Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/25/2005 11:39:28 AM PST by Termite_Commander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Termite_Commander; PatrickHenry

bump


2 posted on 11/25/2005 11:42:21 AM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Termite_Commander

I heard the lead NASA scientist is named Zefram Cochrane.


4 posted on 11/25/2005 11:48:38 AM PST by Tarantulas ( Illegal immigration - the trojan horse that's treated like a sacred cow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Termite_Commander
"Put a spinning gyroscope into orbit around the Earth, with the spin axis pointed toward some distant star as a fixed reference point. Free from external forces . . ."

That's a loaded assumption. Orbiting the earth, external forces would still be acting upon the gyroscope. Earth's gravity (inversely proportional to distance but still significant to at least the moon and beyond), Jupiter's gravity, solar wind, solar particles, impact particles, van Allen belt magnetics, etc. Of course, the whole Milky Way galaxy is gravitationally wedded, as is the local galaxy cluster so I'm not sure how one would design an experiment "free from external forces".

5 posted on 11/25/2005 11:49:22 AM PST by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Termite_Commander

bump


7 posted on 11/25/2005 11:51:14 AM PST by Mr_Moonlight (Rebuild the Twin Towers just as they were before, only taller this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Termite_Commander

my head hurts


9 posted on 11/25/2005 12:04:27 PM PST by Flavius (Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Termite_Commander

In short, general relativity predicts that a massive rotating object (like the earth) distorts the space around it in such a way that nearby objects that are locally at rest are actually rotating slightly when compared to distant stars. Now, if we are in one of those time vortex's do we get paid time and a-half?


10 posted on 11/25/2005 12:05:40 PM PST by FreeRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

ping


14 posted on 11/25/2005 12:30:16 PM PST by solitas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Termite_Commander
By doing it this way, the scientists should be able to… stay employed for a long time.
15 posted on 11/25/2005 12:31:19 PM PST by solitas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Termite_Commander
"To measure this angle reasonably well, GP-B needed a fantastic precision of 0.0005 arcseconds. It's like measuring the thickness of a sheet of paper held edge-on 100 miles away."

More money for the Nerds!
More money for the Nerds!

They're certainly better with numbers than our bozos in Washington.

18 posted on 11/25/2005 1:23:17 PM PST by manwiththehands (Happy Thanksgiving to our heroes in Iraq. God bless you and Godspeed. Come home safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Termite_Commander
First, though, there are a lot of data to analyze. Stay tuned.

They need to be very sure before they announce the null result. Relativity is an illusion.

21 posted on 11/25/2005 2:06:59 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Termite_Commander

What confuses me is WHY they have not done this experiment already .


33 posted on 11/25/2005 3:49:48 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (secus acutulus exspiro ab Acheron bipes actio absol ab Acheron supplico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson