Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hosepipe; betty boop; cornelis
Thank you so much for the ping to your post!

Once upon a time "science" referred to the entire body of knowledge, episteme - philosophy - spiritual and natural - all of it. Hence I Timothy 6:20-21 in the King James translation says:

O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane [and] vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace [be] with thee. Amen.

The modern translations accommodate science tunneling its field of view to nature alone and use the word "philosophy" to keep an overarching meaning - all attempts of science to unseat philosophy notwithstanding.

631 posted on 12/13/2005 11:15:33 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 617 | View Replies ]


To: Alamo-Girl
Once upon a time "science" referred to the entire body of knowledge, episteme - philosophy - spiritual and natural - all of it. Hence I Timothy 6:20-21 in the King James translation says:

Actually "the entire body of knowledge, episteme - philosophy - spiritual and natural - all of it" was not what Paul was refering to in I Timothy 6:20-21

666 posted on 12/13/2005 12:06:46 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (so natural to mankind is intolerance in whatever they really care about - J S Mill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 631 | View Replies ]

To: Alamo-Girl

Science doesn't try to unseat philosophy any more than it tries to unseat mathematics.

But science can change our perception of what is normal, reasonable, intuitive and natural by expanding our ability to observe.

Things that have historically have eluded our ability to assign causes have had causes assigned by science. Some are mundane like volcanos and earthquakes; some a little more difficult, like mental illness.

Our interpretation of these phenomena changes as science advances.


675 posted on 12/13/2005 12:19:53 PM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 631 | View Replies ]

To: Alamo-Girl
[ The modern translations accommodate science tunneling its field of view to nature alone and use the word "philosophy" to keep an overarching meaning - all attempts of science to unseat philosophy notwithstanding. ]

Ouch... that had to hurt some calloused conciences..
Hmmmmm.. calloused conciences don't feel pain... DuuuH on my part...

766 posted on 12/13/2005 5:20:23 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 631 | View Replies ]

To: Alamo-Girl
Once upon a time "science" referred to the entire body of knowledge, episteme - philosophy - spiritual and natural - all of it.

This is exactly why we distinguish the natural sciences from the broader spectrum of science (i.e. social science, philosophical science, etc.):

From the Oxford American Dictionary:

natural science
noun (usu. natural sciences)
a branch of science that deals with the physical world, e.g., physics, chemistry, geology, and biology.
 • the branch of knowledge that deals with the study of the physical world.

DERIVATIVES natural scientist noun

With all due respect, complaining that the natural sciences don't address the supernatural seems to me to be like complaining that a laxative won't get rid of your headache. I'm fine with ID being taught as part of the broader scope of philosophy (as are most other supporters of teaching evolution), but not under the pretense of it being part of the natural science of biology.

851 posted on 12/13/2005 10:12:02 PM PST by Quark2005 (No time to play. One post per day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 631 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson