[cornelis]

You've introduced a new concept. The "exclusion" is a logical opposition that involves different features than the zero-sum fallacy.

In any case, a medical condition does not exclude divine agency.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

" In any case, a medical condition does not exclude divine agency."

It's not that calls to divine action aren't possible after the natural causes of the medical condition are discovered, it's that they are no longer necessary. Why bring in a supernatural explanation when a natural, testable one will do perfectly well?

[Right Wing Professor]

The "exclusion" is a logical opposition that involves different features than the zero-sum fallacy.

If the intersection of sets A and set B is zero, and if the union of A and B is C, and we move elements into set A, from within C, then we must subtract the same elements from B.

In any case, a medical condition does not exclude divine agency.

It does if you accept a naturalistic explanation for disease.