Posted on 11/10/2005 9:22:52 PM PST by smoothsailing
'Hollywood: Rotten To The Corps'
By Oliver North
November 11, 2005
SAN ANTONIO, TX -- The 230th Anniversary of the founding of the U.S. Marine Corps. Nov. 11th -- Veterans' Day. Lance Corporal Aaron Mankin, U.S.M.C., observed both celebrations from Brooke Army Medical Center here in San Antonio. He's been here for months -- recovering from burns and wounds he received earlier this year near Al Qaim, Iraq. I was there, covering his unit for FOX News when the Assault Amphibious Vehicle he was in was blown apart by an improvised explosive device. This week, I was privileged to spend part of this year's Marine Corps anniversary with him here in San Antonio. It would have been nice to have introduced him to some of the fools in Hollywood.
It's pretty clear that those making movies in Tinsel Town don't know any real men like Aaron Mankin. They apparently prefer cowardice over courage; witless whiners to real patriots; gutless wimps and hollow phonies to men who know the meaning of self-sacrifice and integrity. That's the only conclusion one can draw after seeing Hollywood's latest anti-military travesty -- "Jarhead."
The newly-released film is loosely based on an anti-Marine screed crafted by Anthony Swofford, who purports to be a "veteran" of Desert Shield and Desert Storm in 1990 and 1991. Mr. Swofford maintains it is an accurate depiction of his military experience, from boot camp -- where he claims to have been abused and belittled by a maniacal drill instructor -- to his mutinous "tour of duty" in Saudi Arabia during the first Gulf War.
"A witty, profane, down-in-the-sand account of the war many only know from CNN, this former sniper's debut is a worthy addition to the battlefield memoir genre," says a book review by Publisher's Weekly. But this is no "Battle Cry" -- by Leon Uris -- a real battle memoir by a real Marine. The plug for CNN could easily have read, "ABC," "CBS" or "NBC" -- for all the so-called mainstream media have covered war and warriors with equal disdain. And just in case the reader is dense enough to misunderstand what the work is really about, the reviewer helpfully notes that Mr. Swofford "questions whether the men are as prepared as their commanders, the American public and the men themselves think they are."
One might conclude from the book and movie reviews that this is simply another anti-war epic. But this isn't "Red Badge of Courage," or "All Quiet on the Western Front" -- two great books and films that accurately depict the horror and carnage of war. Nor does "Jarhead" contain any of the cutting, satirical humor of "M.A.S.H." or "Catch-22" -- both of which portray war's futility.
It's not that Hollywood has always failed those who fight our wars. During and after World War II, every studio produced films that encouraged a war-weary nation -- and showed American soldiers, sailors, airmen, Guardsmen and Marines as committed, courageous and compassionate. But that was the "good war" -- and as the fictional "Saving Private Ryan" proved -- both in critical acclaim and at the box office -- decades after it ended, Hollywood remains comfortable making movies about the great crusade against fascism.
But clearly, "winning" a war isn't a prerequisite for a positive portrayal on the silver screen. Though the Korean War ended in stalemate -- the first war we didn't "win" -- filmmakers were still able to show the Americans who fought there in a positive way. "The Bridges of Toko-Ri" -- based on James A. Michener's novel -- has a tragic ending like the war in which it was set -- but it is still a saga of bravery and self-sacrifice.
Even the much-maligned Vietnam War has a small handful of films accurately depicting the valor and perseverance of those who served there. "We Were Soldiers Once," based on the account of General Harold Moore and reporter Joe Galloway on the events of Nov. 14 through 16, 1965, when 450 U.S. soldiers were airlifted into Ia Drang Valley and immediately surrounded by elements of the North Vietnamese Army's 66th Regiment is an example.
Other "losing campaigns" have been chronicled by cameras without denigrating those who served. The magnificent film, "Black Hawk Down" -- depicting the true-life story of Rangers and Army Delta Force operators who were sent on a disastrous raid into the heart of Mogadishu, Somalia, to capture warlord Mohamed Farrah Aidid, is a case in point.
Given these profitable precedents, why do the power brokers and financial geniuses in Hollywood choose to make a movie such as "Jarhead" and release it coincident with a Marine Corps birthday and Veterans' Day? The film has absolutely not one character or scene containing any redeeming virtue or value. It is an excessively vulgar movie without a moral or a point. With our nation at war this film is not just anti-war or rotten to the Corps -- though it is certainly that -- "Jarhead" is anti-everything that is good and decent.
During a week when Americans honor the Corps and thank their veterans, "Jarhead" cheapens and distorts the heroism, warrior spirit, superior intellect and selflessness of America's fighting forces. Those who participated in making this nihilist flop deserve nothing but scorn in return.
----------
COPYRIGHT 2005 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.
--------------------
Note -- The opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, and/or philosophy of GOPUSA.
BUMP and PING
I was wondering how Hollywood would choose to pervert our military in this new film. Thanks, Ollie, you answered my question.
>>>Note -- The opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, and/or philosophy of GOPUSA.<<<
That's too bad. In this case, they damn well ought to...
I believe Dale Dye is in the movie. He has been in several war pictures including Band of Brothers - as the Col of the 101th, I believe. I've lost a lot of respect for this former service member turned actor.
It's their standard disclaimor for every article they publish.
"The IMDB credits list for Jarhead does not include Dale Dye."
Damned glad to hear it.
How about Band of Brothers?
That's the reason I posted the column. I hope no one goes to see the damn thing.Screw hollyweird.
Excellent article.
OORAH bump for morning reading.
Big OOOOOH RAAAAAAH
So Ollie, tell us whatcha really think.....
Semper Fi, Brothers
USMC 1977 to 1981
I saw this movie about 4 days ago
what a waste
While we did do some of the things done in this movie, these are the things that we didn't tell our mother about.
They are the things we are ashamed of.
For Swoffard to make a movie based on his sick memories of his personal perversions is sinking to a new low.
Yes, the language is sometimes accurate, but most of it to me is totally out of reality and does not reflect what I remember at all, especially how we spoke to Staff NCO's. Or LtCol's like he did in the last combat scene.
For him to make the movie he did shows he never had Esprit de Corps, all he had is graduation from boot camp.
And no one cares about how hard boot camp is, Stanley Kubrik's FULL METAL JACKET cannot be improved upon, only copied cheaply even by genuine Drill Instructer veterans.
Dale Dye is NOT in JARHEAD
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.