Skip to comments.
“Bush Lied About WMD” — retort
Posted on 12/07/2005 12:26:40 PM PST by Retain Mike
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
To: Retain Mike
If you look it says 2002. The RATS talking point says they were given bad information by the White House. That is theie gripe.
What they should be pointing at is the ABC news story in 1999 about the WMD, The TIME magazine article about Saddams weapons, the Deulfer report, The NY Times, WAPO and LA Times articles and the European intelligence community as well as Clintons bill to overthrow Hussein.
Basically the RATS are trying to rewrite history to say pre 9/11 this never happened.
41
posted on
12/07/2005 1:37:40 PM PST
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
To: Retain Mike
42
posted on
12/07/2005 1:41:54 PM PST
by
darkangel82
(Never underestimate the stupidity of government.)
To: GOP_1900AD
I am in 100% agreement that this issue needs to be opened up. If it is true that WMDs were moved, it will show that there is a hidden underground of countries acting to keep the existence of them hidden. If even one Nuke were set off in a key city in our country (New York City for example) it would cause such catastrophic consequences that I do not even have words to describe the effects.
This is a shell game we have to win.
To: Retain Mike
44
posted on
12/07/2005 1:55:23 PM PST
by
rlmorel
("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
To: Retain Mike
45
posted on
12/07/2005 2:01:52 PM PST
by
rlmorel
("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
To: GOP_1900AD
also one of our traitorous congress men bragged about warning the enimies before the attack so the sadamites could prepare.
46
posted on
12/07/2005 2:10:31 PM PST
by
bdfromlv
(Leavenworth hard time)
To: nuffsenuff
...thus saying their own heros aren't smart enough to make such evaluations on their own.
To: sono
Shirley, he can't be Syria's.He is Syria's. . .
and don't call him Shirley.
:-)
48
posted on
12/07/2005 4:49:36 PM PST
by
Fedora
To: frogjerk
Sorry, but on my screen I don't see Busd. I see Bush three times. I need sone help here.
To: Retain Mike
Sorry, but on my screen I don't see Busd. I see Bush three times. I need sone help here.
sone Audio pronunciation of "sone" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (sn)
n.
A subjective unit of loudness, as perceived by a person with normal hearing, equal to the loudness of a pure tone having a frequency of 1,000 hertz at 40 decibels.
50
posted on
12/08/2005 11:18:45 AM PST
by
frogjerk
(LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
To: Retain Mike
Sorry, but on my screen I don't see Busd. I see Bush three times. I need sone help here.I don't see "Busd" either. Not sure what I'm not seeing, but I can't figure out why you're getting slammed around a bit. Your links aren't "clickable", but I've had that happen to me too when I've tried to post links.
51
posted on
12/08/2005 11:24:44 AM PST
by
Chena
(I'm not young enough to know everything.)
To: Retain Mike
Looks like they all 'lied'. Seems everyone said Iraq had WMD, except the inspectors on the ground who actually looked. Who woulda thunk it. Especially after everyone also believed the aspirin factory that Clinton bombed also was a threat. Are we gullible or dupes?
52
posted on
12/08/2005 11:28:28 AM PST
by
ex-snook
("Come behold the deeds of the Lord, the astounding things he has wrought on earth.")
To: frogjerk
I am sorry about the "sone", but again I don't see the Busd.
To: Owl_Eagle
I see a score of seven to one on typos, right?
To: thebaron512
HTML tags are easy and we are a lazy lot for good reason ;)HAHAHA, nicely done.
55
posted on
12/08/2005 12:51:39 PM PST
by
New Perspective
(Proud father of an 2 year old son with Down Syndrome)
To: pcottraux
Why would Bush lie about WMDs?BINGO!!
I have been saying this since all this BUSH LIED people DIED crap started in the MSM.
In order for Bush to have lied he would have had to be the ONLY PERSON on the face of the earth TO KNOW THAT SADDAM did NOT have WMD because EVERYONE EVERYWHERE KNEW he had them.
Consequently if BUSH KNEW there were NO WMD he ALSO KNEW he would be CAUGHT when NONE where found and that makes as much sense as Howard Dean and the Dimwit Party.
56
posted on
12/08/2005 12:59:59 PM PST
by
PISANO
(We will not tire......We will not falter.......We will NOT FAIL!!! .........GW Bush [Oct 2001])
To: aflaak
57
posted on
03/08/2006 2:35:06 PM PST
by
aflaak
To: aflaak
58
posted on
09/14/2006 8:26:08 AM PDT
by
aflaak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson