Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RacerF150

"He said, "It's a restraint of trade for them to do that" and "it might be a violation of antitrust laws.""

I thought the NFL had an anti-trust exemption.


10 posted on 11/29/2005 6:32:59 AM PST by gondramB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gondramB
I thought the NFL had an anti-trust exemption.

No, only Major League Baseball has that. You may recall the anti-trust suit that the USFL launched against the NFL. The NFL was found liable, and had to pay the USFL damages amounting to $3.
44 posted on 11/29/2005 7:04:20 AM PST by sittnick (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB
I thought the NFL had an anti-trust exemption.

Nope, and as such, Congress should keep their freaking noses out of a contract matter that's already gone properly through arbitration.

If MLB were smart, they'd try to get their anti-trust status revoked so they could tell Congress to *** off the next time they want to hold "hearings".

54 posted on 11/29/2005 7:51:13 AM PST by kevkrom (Thank you... I'll be here all week. Don't forget to tip your waitress. (And try the veal!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson