Skip to comments.
Rock of offense:
By blackballing Christian prayer, a federal judge creates a state religion
WORLD ^
| December 17, 2005
| Gene Edward Veith
Posted on 12/09/2005 12:26:51 PM PST by Caleb1411
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
12/09/2005 12:26:53 PM PST
by
Caleb1411
To: Caleb1411
Islamic prayersas were also offered in the Indiana House and noted with approval in Judge David Hamilton's rulingbegin "In the name of Allah, the merciful." Is it legal to invoke Allah's name, and not that of Jesus Christ?
2
posted on
12/09/2005 12:31:22 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: BenLurkin
3
posted on
12/09/2005 12:33:01 PM PST
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Exalt the Lord our God, and worship at His footstool; He is holy. Ps 99:5)
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
4
posted on
12/09/2005 12:35:38 PM PST
by
L98Fiero
To: Caleb1411
This article is spot on. That is exactly what this atheist judge did - he established the State prayer and if you choose to pray otherwise, you are in violation of his established religion and in danger of punishment. This has to be overturned and/or Americans must disobey it and let the petty dictator come arrest them. If I were an elected leader there I would be walking around saying "Hi (Jesus) how (Jesus) are (Jesus) you (Jesus)."
5
posted on
12/09/2005 12:35:47 PM PST
by
Galveston Grl
(Getting angry and abandoning power to the Democrats is not a choice.)
To: Caleb1411
The Indiana House of Representatives should tell the Federal Court to go to Hell and do what they want.
6
posted on
12/09/2005 12:37:02 PM PST
by
microgood
To: microgood
"The Indiana House of Representatives should tell the Federal Court to go to Hell and do what they want."
No need...sounds like the Fed is well on it's way...
To: microgood
Is the Indiana House controlled by a Republican majority? It would take a backbone to defy the judge's ruling and I'm not sure Republicans are up to it these days.
8
posted on
12/09/2005 12:44:16 PM PST
by
Russ
To: Caleb1411
The proper response to this is to ignore the judge and do it anyway. What's the federal judge going to do about it?
Let an elected official lead the prayer and let him tell the judge that he is exercising his first ammendment rights.
Have him tell the judge that he is answerable for what he says to the people who elected him, and if they are unhappy with him expressing his personal faith while in office they can choose to not reelect him.
To: Caleb1411
any kind of prayer that mentions "Christ's name or title."
Very specific language.
10
posted on
12/09/2005 12:48:23 PM PST
by
PeterPrinciple
(Seeking the truth here folks.)
To: Russ
It would take a backbone to defy the judge's ruling and I'm not sure Republicans are up to it these days.
Good point, unfortunately.
To: BenLurkin
Is it legal to invoke Allah's name, and not that of Jesus Christ?
Probably (in my non-expert opinion).
Seeing how all the Democrats and ACLU Jihad is built on the
Jeffersonian "separation of church and state".
And Jefferson never said anything about "separation of mosque and state".
Amazing how picky liberals are when doing an exegesis of their scriptures.
12
posted on
12/09/2005 12:51:46 PM PST
by
VOA
To: Caleb1411
The Indiana State Constitution, in
Article 4, Section 8 says of its legislators:
"They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.
Seems to me that the courts of Indiana can't do a damn thing if one of the legislators themselves offered a prayer on the floor of the legislature. Even if they find it a violation of their constitution, the Indiana Executive branch is powerless to prevent it.
13
posted on
12/09/2005 1:02:23 PM PST
by
RonF
To: BenLurkin
"In the name of Allah, the merciful."
Sorry, but isn't that their GOD?
To: Caleb1411
"A federal court has ruled that the Indiana House of Representatives may not open with any kind of prayer that mentions "Christ's name or title." "
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,"
Courts cannot make law by fiat which is wholly unconstitutional.
Who will arrest someone in this country for speaking the name of Christ?
That pig will be roasting on a pit before nightfall!
To: Russ
Yes, the Indiana House is controlled by Republicans. I don't know if the Republicans will defy the ruling, but it sounds like a Democrat might. Rep. Goodin, a Crothersville Democrat, has said that he wanted to deliver the first prayer when the House opens next month. He was quoted as saying
"A judge is not going to tell me what I can or cannot say to express my belief in Christ."
16
posted on
12/09/2005 1:24:36 PM PST
by
americangirl1031
(One man with courage makes a majority. --Andrew Jackson)
To: Caleb1411
"And blessed is he who does not take offense at Me."
- Matthew 11:6, Luke 7:23
But Peter said to Him, "Even though all may fall away, yet I will not."
- Mark 14:29
17
posted on
12/09/2005 1:40:33 PM PST
by
Sopater
(Creatio Ex Nihilo)
To: Caleb1411
Where is the oucry that there should be of the christians in this country. Over the years we have been asleep. How can a christian nation have 40 million deaths from abortion and not rise up in great numbers. There are too many of those who say they are christian and go along with gay marriage, abortion. Conversion should be first with the christians. John the Baptists lost his head preaching to repent of sin. And Jesus said there was no one greater than John the Baptist. We need more preaching on sin and repentance.The battle has been won by christ but the war against him is still very much on.
18
posted on
12/09/2005 2:06:23 PM PST
by
red irish
(Gods Children in the womb are to be loved too!)
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
19
posted on
12/09/2005 2:23:02 PM PST
by
Cindy
To: L98Fiero
20
posted on
12/09/2005 2:23:52 PM PST
by
Cindy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson