Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How many guns is too many?
Sentinel & Enterprise (Massachussetts) ^ | 11/22/05 | Caitlyn Kelleher

Posted on 11/22/2005 9:19:56 AM PST by kiriath_jearim

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last
To: kiriath_jearim
How many guns is too many?

To a leftist gun-grabber, one is too many!

101 posted on 11/22/2005 1:56:25 PM PST by Col Freeper (Kennedy Spokesman: "Mary would have benefited from the Senator's efforts to protect old people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YouPosting2Me

Sweet! That means I can get 2,147,483,635 more!


102 posted on 11/22/2005 1:59:19 PM PST by BJClinton (The short answer is that I am 47 years old and I am not a blithering idiot. ~Buckhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
Forget the Second. It was nullified by the USSC.

In which case? AFAIK the last second amendment case they heard was in the 1939 in the Miller case in which they determined that the term "arms" meant such arms as would be useful to a militia.

You know, machine guns, riot shotguns, sniper rifles, recoilless rifles, mortars, etc, etc., but they rejected the government's claim that the second only applied to the militia They also ruled that the lower court should not have taken "judicial notice" that a sawed off single shot break action shotgun was such a weapon, without some evidence or testimony indicating that such a weapon would be useful to a militia. It would of course.

Don't believe the Hoplophobes' spin.

103 posted on 11/22/2005 2:49:49 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: BOBWADE
So you tell the single mothers: 'If you have any trouble, just scream. We'll hear you. We'll be there.'

And if you have a spare gun and little ammo, you loan it to them, along with some really rudimentary instruction in how to use it, and how not to. Of course in MY neighborhood, a single mother is likely to be a member of the 4th ID (the folks who "got" Saddam) or the 1st Cav, and will already know how to use it, possibly better than I can, and there'd be a good chance she already has a firearm.

104 posted on 11/22/2005 2:54:22 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: xarmydog
Can carry but not concealed.But then again,thats why i live in Texas.

Actually you were in violation of state law. Only a few states, not including Texas, allow open carry of handguns, without a permit (no such permit in Texas, you just can't do it at all). Long guns are another matter, you can march down main street with a loaded AR-15, or for that matter a Barrett .50 BMG if you want.

105 posted on 11/22/2005 2:57:59 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

Q. How many guns is too many?

A. The number that finally causes your wife to file for divorce.

(In scientific circles I think that is called "supersaturation.")

((Of course for many they would want to know what that number is so they could exceed it by 3 or 4 guns...just to be sure. Which begs the question: "Can one really have too many guns?"))


106 posted on 11/22/2005 6:11:13 PM PST by Abundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

FWIW, these are the same people who would tell us how many dollars we're allowed to own. How much of anything, including opinions.


107 posted on 11/22/2005 6:17:08 PM PST by Sam Cree (absolute reality)- "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

How many pairs of shoes is too many?


108 posted on 11/22/2005 6:20:58 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
I'm a hoplophile with regards to a few calibers.

12 ga (870) .223 (AR15) and .40 (Glock) I don't need anything else except spare parts.

Now considering ammo -- you can never have too much in your favorite calibers.

109 posted on 11/22/2005 6:39:38 PM PST by Bear_Slayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

Well, it's more than a few states that let you carry unconcealed.

I've had personal experience openly carrying in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Montana and Nevada.

Ed


110 posted on 11/22/2005 7:45:48 PM PST by Sir_Ed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
In which case?

Ashcroft v. Raich
"If Congress can regulate this under the Commerce Clause, then it can regulate virtually anything--and the Federal Government is no longer one of limited and enumerated powers." Justice Thomas

"Guns are both articles of commerce and articles that can be used to restrain commerce. Their possession is the consequence, either directly or indirectly, of commercial activity. In my judgment, Congress' power to regulate commerce in firearms includes the power to prohibit possession of guns at any location because of their potentially harmful use". BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General, State of California.
Lockyer wants to treat firearms the same as drugs. The Commerce Clause decision gives congress the power to do that.

Firearm possession is a privilege not a right. The Supreme Court has spoken.
.
111 posted on 11/22/2005 8:05:09 PM PST by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
Ashcroft v. Raich

"If Congress can regulate this under the Commerce Clause, then it can regulate virtually anything--and the Federal Government is no longer one of limited and enumerated powers." Justice Thomas

"Guns are both articles of commerce and articles that can be used to restrain commerce. Their possession is the consequence, either directly or indirectly, of commercial activity. In my judgment, Congress' power to regulate commerce in firearms includes the power to prohibit possession of guns at any location because of their potentially harmful use". BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General, State of California.

First, Raich dealt with Controlled substances, that is illegal drugs, not arms. I see no enumerated right to traffic in controlled substances.

Secondly, Bill Lockyer does not sit on the Supreme Court of the United States. No one outside the state of California need pay any attention to his blather.

I don't agree with the Court's decision, because I agree with Justice Thomas reasoning, but it's a hell of a stretch to say this is any kind of precedent for a Second Amendment case.

112 posted on 11/22/2005 10:24:36 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: YouPosting2Me

That is THE perfect answer, bravo!


113 posted on 11/22/2005 10:26:09 PM PST by thoughtomator (What'ya mean you formatted the cat!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
One point I should have added. The Second Amendment overrides any power delegated to the federal government by the main body of the Constitution. That's the nature of amendments, they take precedent over that which they were amendments to.

Otherwise, we'd have US Senators being elected by state legislatures, the President elect taking office in March after an elections, and no federal income taxes. (Didn't say they were always good, did I? )

114 posted on 11/22/2005 10:28:12 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Sir_Ed
Well, it's more than a few states that let you carry unconcealed.

Not compared to the number that won't. Still it depends on circumstances as well. Both Texas, which has CHL, and Nebraska, which doesn't, allow open carry under some conditions. You just can't be diddy-bopping down the sidewalk in town with a handgun strapped to your hip, ankle or boot. You can do it in the field for example, even if you are fishing (at least in Nebraska, IIRC).

115 posted on 11/22/2005 10:31:51 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
I agree with Justice Thomas reasoning,

Who was speaking against the majority in that case, arguing against the notion that the Commerce clause is all empowering with regard to regulating commerce in anything.

116 posted on 11/22/2005 10:33:24 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

The number of guns isn't as important as their intended use. A collector can have several and use them properly for hunting, target practice, defense or whatever. A felon can have only one, illegally of course, and that one will cause more harm than thousands in the hands of legitimate gun owners.

Of course, disarming criminals might be a tough job, so better to disarm honest citizens, according to the looney left.

A better question might be how many cars is too many for a Kennedy? One Kennedy has killed more people with his car than all my guns combined have.


117 posted on 11/22/2005 10:44:05 PM PST by DakotaRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve
much like the Brady Bill led to high gun sales.
so, what are you thinking?
semi-auto?
118 posted on 11/22/2005 11:59:23 PM PST by ottersnot ( You can't spell Liberal without L, I, E.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
one.
119 posted on 11/23/2005 12:19:45 AM PST by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel

But, if the other boys family had been armed, they could have defended him before he was shot.

The sad part the gun nazis can't grasp is that criminals don't buy their guns through legitimate gun dealers. They buy them through other criminals.


120 posted on 11/23/2005 1:11:00 AM PST by DakotaRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson