Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“Bush Lied About WMD” — retort

Posted on 12/07/2005 12:26:40 PM PST by Retain Mike

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: Retain Mike

If you look it says 2002. The RATS talking point says they were given bad information by the White House. That is theie gripe.

What they should be pointing at is the ABC news story in 1999 about the WMD, The TIME magazine article about Saddams weapons, the Deulfer report, The NY Times, WAPO and LA Times articles and the European intelligence community as well as Clintons bill to overthrow Hussein.

Basically the RATS are trying to rewrite history to say pre 9/11 this never happened.


41 posted on 12/07/2005 1:37:40 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike

IBTZ?


42 posted on 12/07/2005 1:41:54 PM PST by darkangel82 (Never underestimate the stupidity of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD
I am in 100% agreement that this issue needs to be opened up. If it is true that WMDs were moved, it will show that there is a hidden underground of countries acting to keep the existence of them hidden. If even one Nuke were set off in a key city in our country (New York City for example) it would cause such catastrophic consequences that I do not even have words to describe the effects.

This is a shell game we have to win.
43 posted on 12/07/2005 1:51:37 PM PST by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike

ping for later


44 posted on 12/07/2005 1:55:23 PM PST by rlmorel ("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike

This is a great article written by someone on the ground who was a inspector with UNSCOM, his name is Bill Tierney.

Read this thoroughly.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=20154


45 posted on 12/07/2005 2:01:52 PM PST by rlmorel ("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD

also one of our traitorous congress men bragged about warning the enimies before the attack so the sadamites could prepare.


46 posted on 12/07/2005 2:10:31 PM PST by bdfromlv (Leavenworth hard time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nuffsenuff

...thus saying their own heros aren't smart enough to make such evaluations on their own.


47 posted on 12/07/2005 2:11:07 PM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sono
Shirley, he can't be Syria's.

He is Syria's. . .

and don't call him Shirley.

:-)

48 posted on 12/07/2005 4:49:36 PM PST by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

Sorry, but on my screen I don't see Busd. I see Bush three times. I need sone help here.


49 posted on 12/08/2005 11:13:32 AM PST by Retain Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike
Sorry, but on my screen I don't see Busd. I see Bush three times. I need sone help here.

sone   Audio pronunciation of "sone" ( P )  Pronunciation Key  (sn)
n.

    A subjective unit of loudness, as perceived by a person with normal hearing, equal to the loudness of a pure tone having a frequency of 1,000 hertz at 40 decibels.

50 posted on 12/08/2005 11:18:45 AM PST by frogjerk (LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike
Sorry, but on my screen I don't see Busd. I see Bush three times. I need sone help here.

I don't see "Busd" either. Not sure what I'm not seeing, but I can't figure out why you're getting slammed around a bit. Your links aren't "clickable", but I've had that happen to me too when I've tried to post links.

51 posted on 12/08/2005 11:24:44 AM PST by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike
Looks like they all 'lied'. Seems everyone said Iraq had WMD, except the inspectors on the ground who actually looked. Who woulda thunk it. Especially after everyone also believed the aspirin factory that Clinton bombed also was a threat. Are we gullible or dupes?
52 posted on 12/08/2005 11:28:28 AM PST by ex-snook ("Come behold the deeds of the Lord, the astounding things he has wrought on earth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

I am sorry about the "sone", but again I don't see the Busd.


53 posted on 12/08/2005 12:17:03 PM PST by Retain Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle

I see a score of seven to one on typos, right?


54 posted on 12/08/2005 12:19:40 PM PST by Retain Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: thebaron512
HTML tags are easy and we are a lazy lot for good reason ;)

HAHAHA, nicely done.

55 posted on 12/08/2005 12:51:39 PM PST by New Perspective (Proud father of an 2 year old son with Down Syndrome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pcottraux
Why would Bush lie about WMDs?

BINGO!!

I have been saying this since all this BUSH LIED people DIED crap started in the MSM.

In order for Bush to have lied he would have had to be the ONLY PERSON on the face of the earth TO KNOW THAT SADDAM did NOT have WMD because EVERYONE EVERYWHERE KNEW he had them.

Consequently if BUSH KNEW there were NO WMD he ALSO KNEW he would be CAUGHT when NONE where found and that makes as much sense as Howard Dean and the Dimwit Party.

56 posted on 12/08/2005 12:59:59 PM PST by PISANO (We will not tire......We will not falter.......We will NOT FAIL!!! .........GW Bush [Oct 2001])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: aflaak

ping


57 posted on 03/08/2006 2:35:06 PM PST by aflaak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aflaak

ping


58 posted on 09/14/2006 8:26:08 AM PDT by aflaak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson