Are the Mullahs sane?

The American Thinker ^ | December 9th, 2005 | James Lewis

[karnage]

In other news...

Are Democrats patriotic?
Was Stalin Gandhi?
Is crack good for you?

[OldYank1]

Does anyone really believe that if Iran nuked Israel the rest of the world (UN) would condone a retaliatory strike by the US? We may be upset and ready to strike but we would be facing the same opposition we are facing now. There would be calls for sanctions and summits and everyone would condemn the Iranian action but the call would still be for a diplomatic settlement.

[tkathy]

The question is: are muslims sane? Do they act sane?

[tomahawk]

They are not sane.

Nor are those who would allow them to develop nuclear weapons.

[2001convSVT]

You are right. No one wants to do anything about Iranian atomic weapons. It is also for that same reason that Iran will have atomic weapons shortly.
Additionally the United States see the upside of an Iranian atomic bomb,and will do nothing to prevent them from getting them. The upside is that smaller non-nuclear states (Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon etc) will want to get under the US's nuclear umbrella and thereby more under the US sphere of influence.
The only problem with this is although it worked with the Soviets during the cold war it will not work with the Iranians because as someone wiser once said the the Soviets love their children as much as the US loves hers. I have no evidence to indicate that Iran loves her children, on the contrary Iranians send its children out to suicide bomb the innocent. I see a strong possibility that the Iranians will use their new atomic weapons as soon as possible. It is for this reason I hope the world never sees an atomic backed Iran.

[ApplegateRanch]

Are the Mullahs sane?

Hell, NO!

They're top of the heap Raghead Muslims, aren't they? What more proof do you need?