Libby was being truthful on questions that were only tangentially related to the original mandate of the prosecutor.


25 posted on 11/10/2005 7:59:13 AM PST by Zeppo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zeppo

Leaving the NY Times is like getting a lifeboat seat on the Titanic.


27 posted on 11/10/2005 2:40:10 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zeppo

if we knew the truth about the 2nd "condition" - what Fitzgerald let her get away with keeping secret.


29 posted on 11/10/2005 6:52:15 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zeppo

she's on larry king now


32 posted on 11/10/2005 6:56:22 PM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson