To: dead
Not a very even Battle-of-Wits.
To: Semper Paratus
Al Franken believing that he is capable of debating Justice Scalia?
Think about it.
The foundation for the intensity of liberalism is conceit. These people THINK they're smarter than others. Their rhetorical reactive armor protects them from reason and learning. They should try studying "ethics" for a change instead of party rhetoric.
25 posted on
11/23/2005 9:39:31 AM PST by
Loud Mime
(Bad Lawmakers = Bad Law = Infinite Lawyers)
To: Semper Paratus
Franken came to a battle of the wits unarmed.
31 posted on
11/23/2005 9:42:11 AM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: Semper Paratus
Not even close! I just love this. I heard it being talked about on the radio this morning and it's one of those times ya just wish ya coulda been there!
To: Semper Paratus
"Not a very even Battle-of-Wits."
Al came unarmed.
Justice Scalia probably had to use two brain cells.
66 posted on
11/23/2005 10:08:46 AM PST by
Forgiven_Sinner
(God is offering you eternal life right now. Freep mail me if you want to know how to receive it.)
To: Semper Paratus
Not a very even Battle-of-Wits.
On Franken's part it is was a battle of a half-wit.
89 posted on
11/23/2005 11:12:03 AM PST by
DOGEY
To: Semper Paratus
"
Not a very even Battle-of-Wits."
One has wits. The other is a "Witz." ,p . .
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson