Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Neptune-Size Planet Orbiting Common Star Hints at Many More
space.com ^ | 11/30/05 | Robert Roy Britt

Posted on 11/30/2005 7:21:39 PM PST by KevinDavis

Astronomers have discovered a planet about as massive as Neptune orbiting one of the most common types of stars in the universe.

The star is a red dwarf, a class of star about 50 times fainter than the Sun. Among the 100 stars closest to us, 80 are red dwarfs. But astronomers had so far found only two planets in searches of about 200 red dwarfs, while well more than a hundred planets have been found around other types of stars.

"Our finding possibly means that planets are rather frequent around the smallest stars," says Xavier Delfosse, from the Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Grenoble in France and co-author of the paper relating the work. "It certainly tells us that red dwarfs are ideal targets for the search for exoplanets."

(Excerpt) Read more at space.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: extrasolar; space; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: the final gentleman

"Time will tell, wanna bet?"

Nope. Not on this claim. This is by a European group. I'll wait for our scientists.

I agree that the science is in its infancy and that there will be many false and mistaken claims early on.

However, the end result will that we will find a lot of earth like planets.


21 posted on 11/30/2005 8:20:47 PM PST by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Are they sure it doesn't hint at Michael Moore?


22 posted on 11/30/2005 8:21:26 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Or they find us.


23 posted on 11/30/2005 8:21:39 PM PST by doug from upland (The troops will come home when the mission is complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
The odds for the conditions for earth to exist as it does now without being destroyed by a foreign body, burnt up by the sun, iced over, biologically destroyed, swallowed by a black hole, etc... is astronomical in and of itself.

I think we could find many Europas out there that have an insulative ice covering with an ocean underneath. We'll have no way of knowing whether or not life exists on these worlds without going there and drilling through the icy shell. This won't be happening anytime soon unless we discover warp drive in the next five years.

24 posted on 11/30/2005 8:26:06 PM PST by Brett66 (Where government advances – and it advances relentlessly – freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Astronomers have discovered a planet about as massive as Neptune orbiting one of the most common types of stars in the universe.

Thank God they didn't say that they have discovered a planet as massive as Uranus.

25 posted on 11/30/2005 8:29:52 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (What? Me worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

Both nothing is unique and everything is - at the same time, but in the different aspects. To illustrate - in your own estimation you are unique, but in the estimation of your employer [if you have one] or of the Census Bureau - you are most emphatically not unique, but interchangeable with any other object [employee or inhabitant] of the same class.


26 posted on 11/30/2005 8:55:07 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker
Earth has a unique place in the solar system, actually a unique place in the universe.

That all depends on how like Earth a planet must be to be "earthlike".

As with the Neptune-like planet, about the right mass and composition in a stable orbit is enough.

In this context, Venus and Mars are "earthlike".

27 posted on 11/30/2005 9:14:58 PM PST by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Salman

I guess the metric to measure 'Earth-like" would be: can it sustain life as we know it, with the same gravity and atmosphere.


28 posted on 11/30/2005 9:18:41 PM PST by phantomworker (We don't see things as they are, we see things as WE are.<==> Perception is everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: the final gentleman
I'll bet you my bottom donut that the "planets" that revolve around red giants at a distance of three million miles are revolving around an observational error rather than on empirical reality.

Care to back this up with hard data?

29 posted on 12/01/2005 9:53:00 AM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Or they find us.

And invade us. And conquer us. And enslave or destroy us. (Happy thoughts for the day!)

30 posted on 12/01/2005 10:04:51 AM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker; frogjerk
the probability (that there exists another planet similar to Earth) does NOT equal zero

So far, no two snowflakes have been found that are exactly alike. Alike in some particulars, but not all. Same for moons, planets, stars. Similar enough to inhabit as is: perhaps there are some inside the Milky Way; probably not. Similar enough to be called earthlike: probably; similar enough that survival would be likely: probably not. Even with an oxygen atmosphere and liquid water oceans, the vegetation might well be toxic, the animals and bacteria deadly.

31 posted on 12/01/2005 10:31:19 AM PST by RightWhale (Not transferable -- Good only for this trip)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Realistically, what you say is true.

But theoretically, the P(that there exists another planet similar to Earth) does NOT equal zero.


32 posted on 12/01/2005 11:10:28 AM PST by phantomworker (We don't see things as they are, we see things as WE are.<==> Perception is everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

33 posted on 12/01/2005 11:23:38 AM PST by doug from upland (The troops will come home when the mission is complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker

There are a hundred billion stars in the galaxy. There are a hundred billion galaxies in the Hubble volume. Big number? Odds are against even this one planet.


34 posted on 12/01/2005 1:33:39 PM PST by RightWhale (Not transferable -- Good only for this trip)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

No, but maybe that was the only place that would outsource his ego...


35 posted on 12/01/2005 1:57:26 PM PST by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jigsaw John

However, the star is only 1.3% as luminous as the sun. Therefore, it's probably not nearly as hot as you'd think...may well be similar to Earth in temperature.


36 posted on 12/01/2005 2:02:14 PM PST by RockinRight (It’s likely for a Conservative to be a Republican, but not always the other way around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brett66

Alpha Cen A is slightly larger and brighter than the sun, and Alpha Cen B somewhat dimmer but both are well within the range that most astronomers think would easily support Earth-like planets at the right distance.


37 posted on 12/01/2005 2:06:07 PM PST by RockinRight (It’s likely for a Conservative to be a Republican, but not always the other way around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: the final gentleman

FYI it's a red dwarf, not a red giant.


38 posted on 12/01/2005 2:06:49 PM PST by RockinRight (It’s likely for a Conservative to be a Republican, but not always the other way around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Not similar to earth temps. Red dwarfs are generally thought to have surface temps of about 4,000 degrees or less. Cool as far as star temps go. I think the article states it is believed that this specific planet has surface temps of about 300 degrees.


39 posted on 12/01/2005 2:17:26 PM PST by Jigsaw John
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jigsaw John

True. I do know that if the sun were suddenly replaced with a red dwarf that Earth would freeze into an iceball that never rose above freezing.


40 posted on 12/01/2005 2:33:00 PM PST by RockinRight (It’s likely for a Conservative to be a Republican, but not always the other way around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson