Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In the Year 2104 -- Americans Will Speak a New Kind of English
IMdiversity.com ^ | 2005 | Franz Schurmann

Posted on 12/09/2005 7:46:00 AM PST by robowombat

In the Year 2104 -- Americans Will Speak a New Kind of English Like other major languages in history, American English as we know it will be transformed by the diverse communities seeking to retain their own identities in the United States By Franz Schurmann, Pacific News Service

What will Americans be like linguistically in a century from now? Given that America will still be a world-spanning empire and civilization, we can look for cultural clues in earlier empires and civilizations.

Dialects are variants of established languages. Pidgins are amalgams of two languages. English is a pidgin. In the 14th century English storytellers, notably Chaucer, decided to fuse French, the language of the Norman conquerors of Britain, with the common Anglo-Saxon language (itself a pidgin of two Germanic languages).

But a more dramatic pidginization occurred two centuries later when the Mughal (Mongol) conquerors of India created an empire that lasted three centuries. Now, despite many cultural variants, the current official languages, Hindi for India and Urdu for Pakistan, both have their origins in "Hindustani," the pidgin name used by the Mughals and then by the imperial British.

American troops in Iraq and Iraqi merchants are already creating pidgins of English and the Iraqi dialects of Arabic. That is similar to what Mughal soldiers did when they went into town to haggle. Urdo/Urdu is a Turco-Mongolian word that meant a "military encampment." If American soldiers and merchants should still be stationed in Iraq in 2104 then it's a good chance that a new language will have arisen, e.g., "Amerarab." And then some writers, like Chaucer, will see if they can sell a novel written in Amerarab.

When the Western Roman Empire officially fell in 476, Britain's Latin-speaking population, mostly soldiers, were worried what to do. But contemporary English archeologists found out what Roman soldiers did. The archeologists carried out diggings in all towns that had the suffix "chester," an Anglo-Saxon variant of Latin "castrum," for military encampment. There are dozens of cities and towns in England with the suffix "chester." Since most of the Roman military encampments were built by a single plan, the archeologists could judge what happened before and after 476. The archeologists concluded that most soldiers remained in Britain and became merchants.

In the heartland of the USA a new pidgin is arising called "Spanglish." Harvard Professor Samuel P. Huntington warns Americans that Spanglish already poses a mortal threat to English. But there is a good chance that in 2104 Spanglish storytellers will replicate the historical formation of English. They will create a new pidgin language that has a Spanish syntax, just as English is based on an Anglo-Saxon syntax.

African Americans speak English as do their millions of kinfolk in Africa and the Caribbean. But they also speak dialects of English that other Americans have difficulty understanding. Some linguists classify the Gullah language, spoken in the North Carolina islands, as a pidgin that is based on West African syntax. But others say Gullah is a dialect of English, just as French, Spanish and Romanian began as offshoots of Latin.

I remember an incident when I was in Guyana in South America. Guyana's population is 40 percent black, mainly middle-class, and 50 percent East Indian, mainly rural. Once, when traveling inland, I heard a number of my Guyanan companions speaking a language I had never heard. When I came close to our table where we were eating, they quickly shifted to English. I sat down and waited politely until I could ask them what language they were speaking. When I finally asked them, to a man they said in unison: English. But I persisted and soon enough they gave in and said: Creole. I was still not satisfied. I knew that Creole was a kind of dialect but also an intellectual word I rarely heard from ordinary people. Then one of the men at the table said, "Yes, we call both English, but we have two kinds of English, one for our people and one for outsiders." I then said, "I'm the outsider." And we all laughed.

African Americans, especially from the South, have family get-togethers that can include many hundreds of participants. They, too, according to AfricanAmerican friends, speak two kinds of English. Yet, the attempt by many African Americans to get Ebonics, a dialect of English, recognized as a valid language failed because Ebonics is a private, not a public, language.

Back in the early 1800s the "Massachusetts Reformers" like Horace Mann had educational visions of what the new America should be. The reformers were deeply affected by ancient Greek civilization, what they overlooked was that the Greeks could not get together to face a mortal danger coming from Macedonia. Not long after they preached their visions of the new America, the Civil War broke out and the North came close to losing at Gettysburg.

The Massachusetts Reformers wanted to create a new nation and nationality. They wanted all people to become part of one national identity. But African Americans in the east and south, Latinos and Asians in the west, and Indigenous people everywhere in the USA, have insisted that their identities must also be preserved. From these peoples, who now are a majority in California, the core issue is language, and their efforts to retain their collective identities will lead to the transformation of American English as the language of all.

Franz Schurmann, emeritus professor of history and sociology at UC Berkeley and author of numerous books.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: 2104; english; language; trends
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
A good example of why cultural marxist intellectuals are dangerous. Franz Schrmann longtime UC Berekely luminary compaisantly looks forward to, no encourages, the emergence of Balkinized America. I am sure he was cheering each night of the recent French auto burning follies.
1 posted on 12/09/2005 7:46:01 AM PST by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: robowombat

My wife is Mexican and we speak Espanglish every day.

I never studied Spanish but I took 4 years of Latin in High school.

Spanish seems fairly easy..


2 posted on 12/09/2005 7:50:44 AM PST by Mikey_1962 (I grew up in a slum, when I got to college it had become a "ghetto".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
English is a pidgin.

Aaaaarrrrrggghhhh!

Not it is not!

A pidgin is a simplified form of an existing language which is spoken according to the word order of another language.

English is not a pidgin!

Although English absorbed many words from French and Latin, English is not a simplified form of French spoken according to Anglo-Saxon word order.

3 posted on 12/09/2005 7:51:06 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Wow, this article drifted off tangent too far. I wanted to read about theory/speculation what the language would be like in 2104


4 posted on 12/09/2005 7:51:57 AM PST by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
American English as we know it will be transformed by the diverse communities seeking to retain their own identities in the United States

Si, yo se.

5 posted on 12/09/2005 7:53:11 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Will mass media encourage changes in the language by making them easier to spread?


6 posted on 12/09/2005 7:55:13 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Well, we certainly speak differently now than we did 100 yrs ago too.

So what. Language always changes over time.


7 posted on 12/09/2005 7:57:16 AM PST by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Igpay atinlay will rule the day


8 posted on 12/09/2005 7:57:18 AM PST by yobid (What we have here is a failure to communicate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Neither is Hindi. Even though it has some words borrowed from Persian.


9 posted on 12/09/2005 7:58:18 AM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
Merde!
10 posted on 12/09/2005 7:58:30 AM PST by Bender2 (Even dirty old robots need love!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Based on the language I heard on a trip to London, we already speak a different kind of English.

By 2014, 13375|°34|< will prevail.


11 posted on 12/09/2005 8:00:43 AM PST by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
I only speak in 1's and 0's.

Do you know what I 1001001010001001001?

12 posted on 12/09/2005 8:01:48 AM PST by Lazamataz (Proudly Lying About My Sign-Up Date Since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
Compare current English with English from 1800. Now compare 1800 English to 1600 English and 1600 English to 1400 English. You will see that English is now changing much more slowly than it has in the past. Sure, new words are being added, especially for new inventions and concept. However you could drop someone from 1800 into modern times with little to no trouble. With widespread literacy and modern communications there is far less chance for a new regional sublanguage to develop.
13 posted on 12/09/2005 8:01:49 AM PST by KarlInOhio (In memory of Alvin Owen, Thsai-Shai Yang, Yen-I Yang and Yee Chen Lin:the victims of Tookie Williams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
One thing to consider, though, is that these various dialects might be perfectly understandable from a linguistic standpoint but are nothing more than gibberish in any other context -- i.e., they aren't conducive to any kind of use in a written environment.

I don't think this is such a bad thing, as what we are basically seeing is a clear division in the U.S. between those who are capable of reading/writing and those who are not. And "those who are not" are destined for a lifetime of mediocrity.

14 posted on 12/09/2005 8:02:59 AM PST by Alberta's Child (What it all boils down to is that no one's really got it figured out just yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Kerry speaks "nuance". A confusing and conflicting language. Words often changing meaning in hours!


15 posted on 12/09/2005 8:03:21 AM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yobid
Igpay atinlay will rule the day

Ah, you pidgin speaker you.

Shouldn't that be,
"Igpay atinlay illway uleray ethay ayday."

16 posted on 12/09/2005 8:04:32 AM PST by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
Kerry speaks "nuance". A confusing and conflicting language. Words often changing meaning in hours!

Seared: lightly impressed on the mind, as if by a dream or a fantasy.

17 posted on 12/09/2005 8:04:55 AM PST by KarlInOhio (In memory of Alvin Owen, Thsai-Shai Yang, Yen-I Yang and Yee Chen Lin:the victims of Tookie Williams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

The new english is being written by Snoopdog.....I'm down wid dat.


18 posted on 12/09/2005 8:07:42 AM PST by showme_the_Glory (No more rhyming, and I mean it! ..Anybody got a peanut.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

What be this thang try'n ta say?


19 posted on 12/09/2005 8:08:32 AM PST by devane617 (An Alley-Cat mind is a terrible thing to waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

You're right. The printing press and standardized spelling helped slow language change and as you say, so has modern communications. The beauty of English is that it accepts foreign words so easily. The presence of so many French words along side of Anglo-Saxon words of similar meaning gave English the ability to make fine distinctions in concepts and its continuing acceptance of foreign words insures its place as the prominent global political and commercial language today. This author is trying to superimpose his leftist ideas on the adaptability and primacy of English today throughout the world.


20 posted on 12/09/2005 8:10:25 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson