Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defense Attorney's Closing Argument in Dover Evolution Trial
National Center for Science Education ^ | 16 November 2005 | Patrick Gillen, Esq.

Posted on 11/16/2005 2:38:35 PM PST by PatrickHenry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-168 next last
To: connectthedots; jennyp
"In the late 60s, Darwinian evolution based textbook for 9th Grade biology, said life arose from a 'primordial soup' and that the environmental conditions, like lightening etc, combined with whatever in the oceans formed the ingrediantd for the origin of life. Even remember seeing a film strip on the subject."

Was the textbook only about evolution or did it cover all sorts of theories in biology? Like maybe...ABIOGENESIS??? Isn't it possible that the book dealt with theories that weren't evolution? The biology textbook I had in High School had a little chapter at the end that dealt with theories about origins; origins of life (abiogenesis) and origins of species (evolution). They were considered separately, as was proper.
81 posted on 11/17/2005 12:27:23 AM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman

Those who accept the notion of universal common descent claim that all life forms have descended for single cell organisms. Those single cell organisms had to have had some origin. That origin, at least as hypothesized back then was what people would call abiogenesis today.


82 posted on 11/17/2005 12:42:23 AM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
What is the Theory of Evolution? Common usage of the word "evolution" is the idea that living things in our world have come into being through unguided naturalistic processes starting from a primeval mass of subatomic particles and radiation, over approximately 20 billion years.

Sounds to me like evolution is trying to explain a beginning here. I say trying because it is just a guess. Can't prove it by science anymore than science can prove that man has evolved from "primeval mass of subatomic particles and radiation". I thought radiation is known to kill not grow.

83 posted on 11/17/2005 12:42:58 AM PST by taxesareforever (Government is running amuck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots

"Those single cell organisms had to have had some origin. That origin, at least as hypothesized back then was what people would call abiogenesis today."

And it never was a part of the ToE.


84 posted on 11/17/2005 12:44:44 AM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever

What is this?

"What is the Theory of Evolution? Common usage of the word "evolution" is the idea that living things in our world have come into being through unguided naturalistic processes starting from a primeval mass of subatomic particles and radiation, over approximately 20 billion years."

I never said this, yet you made it look like it was my quote.
I knew you were dishonest when you promoted slavery on an earlier thread then denied it, but I didn't realize you made things up and tried to pass them off as the creation of someone you were debating. You are a shameless liar.


85 posted on 11/17/2005 12:50:38 AM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever
I thought radiation is known to kill not grow.

Disconnect your computer, radio, and TV. Stay out of the sun. Remove the lava rocks from your garden and aquariums.

All sources of "radiation".

86 posted on 11/17/2005 12:52:49 AM PST by dread78645 (Sorry Mr. Franklin, We couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: dread78645

Go stand next to an irradiated fuel cell and tell me if you will grow or die. Naw, forget it. You wouldn't be able to tell me.


87 posted on 11/17/2005 1:12:12 AM PST by taxesareforever (Government is running amuck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman

Sorry if I made it look like your quote. I didn't mean it that way. However this is a stated definition of evolution and it appears that it has hit a hard spot with you since it upset you so bad that you couldn't respond to it.


88 posted on 11/17/2005 1:14:17 AM PST by taxesareforever (Government is running amuck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
I knew you were dishonest when you promoted slavery on an earlier thread

Tell me, was slavery a product of evolution?

89 posted on 11/17/2005 1:16:12 AM PST by taxesareforever (Government is running amuck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: All
For those who missed in in a thread last week, here's the closing argument of the plaintiffs, from a handy page posted by Talk.Origins, which links all the transcripts:

Trial transcript: Day 21 (November 4), PM Session, Part 2 (Plaintiff's closing).

90 posted on 11/17/2005 3:23:57 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Expect no response if you're a troll, lunatic, retard, or incurable ignoramus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: All
Thanks to recent suggestions, the Evolution Troll's Toolkit has been updated to add yet another row to the grid. There are two available cells, waiting for classic creationist arguments. With 13 rows, it seems appropriate to freeze the size, so anything that gets in after the last two open items will have to replace something that's already in the grid. Survival of the fittest.
91 posted on 11/17/2005 3:39:07 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Expect no response if you're a troll, lunatic, retard, or incurable ignoramus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: curiosity; PatrickHenry
It's hard to argue any of the above things don't have the primary effect of advancing religion.

Actually the argument is that they indeed do not advance religion since it's only Ceremonial Deism which is not unconstitutional.

92 posted on 11/17/2005 3:44:13 AM PST by BMCDA (Whereof we cannot speak, thereof we must be silent. -- L. Wittgenstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: BMCDA
Actually the argument is that they indeed do not advance religion since it's only Ceremonial Deism which is not unconstitutional.

Which is a bunch of BS, IMHO. It's a way of violating the First Amendment, but pretending it doesn't because the politicians (be they Legislators or Judges) don't want to upset the religious nutballs who'll howl and scream...

93 posted on 11/17/2005 4:35:29 AM PST by WildHorseCrash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
That is really no different than any other extended trial. all the witnesses had been deposed and everyone knew in advance pretty much what the testimony would be.

Except when one side commits perjury during deposition and gets called on it at the trial.

94 posted on 11/17/2005 4:46:15 AM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
You're overlooking the contribution to Western Civilization made by the invention of the chastity belt.
The invention of the skeleton key?
95 posted on 11/17/2005 5:00:20 AM PST by anguish (while science catches up.... mysticism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
After all, Bill Gates is a college drop out. He didn't make it past his first year of college.

Add this to your list of easily researched falsehoods.

96 posted on 11/17/2005 5:02:29 AM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: anguish

... or perhaps picklock is a better term. More coffee needed.


97 posted on 11/17/2005 5:03:46 AM PST by anguish (while science catches up.... mysticism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

"What other kind of "supernatural causation" do they have in mind?"

Well, if you're a Born-Again Cargo-Cultist, there's the possibility that the Universe fell out of the cargo hold of The Great C-47...


98 posted on 11/17/2005 5:07:22 AM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse (MORE COWBELL! MORE COWBELL! (CLANK-CLANK-CLANK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
Can any of you creationists show me ONE breakthrough theory in science that has EVER been successful, that relied on the existence of the supernatural???

These enjoyed great commercial success.

99 posted on 11/17/2005 5:14:17 AM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
If a state gives its employees a day off for Christmas, that would technically be a problem under Lemon

More and more employers are offering a monthly day off, the exact date to be decided by the employee. Purely national hollidays like the Fourth and Thanksgiving are the exception.

100 posted on 11/17/2005 5:21:44 AM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson