Posted on 12/15/2005 12:28:40 PM PST by JTN
The Christian Defense Coalition Director says in many cases "national security" has become more important than protecting the First Amendment and civil liberties.
Coalition especially concerned about the Patriot Act defining terrorism as "... .to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion."
Those definitions are so broad it is an open invitation for the government to harass and attack any groups who use public demonstrations or peaceful civil disobedience to "influence" government policy.
Organization cites the improper use of the federal RICO laws against non-violent pro-life activists as a clear example of how the Patriot Act could be used against a broad spectrum of political and social activist groups.
Rev. Patrick J. Mahoney, Director of the Christian Defense Coalition, comments, "It is our hope that the Senate will block passage of the renewal of the Patriot Act and craft legislation that will more carefully protect and safeguard civil liberties and the First Amendment. Sadly with the passage of the Patriot Act, a climate and culture has been created in which 'national security' has become more important than protecting civil liberties. The result has been the First Amendment has become the 'second victim' of 9/11 and the rights of peaceful demonstrators trampled. For example, in the name of 'national security' I was arrested on a public sidewalk at the Salt Lake Olympics for holding a sign which said God bless America. And for the sake of 'national security', I was arrested on a Washington, D.C. public sidewalk for holding a sign of the Ten Commandments in front of St. Matthew's Cathedral during the annual Red Mass."
According to the Center for Media and Democracy:
Rev. Pat Mahoney was formerly with the anti-abortion group Operation Rescue and is now executive director of the Christian Defense Coalition, "an informal but growing network of conservative, religious and disability organizations who, with the click of a computer mouse, are enlisting hundreds of thousands of people in Bob and Mary Schindler's fight to keep their daughter Terri Schiavo alive."
"The first goal of the campaign, Mahoney said, is to save Terri Schiavo's life. But he and others also hope to roll back the laws and ethical and medical guidelines that have evolved since 1990, when the U.S. Supreme Court recognized artificial sustenance and hydration as medical treatment." Knight Ridder, March 14, 2005 (http://www.bradenton.com/mld/bradenton/news/local/11129371.htm).
Apparently you are under the mis-impression these two groups are synonymous with conservativism.
Like I figured crackpots.
Thought crimes, plain and simple. The funny thing is, this is supported by a lot of people who'd rightfully raise hell against the same logic when it's used in "hate crime" laws. Amazing how tightly the blinders are worn when Republican politicians give their seal of approval to something.
Yes, one can. That doesn't mean one should not do it in a way that's plausible. When dealing with government, if you're not asking "What if..?" you're not doing your job as a citizen.
Bombing a country or threatening to do so is coercive and should be outlawed.
Looking over this thread, it appears to me that there's only one poster who qualifies for "crazy uncle" status...
Pro-life equals crackpot, eh? Good to know.
Here's a dose of reality for you, Hillary Clinton. Blackbird.
No just those pretending that TS was not already dead for all practical purposes.
BTW Rush is speaking about the disastrous Senate decision to refuse to re-pass the meat of the Patriot Act. Free reign for terrorists once again.
Renewing the Patriot Act is the biggest Pro-life action the government could make. The nutcases carrying water for the Left in opposition are not Pro-Life rather Pro-Terrorist.
Those who recognize the truth are always in the minority.
Often, but not always. Those who are delusional tend to be in the minority much more often. The chief difference between the two is that the former usually make some attempt to back up their position when they know they're in the minority.
Delusion is defined by paying more attention to the non-real than the real. The TS affair is the clearest example of delusion I have seen in many a day and it has hurt FR immensely because of the fanaticism unleashed. It has weakened the conservative movement more than anything I can think of off hand.
If you come back to this thread you will find some more good quotes. Also see this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1541449/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.