More news on the demise of the ToM (Tired old Media)
1 posted on
11/20/2005 2:53:56 PM PST by
abb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: abb
The OSM (old stream media) is history (liberal print rags) and they know it.
To: abb; Landru; ForGod'sSake; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Copernicus; Mr. Mulliner; thesummerwind; ...
Well FReepers..... put your money where your mouth is.
How much can we raise to buy Knight Ridder?
3 posted on
11/20/2005 2:57:09 PM PST by
bert
(K.E. ; N.P . Remember the Maine, Remember the Alamo..... Remember Murtha)
To: abb
"ToM (Tired old Media)"
I LIKE it!
4 posted on
11/20/2005 2:58:00 PM PST by
hsalaw
To: abb
Was going to pick up a Sunday Chicago Trib today because all the Christmas sale papers are in it, I think, if I remember right. Haven't gotten a paper for a zillion years. My 8 year old daughters says "what's in a newspaper mom?"
6 posted on
11/20/2005 3:01:44 PM PST by
Esther Ruth
(I have loved thee with an EVERLASTING LOVE, Jeremiah 31:3 Genesis 12:1-3 ***ZECH 12:3)
To: abb
Well, somebody needs to buy it!
What will we do for fish wrap? And how will we line the bottoms of birdcages?
This could be tragic!!!!
8 posted on
11/20/2005 3:03:32 PM PST by
TomGuy
To: abb
You just can't trust what the m.s.m says. Add to that you are led by the nose by liberal anti bush anti American writers pushing the gay&lesbian,prochoice,antimilitary,crap.
So you just don't purchase the Times or Post or the local little town rag anymore.
9 posted on
11/20/2005 3:03:44 PM PST by
Joe Boucher
(an enemy of islam)
To: abb
11 posted on
11/20/2005 3:06:19 PM PST by
frankjr
To: abb
With high-speed broadband and wireless access now a fact for most Americans, consumers are no longer at the mercy of second-rate information providers...More news on the demise of the ToM (Tired old Media :)
ToM is the right description of The Lexington Hearld-(mis)Leader, It isn't worth a Tinkers' D@mn.
13 posted on
11/20/2005 3:16:43 PM PST by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
To: abb
The Knight Ridder papers are Exhibit A when it comes to "a bad idea, done poorly (and cheaply)".
It is a chain full of papers that richly deserve to die.
14 posted on
11/20/2005 3:17:09 PM PST by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: abb
This is terrible.
What shall we now do for something useless and eminently disposable to put under our cat-litter boxes, especially when we enjoy the heck out of doing it?
15 posted on
11/20/2005 3:18:14 PM PST by
Gritty
("Dems want a firm withdrawl date coinciding with the handover of the Great Satan's cojones-Mk Steyn)
To: abb
Its strategy has been straightforward: Leverage de facto monopoly newspaper status in individual cities into ownership of the classified advertising business in those communities.How does this differ from Gannett's strategy?
To: abb
Come on Rupert. Buy these papers and turn them around like you did with the NY Post.
To: Owl_Eagle; brityank; Physicist; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; GOPJ; abner; baseballmom; Willie Green; Mo1; ..
Nobody-reads-the-Inquirer ping
23 posted on
11/20/2005 3:43:19 PM PST by
Tribune7
To: abb; BlackElk
When I was a youngster ('70's), I was a paperboy, and I eagerly read the comics in the Morning Record and New Haven Register (afternoon). Sometimes I would even buy the best SUnday comics in the universe, the Sunday Boston Herald. As I got older, I started reading the editorials, sports, and news sections.
Now, I have my own children, and the comics section is not fit reading. Even family strips like "For Better or Worse" explore topics (shacking up and homosexuality) that I will not be exposing my children to, and certainly without their slant. The regular news section and especially the "lifestyle" type sections are not fit to have around children, either. I haven't subscribed to a newspaper in ten years (after having TWO separate subscriptions). The odds of any of my children subscribing to the local newspapers when full-grown is next to nil. I am sure I am not alone.
24 posted on
11/20/2005 3:46:40 PM PST by
sittnick
(There's no salvation in politics.)
To: abb
The stockholders at these creaky old papers need to raise hell. Newspapers are a tough enough sell in these days of illiteracy without the editorial staff making it even harder by embracing a worn-out, discredited ideology. Publishers need to hold their senior editors to account, and those editors need to reinstate the time-tested values of objectivity, detachment, and "news you can use" instead of "news that uses you."
27 posted on
11/20/2005 4:32:26 PM PST by
IronJack
To: abb
In Silicon Valley a skyscraper was put up with the Knight-Ridder logo on the top around 2000. A couple of years ago, the logo was removed. Perhaps K-R overbuilt during the dot com boom...
29 posted on
11/20/2005 4:37:09 PM PST by
SteveH
(First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
To: abb
Minus the comics and the crosswords, most papers would fail within 6 mo. They vastly overrate themselves in the propaganda dept. actually.
33 posted on
11/20/2005 5:05:19 PM PST by
Waco
To: All
Suggestion: Faced with the inevitable sales of the Seattle Times and Seattle Post-Intelligencer (what follows the loss of intelligence? you'll find it here) -- don't buy. I wouldn't buy fish wrapped in this stuff (too toxic), and if I had birds I wouldn't line their cages with it. I don't even honor it as woodstove lighter; when they trash my newspaper with a "sample" it goes straight to landfill. Unopened.
When I want to read fiction I buy a novel. Not a newspaper.
38 posted on
11/20/2005 5:54:26 PM PST by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || (To Libs:) You are failing to celebrate MY diversity! || Iran Azadi)
To: abb
These folks at Knight Ridder are smart to want to bail while they still may get some value. The question is, who's the sucker who will BUY?? (Caveat: Possibly Murdoch or somebody like him can come along and get rid of all the liberal deadwood in the newsrooms and editorial boards and actually boost circulation.)
To: abb
classified advertising business
90% of the newspapers available at the newstand are in the business of selling ads. Thus, 90% of the newpapers attract low budget writers and close minded thinkers. Yes, newpapers will always be around and will always be a waste of money for both owners and customers.
51 posted on
11/20/2005 9:44:42 PM PST by
Falconspeed
(Keep your fears to yourself, but share your courage with others. Robert Louis Stevenson)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson