Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Leaks are coming at the same pace they did before the 2004 election. What gives? Looks like some of the Dem sympathizers at the CIA woke up and realized that the story is back in the news again and started leaking.
1 posted on 11/10/2005 10:35:48 PM PST by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: indianrightwinger

STOP THE SENATE!!! I WANT AN INVESTIGATION!!!


2 posted on 11/10/2005 10:37:13 PM PST by No Longer Free State (No event has just one cause, no person has just one motive, no action has just the intended effect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger
What gives?

They can get away with it, that's what gives. Bush's refusal to hold rats accountable is his, and perhaps our downfall.

3 posted on 11/10/2005 10:38:27 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (Peace Begins in the Womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger

Hope Gross has the "box" smoking from use.


4 posted on 11/10/2005 10:39:10 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger
JANUARY 1999 : (LEAKS & THE DRIPS WHO MAKE THEM : BETRAYING THE COX COMMITTEE'S TRUST, SANDY BERGER ISSUES SPINNED STATEMENT ON WHAT WAS STILL A CLASSIFIED DOCUMENT CONCERNING THE TRANSFER OF HIGH TECH SECRETS TO CHINA - See PROLIFERATION) As a member of the Cox Committee charged with investigating the transfer of high-tech secrets to China during the Clinton administration, in January 1999 Rep. Weldon sent an advance copy of the committee's report to Mr. Berger for his review. After seven months of closed-door, bipartisan hearings with no leaks to the press, the committee of five Republicans and four Democrats had unanimously recommended some three dozen steps that should be taken to protect America's national security. Within days, however, "Sandy Berger issued a statement to selected members of the media putting the White House spin on what was still a classified document," congressman Weldon recalled. "He did that without asking any member of the committee. Before the CIA director could even read our report, Berger was already spinning. That sets the pattern for what may have occurred" in the Archives case, Rep. Weldon believes. --------- via 396 posted on 01/12/2005 6:51:18 PM PST by hoosiermama
5 posted on 11/10/2005 10:41:32 PM PST by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger

Bookmark


6 posted on 11/10/2005 10:44:14 PM PST by Manic_Episode (Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger

bump


7 posted on 11/10/2005 10:44:56 PM PST by Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger
These coincidental leaks really open one's eyes as to how manipulated we were by the MSM and the gubmint back in the day.

The Net has really blown the lid of the entire orchestrated gubmint/media game to manipulate public opinion.

8 posted on 11/10/2005 10:45:25 PM PST by zarf (It looks just like a Telefunken U-47!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger

"Dems + CIA Conspiring and Colluding + "document obtained by CNN was provided recently to Democrats on the Senate Intelligence Committee"


So we have the dems, the CIA and the media colluding and conspiring to bring down a SITTING PRESIDENT.

These dems are way out of line, and overboard. The repubs better get their act together and find out who in the Senate is leaking to the media.


9 posted on 11/10/2005 11:14:32 PM PST by CyberAnt ( I believe in Congressman Curt Weldon re Able Danger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger
Call me crazy but this CNN article makes no sense at all. Apparently CNN gets hold of a CIA report of a claim that originated in 2002 with a captured AQ operative. Key here is 2002. CNN goes on to report that DIA doubted the sources credibility in 2002 (well gee, why would they do that. We all know that muslims are sworn to uphold and tell the truth at all times. The Koran says so). Again, 2002. The Rat senator Levin, claims the administration used faulty intelligence as prerequisite for the Iraq invasion in March 2003. On this particular piece of intelligence, in hind sight, Levin has a point but how was the administration to know that? The source didn't recant until 2004 according to this CNN article! Then it get's even weirder. CNN writes "In February 2003, al-Libi, a senior military trainer for al Qaeda in Afghanistan, claimed the terrorist network "sent operatives to Iraq" to acquire weapons. So this source reports this intelligence in February 2003. His claim was reported in a CIA paper seven months later entitled, "Iraqi Support for Terrorism." Now they are saying the AQ source reported this claim in February 2003. 2003? What happened to 2002? But even better, if the source claimed this piece of intelligence in February of 2003 and the CIA paper titled "Iraqi Support for Terrorism" came out seven months later to make that September 2003, then just how could the administration have used this intelligence for justification to invade Iraq in March 2003? In the next paragraph, CNN writes: "The January 2003 updated version of the report added a key point: "That the detainee was not in a position to know if any training had taken place." What???? How can a report released seven months after Feb 2003 have a January 2003 updated version? Either I am confused or I really need sleep. This article just makes no sense to me.
10 posted on 11/10/2005 11:19:07 PM PST by Wolfhound777 (It's not our job to forgive them. Only God can do that. Our job is to arrange the meeting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger

But, Senator Global Test is on the Senate Intelligence Committee, and he supported regime change... before he was against it.


15 posted on 11/10/2005 11:45:26 PM PST by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger
So when it comes to chemical or biological attacks on the United States, it's always best to do nothing and wait and see?

I suspect the left is just sick that we haven't been attacked again.

19 posted on 11/11/2005 3:19:07 AM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger
This is yet another attempt to conjure up a scandal against Bush. As with the other attempts, it will ignore the facts and attempt to (neurolinguistically ) program the public by repeating the charges over and over until the masses think it is factual. This is how they planned to fight the Republicans. It was what they stated they were going to do in the memo that the Republican staffers were fired for copying off a non-secure portion of the Senate servers and leaking to the press, where it died when the MSM made a bigger deal of the taking action (leaking) than they did of the conspiracy that it detailed.

The fact about these intelligence reports that will be leaked selectively by the Democrats and their moles in the CIA is that the President never gets reports at that level. He does not have the time. He gets intelligence estimates from the Director of the CIA and bases his decisions on those summations. George Tenent is on record regarding intelligence about the situation in Iraq. Leaking in-house non-supporting reports and saying that a mistake was made is a form of Monday-morning quarterbacking in the third quarter.
21 posted on 11/11/2005 3:35:13 AM PST by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger

What do they mean faulty intel on WMD's and Iraqi ties? I think the case was proven on what was found post war... The dummies try to re-define the word stockpile but any of the below documented finds would kill thousands of US citizens if it was smuggled into the US by terrorists... hmmmmm

Found: 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium

• Found: 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons

• Found: Roadside bomb loaded with sarin gas

• Found: 1,000 radioactive materials--ideal for radioactive dirty bombs

• Found: 17 chemical warheads--some containing cyclosarin, a nerve agent five times more powerful than sarin


22 posted on 11/11/2005 3:43:33 AM PST by tomnbeverly ("Our Military are fighting terrorists in Iraq, so we do not have to face them here at home")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger

Of course he wouldn't know if the training actually went forward if we wasn't on site to see it.

However, that wouldn't necessarily contradict his previous statements that Al-Queda sent operatives to Iraq to learn the secrets of WMD production from the foremost Arab practitioner, Iraq.


24 posted on 11/11/2005 10:29:16 AM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson