The WaPo's story on the recent developments in the MD4Bush saga. This wasn't written by Matthew Mosk.
More at the link, mainly background on previous events.
To: NCPAC; MD4Bush; xcullen; Anti-Bubba182; Mo1; cyncooper; BillF; crushkerry; Howlin; backhoe; ...
To: Jim Robinson
"Just because that email is on my business card doesn't mean a thing...yea that's it..that's the ticket..."
L
3 posted on
12/15/2005 10:15:57 PM PST by
Lurker
("Son, there's only two things you need in this world; love and a .45.")
To: conservative in nyc
This Rat has been captured
4 posted on
12/15/2005 10:16:12 PM PST by
GeronL
(Leftism is the INSANE Cult of the Artificial)
To: conservative in nyc
Okay, I'm not exactly up to speed on the whole MD4Bush thing. Who was he, what did he do, etc.
5 posted on
12/15/2005 10:21:21 PM PST by
Gordongekko909
(I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
To: conservative in nyc
Not written by Mosk, and not a mention of Mosk using MD4Bush's account to verify FReemails.
What is left out of this article is more damning than what is written.
Typical.
6 posted on
12/15/2005 10:24:12 PM PST by
Carling
(http://www.marriedadults.com/howarddeanscreamaudio141jq.mp3)
To: NoCmpromiz
13 posted on
12/16/2005 12:57:47 AM PST by
NoCmpromiz
(John 14:6 is a non-pluaralistic statement.)
To: conservative in nyc
What continues to astound me: The origins of all this. A rumor about Democrat O'Malley. Maybe true; maybe not. At this point, who cares? The "plant" in FR brought the "rumor" forward. Making cozy with Republican Steffan of Ehrlich's office. Steffan made no substantial remarks upon the rumor; instead brushing it aside. Steffan's "activity" is charged as "rumormongering" on the Internet and against Democrat O'Malley. Steffan resigns wishing to bring no dishonor to Ehrlich's office.
Okay, the current bruaha aside... what does this tell me? The rumor is probably true. And the only one really worried about this rumor being true is Maryland Democrats, and possibly that Mrs. O'Malley might be a true terror in life and limb to Maryland Democrats and Mr. O'Malley. Otherwise, I just don't get it. Democrats are the ones who, during Clinton/Monica escapades, said that "sex" doesn't matter.
Then, that Dems would go to THIS much drama and continue to is mind blowing.
And now with the current "denials" from the Dems and WaPo, tells me they are still trying to deny a rumor. Bury it.
On another thread, I read where Dems are making obliquely worded threats against Jim Robinson and FR.
What's that old chestnut about "when we practice to deceive"....?
It all just gets worse, doesn't it.
18 posted on
12/16/2005 5:25:54 AM PST by
Alia
To: conservative in nyc
Taylor and Ehrlich's chief legal counsel, Jervis S. Finney, stopped short yesterday of alleging that O'Doherty was MD4BUSH. The Dems would LOVE to see Ehrlich make the allegation ... the Dems know MD4BUSH is not O'Doherty.
21 posted on
12/16/2005 12:53:10 PM PST by
bimbo
To: conservative in nyc
"In the fall of 2004, the anonymous user engaged former aide Joseph Steffen, also posting anonymously, in discussions of the spreading of rumors about Baltimore Mayor Martin O'Malley's personal life."
I haven't followed this case much. Just wanted to ask if there is a link to these discussions/emails. I hear that emails were exchanged, but have they been posted someplace?
No wonder I'm confused.
23 posted on
12/16/2005 7:35:12 PM PST by
Baraonda
(Demographic is destiny. Don't hire 3rd world illegal aliens nor support businesses that hire them.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson