Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RAFSANJANI SAYS MUSLIMS SHOULD USE NUCLEAR WEAPON AGAINST ISRAEL
IPS ^ | 12/14/2005

Posted on 12/13/2005 1:07:13 PM PST by Rutles4Ever

TEHRAN 14 Dec. (IPS) One of Iran’s most influential ruling cleric called Friday on the Muslim states to use nuclear weapon against Israel, assuring them that while such an attack would annihilate Israel, it would cost them "damages only".

"If a day comes when the world of Islam is duly equipped with the arms Israel has in possession, the strategy of colonialism would face a stalemate because application of an atomic bomb would not leave any thing in Israel but the same thing would just produce damages in the Muslim world", Ayatollah Ali Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani told the crowd at the traditional Friday prayers in Tehran.

Analysts said not only Mr. Hashemi-Rafsanjani’s speech was the strongest against Israel, but also this is the first time that a prominent leader of the Islamic Republic openly suggests the use of nuclear weapon against the Jewish State.

"It seems that Mr. Hashemi-Rafsanjani is forgetting that due to the present intertwinement of Israel and Palestine, the destruction of the Jewish State would also means the mass killing of Palestinian population as well", observed one Iranian commentator.

While Israel is believed to possess between 100 to 200 nuclear war heads, the Islamic Republic and Iraq are known to be working hard to produce their own atomic weapons with help from Russia and North Korea, Pakistan, also a Muslim state, has already a certain number of nuclear bomb.

In a lengthy speech to mark the so-called "International Qods (Jerusalem) Day" celebrated in Iran only, Mr. Hashemi-Rafsanjani, who, as the Chairman of the Assembly to Discern the Interests of the State, is the Islamic Republic’s number two man after Ayatollah Ali Khameneh’i, said since Israel was an emanation of Western colonialism therefore "in future it will be the interests of colonialism that will determine existence or non-existence of Israel".

Mr. Hashemi-Rafsanjani made the unprecedented threat as, following new suicide operations inside Israel and against Israeli settlements by Palestinian extremists in PA-controlled zones, responded by Israel’s heaviest bombarding of Palestinian cities, police, communication and radio-television installations, killing and wounding more than 200 people on both sides, resulted in the halting of all contacts between Israel and the PA of Mr. Yaser Arafat.

He said since Israel is the product of Western colonialism, "the continued existence of Israel depends on interests of arrogance and colonialism and as long as the base is helpful for colonialism, it is going to keep it.

Hashemi-Rafsanjani advised Western states not to pin their hopes on Israel's violence because it will be "very dangerous".

"We are not willing to see security in the world is harmed", he said, warning against the "eruption of the Third World War.

"War of the pious and martyrdom seeking forces against peaks of colonialism will be highly dangerous and might fan flames of the World War III", the former Iranian president said, backing firmly suicide operations against Israel.

Quoted by the official news agency IRNA, Mr. Hashemi-Rafsanjani said weakening of Palestinian Jihad is "unlikely", as the Palestinians have come to the conclusion that talks would be effective only "in light of struggle and self-sacrifice- the two key elements that gave way to beginning of the second Intifada". Iranian analysts and commentators outside Iran immediately reacted to Mr. Hashemi-Rafsanjani’s statement, expressing fear that it might trigger an international backlash against Iran itself, giving Israel, the United States and other Western and even Arab nations to further isolate Iran as a source of threat to regional security. "Jews shall expect to be once again scattered and wandering around the globe the day when this appendix is extracted from the region and the Muslim world", Mr. Hashemi-Rafsanjani warned, blaming on the United States and Britain the "creation of the fabricated entity" in the heart of Arab and Muslim world.

"The man who considers himself as the most able politician in the Islamic Republic utters such nonsense and empty threats at a very time that the hard line and extremist government of Israel under Mr. Ariel Sharon is looking for justification of its repressive policy against Palestinians", said Mr. Ahmad Salamatian, a veteran political analyst based in Paris.

"At a time that the right wing Israeli government is claiming that the very existence of Israel and the Jews are threatened and uses this pretext as an instrument to advance its policy of repression in Palestine, such statements and ushering such dangerous menaces by one of Iran’s top officials is nothing but bringing water to Israel’s propaganda mill, providing it with more justifications explaining its present maximalist policy", he told the Persian service of Radio France Internationale.

Though Mr. Salamatian is of the opinion that Mr. Hashemi-Rafsanjani’s words are part of both his own show and the ongoing internal tensions between conservatives and reformers, however, he also agrees with other Iranian analysts that his "untimely" menace could backfire, becoming a justification for threats against Iran, at a time that the United States and its allies are determined to continue the fight against international terrorism.

"One of Mr. Hashemi-Rafsanjani’s main characteristics in Iranian politics during the past twenty years is that in order to preserve his own position, he is ready to set fire to all the Caesareas for one handkerchief, including, in the present case, providing Israel with enough pretext to attack Iran", he noted, adding: "for the time being and what is important for Mr. Sharon is that this kind of statements are open invitation for more violence, an encouragement to extremists on either side of the Israel-Palestine conflict".

Observing that despite the fact that Israel is believed to have more than one hundred atomic warheads and the necessary technology to transport them to the very heart of Iran and elsewhere, but no Israeli official nor any newspaper have ever raised the slightest possibility of an atomic threat, "even in defence of their very existence", Mr. Salamatian wondered the reasons behind Mr. Hashemi-Rafsanjani’s declaration, which he said should be taken seriously "considering the rank of the man who pronounced it". ENDS RAFSANJANI NUKE THREATS 141201


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ahmahdinejad; axisofevil; cindysheehan; deadmullahsstink; iran; irannukes; islamofacism; israel; jihad; michaelmoore; muslimnukes; muslims; nuke; nukes; rafsanjani; rop; spielberg; terror; trop; warointerror; wwiii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-148 next last
To: Rutles4Ever
Israel's very survival is at stake. If they are attacked by Iran, then I think you'll see Iran become a smoking, radioactive pit.

In one respect it would be nice to see one of the axis of evil be eliminated without the US having to do the dirty work.

61 posted on 12/13/2005 1:39:30 PM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Celebrate Clinton Impeachment Day - Dec 19th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

oh man. somebody needs to tell these jackholes about strontium 100.


62 posted on 12/13/2005 1:40:02 PM PST by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

Iran a smoking hole? the planet may be killed.


63 posted on 12/13/2005 1:40:40 PM PST by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

The same death wish applies to the People's Republic of China. One of their generals publicly commented on 800 million casualties on their side being "acceptable" in a nuclear exchange with the United States over Taiwan. How convenient, fewer mouths to feed.

The people of Iran are running out of time. The mullahs need to be overthrown, else the mullahs will annihilate their own people - all while sitting safe (?) in some bunker. As for the "Palestinians", the Islamists never cared about the "Palestinians". They are nothing but cannon fodder in their eyes, to be expended.


64 posted on 12/13/2005 1:42:09 PM PST by Fred Hayek (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CurlyBill

Rafsanjani sounds reckless and ignorant to me. He maybe unconsciously shortening his tenure.


65 posted on 12/13/2005 1:42:21 PM PST by oyez (Appeasement is death!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #66 Removed by Moderator

To: Rutles4Ever

Don't wait -- Strike them now!


67 posted on 12/13/2005 1:42:53 PM PST by Continental Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

Still stuck on stupid!


68 posted on 12/13/2005 1:43:51 PM PST by Redleg Duke (Kennedy and Kerry, the two Commissars of the Peoples' Republic of Massachusetts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cloud8

This raghead talks pretty big while hiding behind all those innocent Iranian Women and Children.


69 posted on 12/13/2005 1:45:13 PM PST by Redleg Duke (Kennedy and Kerry, the two Commissars of the Peoples' Republic of Massachusetts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

Israel has had 'the bomb' for decades. To my knowledge it has never suggested it would use it for a first strike victory over it's adversaries.

Iran hasn't even got the bomb yet, and one of it's jackass leaders has the gaul to express his desire to use it to destroy Israel as a whole.

Tell me again which state(s) are the pariahs of the Middle-East.

If Israel does take out Iran's nuclear weapons development
centers, it won't use nukes to do it, even though it could.


70 posted on 12/13/2005 1:46:13 PM PST by DoughtyOne (MSM: Public support for war waining. 403/3 House vote against pullout vaporizes another lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

Meanwhile, Dems are still worried about the timetable for pullout from Iraq, I guess we can pull them out and move them to Teheran?


71 posted on 12/13/2005 1:48:49 PM PST by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse
Iran a smoking hole?the planet may be killed.

Of course it is only speculation, but I don't think so. Granted, it would be an environmental disaster on an unprecedented scale and oil production would be devastated, but I don't think it would be a worldwide catastrophe. It certainly wouldn't be as bad as even a limit exchange between the US and Russia or China.

Of course if you're Iranian, then you might have a wholly different perspective.

72 posted on 12/13/2005 1:49:57 PM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Celebrate Clinton Impeachment Day - Dec 19th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

Sooner or later, we are going to have to nuke the Muslim world.


73 posted on 12/13/2005 1:50:08 PM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
One of Iran’s most influential ruling cleric called Friday on the Muslim states to use nuclear weapon against Israel, assuring them that while such an attack would annihilate Israel, it would cost them "damages only".

There is a magic rock that would glow for a 1,000 years as just "damages".

The end times are creaping up upon us.

74 posted on 12/13/2005 1:50:08 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
If Israel does take out Iran's nuclear weapons development centers, it won't use nukes to do it, even though it could.

A bunker-buster type nuke may be the only way to effectively address the problem.

75 posted on 12/13/2005 1:53:50 PM PST by johnny7 (“Of course, this is Central Park... it was designed in 1850 by Joe Pepitone... ”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: radiohead

Glad to see that everyone decided to nuke all of the Middle East because of an article from 2001 - insert rolling eyes

Nice job folks!

Nobody looks more insane then those that fly off on a tangent from their keyboards.

It is kinda funny that this article is dated 2001.

geesh everyone


76 posted on 12/13/2005 1:54:29 PM PST by silentknight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

I'm interested in what El-Baradei has to say about this latest Iranian Command Authority statement.

How, at this point, should Israel respond to something like this?


77 posted on 12/13/2005 1:56:07 PM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs

I wouldn't be surprised if Iran already has a nuke.


78 posted on 12/13/2005 1:58:16 PM PST by silentknight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Tolik; SJackson

ping


79 posted on 12/13/2005 2:01:20 PM PST by King Prout (many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silentknight

What we've always been told about Iran is that the minute they get a nuke, they'll use it on Israel.

If they have a nuke, they may not have a suitable means of delivering it.

If they have both, today, then I would be surprised.


80 posted on 12/13/2005 2:01:43 PM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson