Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TN4Liberty

The evolutionist version of "agnostic" is any and all teaching that rejects the "supernatural." How's that for saying, "we don't know?"

"We don't know, but only one side of the argument is allowed a hearing in the classroom."


245 posted on 11/22/2005 7:36:05 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Fester Chugabrew

"The evolutionist version of "agnostic" is any and all teaching that rejects the "supernatural." How's that for saying, "we don't know?""

Since the supernatural is not observable, testable, or repeatable, excluding it from scientific theories is the only logical course to take. Science doesn't say the supernatural doesn't happen, only that it's methodology is incapable of determining if it has or hasn't happened. This has been the accepted limits of science since Galileo and Newton.


248 posted on 11/22/2005 7:39:34 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson