Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Citizen MD [American Medical Association op-ed against Intelligent Design]
American Medical Association ^ | 12/02/2005 | Paul Costello

Posted on 12/03/2005 6:18:54 AM PST by Right Wing Professor

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 381-385 next last
To: PatrickHenry

Damn! Same old players; same old trolls.


241 posted on 12/03/2005 5:40:28 PM PST by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
...lest a grant find its way into the ID crowd. ...

What would the IDers do with a grant? Could you please list some research that they propose that's on hold for lack of money? Why can't DI or ICR or Rev. Moon or the Wahhabis or suchlike fund research until the "theory" is developed enough to convince biologists?

242 posted on 12/03/2005 5:40:52 PM PST by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
There has been a documentary playing on one of the independent channels over the last couple of weeks with that very purpose with respect to physics. I think it was "What Do We Know?".

What's its POV? Tell me more...

243 posted on 12/03/2005 5:46:42 PM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Virginia-American
Have you read Behe's testimony at the Dover trial? This guy's is either a charlatan or mentally ill. His "operational definition" of 'irreducible complexity' was (I paraphrase) 'You can tell if it's irreducibly complex by observing the purposive intention of the components."

Okay, you write the research proposal...

244 posted on 12/03/2005 5:53:18 PM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp

No, that's Fleeing Cur and he doesn't appear to be here right now.


245 posted on 12/03/2005 6:04:15 PM PST by furball4paws (The new elixir of life - dehydrated toad urine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

"I know it when I see it" works for the Supreme Court ... under certain circumstances.


246 posted on 12/03/2005 6:04:26 PM PST by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

There are 2 Sci Fi types.

1. Science Based Fiction - say Sagan's "Contact" which I think he borrowed from Gunn's "The Listeners". There is a very limited place for this stuff in science class. Gives students a real example of how some of the theoretical stuff might be applied. Jules Verne was certainly a far sighted kind of guy in this area.

2. Science Fantasy - belongs in a Fiction class and nowhere else.

"2001" has some of both so could be discussed.


247 posted on 12/03/2005 6:08:30 PM PST by furball4paws (The new elixir of life - dehydrated toad urine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Gumlegs
"I know it when I see it" works for the Supreme Court ... under certain circumstances.

Please elaborate.

248 posted on 12/03/2005 6:08:47 PM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: Rudder
What's its POV? Tell me more...

I only caught the first 5 minutes of it when I taped something else but it seemed to be just asking physicists, philosophers and laymen, just "what do we know" and letting them talk for a minute. It may have led in to something else but I can't seem to find a reference to it now.

249 posted on 12/03/2005 6:12:05 PM PST by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: furball4paws
There are 2 Sci Fi types.

More than that. The SF community has two great categories: SF and fantasy (sword and sorcery). Within the SF category there's "hard science fiction," which extrapolates from genuine science, and there's a load of other stuff, some of the subcategories: sociological, dystopias, "space opera" (like Star Wars), etc.

250 posted on 12/03/2005 6:15:54 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, common scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: 2ndreconmarine

Another way IDer and Creationists are liberals: They're pushing an affirmative action program. I don't see much difference between teaching ID and teaching Afrocentric history or Ebonics.


251 posted on 12/03/2005 6:16:19 PM PST by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6

Not in any science class I teach.


252 posted on 12/03/2005 6:18:23 PM PST by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: balrog666

We could invent our own if you like. Trolls that is.


253 posted on 12/03/2005 6:18:51 PM PST by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
I can't seem to find a reference to it now.

Thanks for looking. Please let me know if you come across more.

254 posted on 12/03/2005 6:22:38 PM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: furball4paws
Did you misspell 'Fleaing Cur'?

Is the cur male or female? (I know it's not PC, but I'm an old fart and generally take it easier on females)
255 posted on 12/03/2005 6:22:47 PM PST by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: furball4paws

Finally, somebody who knows the difference.

It drives me crazy when people include drivel like Star Wars in with Science Fiction.


256 posted on 12/03/2005 6:24:41 PM PST by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp

My dictionary doesn't attach a sex to cur. I suppose you could use curette and cure' to distinguish them.


257 posted on 12/03/2005 6:32:36 PM PST by furball4paws (The new elixir of life - dehydrated toad urine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp

Hey!

I thought Star Wars was great fun and the cantina at Mos Eisley was right out of Astounding Science Fiction ('50s versioof Analog).


258 posted on 12/03/2005 6:34:29 PM PST by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: furball4paws
"My dictionary doesn't attach a sex to cur. I suppose you could use curette and cure' to distinguish them.

I suspect nothing will cure the cur's currishness like a currette applied to the cur's colonic cavity. I'm glad I'm not a religious man, I'd hate to be the cure applying the cure.

259 posted on 12/03/2005 6:55:27 PM PST by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: From many - one.
Yes, Star Wars was great fun, especially when you take the time to figure out where all the ideas come from. But it ain't science fiction!

I stand by my opinion. :^P

260 posted on 12/03/2005 6:58:37 PM PST by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 381-385 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson