Skip to comments.
737 as popular as ever (Spirit workers to celebrate 5,000th fuselage)
The Wichita Eagle ^
| Posted on Sun, Dec. 11, 2005
| Reach Molly McMillin
Posted on 12/12/2005 9:57:19 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: Paleo Conservative
It looks like its been made with bondo!
I used to have to walk beneath the wing of a parked 720B (which is still flying for Honeywell as an engine test bed) to get to the crew bus, it was a well worn PA bird. Rivet city, not pretty up close!
To: Central Scrutiniser
A319s are smaller and generally don't have transcon range problems - it's a smaller plane.
JetBlue has problems with its Burbank-JFK flights because Burbank's runway is relatively short. So they limit the number of passengers on those planes. Some of their A320 transcons need to make stops if the weather is bad at their destination or headwinds are fierce, but I don't think it's as common as some think.
To: conservative in nyc
I'd like to see them do it out of SNA.
It still amazes me that Aloha does Hawaii flights out of there and that tiny runway.
We start 757 service to Honolulu and Maui on Friday, finally got our planes ETOPS certified. Probably be a while till I can find an empty flight though.
To: Central Scrutiniser
24
posted on
12/12/2005 10:59:13 PM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey hey ho ho Andy Heyward's got to go!)
To: Paleo Conservative
Yep, I saw it flying a few weeks back, great to see that in the air!
To: Paleo Conservative
One website said it was a Northwest plane, but it had a PA tail number, who knows?
To: Paleo Conservative
I thought that Boeing celebrated the 6,000 th airframe of the 737? not 5,000,, unless that was a typo.
To: Central Scrutiniser
To bad they can't put the first 737 at the AIR& SPACE museum or any other indoors museum to keep it out of the weather, just like they did with the original DASH-80.
When Boeing was developing and building the 777, they actually used the prototype 747 for a flying testbed of the first P&W engine that first went on the 777.
Needless to say on one of those test, the 777 engine backfired ( engine surge ) from continual testing and abuse from testing.
I saw on Airliners.net that someone showed pictures of the original 747 prototype, and it was just sitting in the desert, and some of the paint on it was just fading away ( a sad sight to see ) Boeing gave it to some air museum, but, it looks like they are not taking care of it.
I just wish they had room at the AIR&SPACE museum in Washington D.C. to keep these great airplanes.
I know the AIR&SPACE museum would take good care of these planes.
To: Central Scrutiniser
I was wondering something ?
How come they can't reuse the aluminum from old airplanes, melt down the old aluminum and reuse it ?
I know they use aluminum from old airplanes for other uses, but, I am not sure they use old aluminum from old airplanes for new airplanes.,,,,,,,,, but,, then again ? if they are going to use composites, then, that is a mute point then.
To: Paleo Conservative
I know the prototype of the 707 is there, the DASH-80, the very same plane in that picture that TEX JOHNSON did that barrel roll in.
To: Central Scrutiniser
I was on a 757 once, loved the flight, comfortable airplane ( at least in my opinion ) to bad Boeing has or already is going to stop production on the 757.
To: Paleo Conservative
Only white knuckles I ever had in a 737 were actually in a T-43 in the mid 80's, flying out of old Mather AFB with the 452 FTS. DRs and Cele were stressfull but I never worried about the airframe!
32
posted on
12/13/2005 4:08:31 AM PST
by
truemiester
(If the U.S. should fail, a veil of darkness will come over the Earth for a thousand years)
To: Central Scrutiniser
( http://www.flightlevel350.com/viewer.php?id=4595 )
( http://www.flightlevel350.com/viewer.php?id=4592 )
( http://www.flightlevel350.com/viewer.php?id=4583 )
( http://www.flightlevel350.com/viewer.php?id=4457 )
There you go, the 757 taking off for your viewing pleasure.
To: Central Scrutiniser
To: ATCNavyRetiree
Boeing did some modifications to the rudder and tail of the 737.
They increased the height of the of the rudder and vertical stabilizer of the 737, and re-engineerd the rudder hydraulic actuators.
To: HolgerDansk
"If the country ever needs another medium bomber or cruise missile platform, the 737 would be just the ticket."
Boeing is now offering a maritime patrol variant of the 737. I just wonder if it can loiter like a P-3 Orion (descendant of another airliner, the Electra, although nowhere near as successful as the 737. Same goes for the Nimrod/Comet). Just add a weapons bay, a sonobouy dispenser, MAD boom, surface search radar, and load the passenger compartment with the signal processing equipment.
36
posted on
12/13/2005 5:21:13 AM PST
by
Fred Hayek
(Liberalism is a mental disorder)
To: HolgerDansk
The 737 is probably the world's most overpowered airliner, and the Southwest pilots seem to delight in this fact during takeoff. If the country ever needs another medium bomber or cruise missile platform, the 737 would be just the ticket. I used to ride Indian Airlines 737s into the Shrinigar (Kashmir) airport back in the early 80s. I think that runway was about as long as my driveway, and the air was reeeeeal thin up there. Those IA pilots used to firewall those engines on takeoff and landings, every single time.
You think the 737 is a hot bird, but I dare say you have never felt what it is really capable of. When they set that thing down and hit the thrust reversers, you were thrown against the belt so hard, half the people would have bumped their heads on the seat in front of them, if the seat had not already collapsed forward.
Pretty exciting stuff. Takeoffs were fun too...
37
posted on
12/13/2005 6:10:18 AM PST
by
gridlock
(eliminate perverse incentives)
To: Central Scrutiniser
However, the A320-200's in JetBlue configuration still has trouble flying westbound from JFK to the US West Coast on a full load--I believe that JetBlue cannot fly the plane in full 162-passenger configuration on flights like JFK to Oakland, CA or JFK to Long Beach, CA. The 737-800 with the Aviation Partners winglets could easily fly fully-loaded from JFK to Oakland, CA year-round.
To: Prophet in the wilderness
That was the order not the fuselage. The 737 has a backlog of over 1,000 orders. That's one reason why Boeing is setting up a second 737 line in the space where the 757 line was. At one time there was speculation that Boeing was going to set up moving production lines that could produce both 737's and 757's simultaneously. Apparently it wasn't feasible.
39
posted on
12/13/2005 6:37:23 AM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey hey ho ho Andy Heyward's got to go!)
To: Fred Hayek; RayChuang88
Boeing is now offering a maritime patrol variant of the 737. I just wonder if it can loiter like a P-3 Orion I wonder if the same plane will be offered as a BBJ-2ER with the room of 727-200 but the range of the BBj-1 or better.
40
posted on
12/13/2005 6:42:13 AM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey hey ho ho Andy Heyward's got to go!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson